Skip to main content

Architectural Design of Critical Care Units: A Comparison of Best Practice Units and Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to develop an awareness of important elements in hospital critical care architectural design. Intended for the non-designer, focus will be on functional programmatic elements, fundamental planning concepts, physical ICU organization and future trends. The sources and references provided will lead the interested reader to extensive materials which will broaden the knowledge of both design practice and evidence-based design research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hilberman M. The evolution of intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 1975;3(4):159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. About us: our history. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. 2013. http://www.chop.edu/about/our-history/. Accessed 5 Aug 2013.

  3. Health Forum LLC. American Hospital Association Hospital Statistics, 2011 (2009 survey data). Chicago: American Hospital Association; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carr BG, Addyson DK, Kahn JM. Variation in critical care beds per capita in the United States: implications for pandemic and disaster planning. JAMA. 2010;303:1371–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix and costs. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadenhead C, Anderson D. Critical care unit design, the winners and future trends: an investigative study. World Health Des J. 2009;2:72–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), and American Institute of Architects (AIA): award winning ICU designs: how to build a better facility for patients and caregivers. Society of Critical Care Medicine; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Facility Guidelines Institute: guidelines for design and construction of health care facilities. Chicago: The Facility Guidelines Institute; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allison D, Hamilton DK. Analysis of department area in contemporary hospitals: calculation methodologies & design factors in major patient care departments. Funded in part by the American Institute of Architects’ Academy of Architecture for Health Foundation; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rashid M. A decade of adult intensive care unit design: a study of the physical design features of the best-practice examples. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006;29(4):282–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leaf DE, Homel P, Factor PH. Relationship between ICU design and mortality. Chest. 2010;137:1022–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson D, Hamilton DK, Cadenhead C. Guidelines for intensive care unit design. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1586–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pati D, Evans J, Waggener L, et al. An exploratory examination of medical gas booms versus traditional headwalls in intensive care unit design. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008;31:340–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jastremski CA, Harvey M. Making changes to improve the intensive care unit experience for patients and their families. New Horiz. 1998;6:99–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 1984;224:420–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to recognize the invaluable contributions to this study by Diana Anderson, MD, MArch; Neil Halpern, MD, Medical Director, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ICU; Owen Samuels, MD, Medical Director, Emory University Hospital ICU; Professor D. Kirk Hamilton, FAIA, Texas A&M University; WHR Architects and the WHR Tradewell Fellows, Houston, Texas; and Lyle R. Cadenhead, PhD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles D. Cadenhead FAIA, FACHA, FCCM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cadenhead, C.D. (2014). Architectural Design of Critical Care Units: A Comparison of Best Practice Units and Design. In: Wheeler, D., Wong, H., Shanley, T. (eds) Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6362-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6362-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6361-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6362-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics