Abstract
Decentralized coordination is usually based on self-organizing principles. Very often research on decentralized multi-robot systems makes a general claim on the presence of these principles underlying the success of the studied systems, but it does not conduct a detailed analysis of which specific principles are at work, nor it attempts to measure their effects in terms of the evolution of the system’s organization in time or to analyze the robustness of its operation versus noise (e.g. see Holland and Melhuish in Artif. Life 5:173–202, 1999; Krieger et al. in Nature 406:992–995, 2000; Kube and Bonabeau in Robot. Auton. Syst. 30:85–101, 2000; Quinn et al. in Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361:2321–2344, 2003). This chapter studies some of these issues in a multi-robot system presented in detail elsewhere (Baldassarre et al. in Applications of evolutionary computing—proceedings of the second European workshop on evolutionary robotics, pp. 581–592. Springer, Berlin, 2003; Artif. Life 12(3):289–311, 2006; Proceedings of the fifth international conference on complex systems (ICCS2004), 16–21 May 2004, Boston, MA, USA, pp. e1–e14, 2007a; IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 37(1):244–239, 2007b). This system is formed by robots that are physically connected and have to coordinate their direction of motion to explore an open arena without relying on a centralized coordination. The robots are controlled by an identical neural network whose weights are evolved through a genetic algorithm. Through this algorithm the system develops the capacity to solve the task on the basis of self-organizing principles. The goal of this chapter is to present some preliminary results that show how such principles lead the organization of the system, measured through a suitable index based on Boltzmann entropy, to arise in a quite abrupt way if the noise/signal ratio related to the signal that allows the robots to coordinate is slowly decreased. With this respect, the chapter argues, on the basis of theoretical arguments and experimental evidence, that such sudden emergence of organization shares some properties with the phase transitions exhibited by some physical system studied in physics (Anderson in Basic notions of condensed matter physics. Perseus, Cambridge, 1997).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, P. (1997). Basic notions of condensed matter physics. Cambridge: Perseus.
Anderson, C., Theraulaz, G., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (2002). Self-assemblages in insect societies. Insectes Sociaux, 49, 1–12.
Baldassarre, G. (2008). Self-organization as phase transition in decentralized groups of robots: a study based on Boltzmann entropy. In M. Prokopenko (Ed.), Advances in applied self-organizing systems (1st ed.). London: Springer.
Baldassarre, G., & Nolfi, S. (2009). Strengths and synergies of evolved and designed controllers: a study within collective robotics. Artificial Intelligence, 173, 857–875.
Baldassarre, G., Nolfi, S., & Parisi, D. (2003). Evolution of collective behaviour in a group of physically linked robots. In G. Raidl, A. Guillot, & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.), Applications of evolutionary computing—proceedings of the second European workshop on evolutionary robotics (pp. 581–592). Berlin: Springer.
Baldassarre, G., Parisi, D., & Nolfi, S. (2006). Distributed coordination of simulated robots based on self-organization. Artificial Life, 12(3), 289–311.
Baldassarre, G., Parisi, D., & Nolfi, S. (2007a). Measuring coordination as entropy decrease in groups of linked simulated robots. In A. Minai & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on complex systems (ICCS2004), Boston, MA, USA, 16–21 May 2004 (pp. e1–e14). http://www.necsi.edu/events/iccs/2004proceedings.html.
Baldassarre, G., Trianni, V., Bonani, M., Mondada, F., Dorigo, M., & Nolfi, S. (2007b). Self-organised coordinated motion in groups of physically connected robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 37(1), 224–239.
Beckers, R., Holland, O. E., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (1994). From local actions to global tasks: stigmergy and collective robotics. In R. A. Brooks & P. Maes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems (Artificial Life IV) (pp. 181–189). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cao, Y. U., Fukunaga, A. S., & Kahng, A. B. (1997). Cooperative mobile robotics: antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, 4, 1–23.
Dorigo, M., & Sahin, E. (2004). Swarm robotics—special issue editorial. Autonomous Robots, 17(2–3), 111–113.
Dorigo, M., Trianni, V., Sahin, E., Gross, R., Labella, T. H., Baldassarre, G., Nolfi, S., Denebourg, J.-L., Floreano, D., & Gambardella, L. M. (2004). Evolving self-organizing behavior for a swarm-bot. Autonomous Robots, 17(2–3), 223–245.
Dudek, G., Jenkin, M., Milios, E., & Wilkes, D. (1996). A taxonomy for multi-agent robotics. Autonomous Robots, 3, 375–397.
Feldman, P. D. (1998). A brief introduction to: Information theory, excess entropy and computational mechanics (Technical report). Department of Physics, University of California.
Ferrauto, T., Parisi, D., Di Stefano, G., & Baldassarre, G. (2013, in press). Different genetic algorithms and the evolution of specialisation: a study with groups of simulated neural robots. Artificial Life.
Holland, O., & Melhuish, C. (1999). Stimergy, self-organization, and sorting in collective robotics. Artificial Life, 5, 173–202.
Ijspeert, A. J., Martinoli, A., Billard, A., & Gambardella, L. M. (2001). Collaboration through the exploitation of local interactions in autonomous collective robotics: the stick pulling experiment. Autonomous Robots, 11, 149–171.
Krieger, M. J. B., Billeter, J. B., & Keller, L. (2000). Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots. Nature, 406, 992–995.
Kube, R. C., & Bonabeau, E. (2000). Cooperative transport by ants and robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 30, 85–101.
Kube, C. R., & Zhang, H. (1993). Collective robotics: from social insects to robots. Adaptive Behavior, 2(2), 189–219.
Mondada, F., Pettinaro, G., Guignard, A., Kwee, I., Floreano, D., Denebourg, J.-L., Nolfi, S., Gambardella, L. M., & Dorigo, M. (2004). Swarm-bot: a new distributed robotic concept. Autonomous Robots, 17(2–3), 193–221.
Nolfi, S., & Floreano, D. (2001). Evolutionary robotics. the biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prokopenko, M. (2008). Design versus self-organization. In M. Prokopenko (Ed.), Advances in applied self-organizing systems (pp. 3–18). London: Springer.
Prokopenko, M., Gerasimov, V., & Tanev, I. (2006). Evolving spatiotemporal coordination in a modular robotic system. In S. Nolfi, G. Baldassarre, R. Calabretta, J. Hallam, D. Marocco, J.-A. Meyer, O. Miglino, & D. Parisi (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 4095. From animals to animats 9: proceedings of the ninth international conference on the simulation of adaptive behavior (SAB-2006) (pp. 558–569). Berlin: Springer.
Prokopenko, M., Boschetti, F., & Ryan, A. J. (2009). An information-theoretic primer on complexity, self-organization, and emergence. Complexity, 15(1), 11–28.
Quinn, M., Smith, L., Mayley, G., & Husbands, P. (2003). Evolving controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: structured cooperation with minimal sensors. Philosophical Transactions - Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361, 2321–2344.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25–34.
Trianni, V., Nolfi, S., & Dorigo, M. (2006). Cooperative hole-avoidance in a swarm-bot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54(2), 97–103.
Tsai, S., & Salinas, S. R. (1998). Fourth-order cumulants to characterize the phase transitions of a spin-1 Ising model. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 28(1), 58–65.
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the SWARM-BOTS project funded by the Future and Emerging Technologies program (IST-FET) of the European Commission under grant IST-2000-31010. I thank Stefano Nolfi and Domenico Parisi with which I designed, developed and studied extensively the robotic setup studied in the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldassarre, G. (2013). Self-Organization as Phase Transition in Decentralized Groups of Robots: A Study Based on Boltzmann Entropy. In: Prokopenko, M. (eds) Advances in Applied Self-Organizing Systems. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5113-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5113-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5112-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5113-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)