Skip to main content

The Implications of David Hockney Thesis for 3D Computer Graphics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Visualization Currents

Abstract

The debate on whether optics were used to construct perspective images during the Renaissance was reignited by the artist David Hockney’s book Secret Knowledge of the Masters. While others have already discussed this in length, what Hockney brings to the debate are his insights as an artist. What this chapter attempts to do is to explore his thesis in terms of its implications for 3D computer graphics—the latest extension to the Renaissance perspective. Hockney’s assertion that artists from the quattrocento onward painted from mirror and lens-projected images has its implications for the projected images of 3D computer graphics today. Just as technology informed the Renaissance artist on ways of seeing and representing natural phenomena, 3D computer graphics today uses algorithms to simulate these same phenomena. However, neither process can ever approach the absolute clarity of Nature. Attempts to replicate natural phenomena in images are quests for realism—begun in the Renaissance and continued in 3D computer graphics. However, the various techniques used can only ever make the images produced seem real or at least real enough. In the case of the Renaissance artist, this was in the form of painterly techniques to generate the illusion of clarity. For 3D computer graphics, while the mathematical algorithms are adjusted to simulate nature they often simply imitate the quattrocento Masters’ techniques. However, while the Renaissance artist never lost sight of their role in interpreting what they see, 3D computer graphics is supposed to be underpinned by the certainties of its apparent scientific veracity. Hence, is this certainty deserved or is it merely that science and art intertwined in ways that mean one is simply reliant on the other?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    His thesis is based on the premise that the use of optical devices in the quattrocento developed both ultra-real representations of Nature and de-natured (by its optical sub/in-version) what was seen in these projections.

  2. 2.

    Little hard evidence exists for the actual application of optical mirrors in the construction of perspectival images (central to Hockney ’s thesis); although the necessary technology was clearly available (Hockney claims many of the techniques for its application remain hidden due to the secrecy of the various competing guilds).

  3. 3.

    A concave mirror can be used to project a focused image from an opening in a wall onto a darkened interior wall.

  4. 4.

    The systematic, rectilinear, organisation of an emergent urbanism—reflected on a larger rural scale—was fuelled by merchant capitalism: rural roads flanked by Cyprus pines in Tuscany and played out in the dialogical and physical relationship between merchants and the metayers (see [11]).

  5. 5.

    In support of Hockney ’s thesis, his experiments with a window and mirror arrangement reveal the similarly sharply contracted pupils of the subjects of his experiments and those depicted by Jan van Eyck and others. This suggests that, as Hockney found, a strong light such as the full sun is needed to generate a ‘natural-looking’ projection against the wall of an adjacent room.

  6. 6.

    Neural network theorists suggest that our internal representation of the world is an abstraction or reduced encoding of our perception of solids comprised of coloured-in surfaces with continuous depth. Our ganglion cells separate retinal image edges encoding objects by their vertices followed by regions of uniform brightness and boundaries separating regions out which are subsequently painted in with brightness values [13].

  7. 7.

    It is an ironic truism that Foley et al. [4] chose as their subject matter for the front cover of 3D Computer Graphics a computer model of Vermeer’s The Music Lesson. Perhaps they did not use another of van Eyk’s paintings, such as Chacellor Rolin (1436), because it would have been too complicated. This begs the question of the complexity of the paintbrush compared with 3D computer graphics , and how much information can be conveyed in a single brush stroke. Perhaps the physically reconstructed room was chosen over alternatives also for the same reasons.

References

  1. Benoit, B.: Chat Sofa/Carlo Colombo: Modelled in 3Ds Max 2012 and Marvelous Designer, rendered in Vray. www.bbb3viz.com (2011). Accessed 10 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coyne, R.: Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age. The MIT Press, Massachusetts (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edgerton, S.Y.: The Heritage of Giotto’s Geometry: Art and Science on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foley, J.D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S.K., Hughes, J.F.: 3D Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gombrich, E.H.: Meditations on a Hobby Horse and other Essays on the Theory of Art. Phaidon, London 1978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gombrich, E.H.: The Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Phaidon, Oxford (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gombrich, E.H.: Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hockney, D.: Secret Knowledge, Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. Thames & Hudson, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemp, M.: The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press, New Haven (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kemp, M.: The Oxford History of Western Art. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lefebvre, H.: The Production of Space. Blackwell, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manovich, L.: The Mapping of Space: Perspective, Radar, and 3D computer graphics. http://manovich.net/TEXT/mapping.html. Accessed 18 Aug 2012

  13. Marr, D.: Vision, a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell, W.J.: The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-photographic Era. The MIT Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, W.J., McCullough, M.: Digital Design Media. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panofsky, E.: Perspective as Symbolic Form (Wood, C. (trans.)). Zone Books, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Gomez, A., Pelletier, L.: Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richens, P.: Computer aided art direction. In: Penz, F., Thomas, M (eds.) Cinema & Architecture. Méliès, Mallet-Stevens, Multimedia, British Film Institute, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richens, P.: The piranesi system for interactive rendering. In: CAAD Futures 99, Atlanta, June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruskin, J.: The Elements of Perspective. Routledge, London (1907)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yorke, T., (photographer) in Steadman, J.P.: Vermeer’s Camera: Uncovering the Truth behind the Masterpieces, Oxford University Press, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Talbott, S.L.: The Future Does Not Compute: Transcending the Machines in Our Midst. O’Reilly & Associates. http://pfaff.newton.cam.ac.uk/mirrors/n…com/people/staff/stevet/fdnc/ch22.html (1995). Accessed 3 July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tufte, E.R.: Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics, Cheshire (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wertheim, M.: The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. Doubleday, Sydney (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woo, M., Neider, J., Davis, T.: OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, Version 1.1, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. © Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien, Vienna (10-05-2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. © RMN, Musée du Louvre, Stéphane Maréchalle, Paris (10-05-2012]

    Google Scholar 

  28. © TATE Modern, London (10-05-2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. © San Diego Museum of Art, San Diego (10-05-2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. © The National Gallery, London (10-05-2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Supplied by Royal Collection Trust, © HM Queen Elizabeth II 2012, Buckingham Palace, London (10-05-2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodor Wyeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wyeld, T. (2013). The Implications of David Hockney Thesis for 3D Computer Graphics. In: Marchese, F., Banissi, E. (eds) Knowledge Visualization Currents. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4303-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4303-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4302-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4303-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics