Skip to main content

Case Study I: Reliability of Monitoring Platforms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-* and P2P for Network Management

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Computer Science ((BRIEFSCOMPUTER))

  • 537 Accesses

Abstract

Monitoring is essential in modern network management to identify problems in underlying communication infrastructures of modern organizations. However, current monitoring systems are unable to recover their internal faulty entities forcing the network administrator to manually fix the occasionally broken monitoring solution. This case study, therefore, address this issue by introducing a self-healing monitoring solution following the principles of Self-* P2P design. The proposed solution combines the availability and communication transparency provided by P2P-based overlays with self-healing properties following the principles proposed for the self-* P2P design. The solution here presented considers a scenario of a monitoring system for a Network Access Control (NAC) installation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mirroring the traffic from all nodes to a single port of the switch was not possible due to limitations of such device.

References

  1. Aysal, T., Barner, K.: On the convergence of perturbed non-stationary consensus algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2009. The 28th Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 2132–2140 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benediktsson, J., Swain, P.: Consensus theoretic classification methods. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22(4), 688–704 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berns, A., Ghosh, S.: Dissecting self-* properties. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, 2009. SASO ’09, pp. 10–19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding, X., Gu, Z., Shi, L., Hou, Y.: A failure detection model based on message delay prediction. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, 2009. GCC ’09, pp. 24–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foundation, A.S.: Welcome to apache axis2/java (February 2010). http://ws.apache.org/axis2/. Accessed March 2012

  6. GPPD: Parallel and distributed processing group—GPPD (2008). http://gppd.inf.ufrgs.br/new/. Accessed March 2012

  7. Izumi, T., Saitoh, A., Masuzawa, T.: Timed uniform consensus resilient to crash and timing faults. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2004, pp. 243–252 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kar, S., Moura, J.: Distributed consensus algorithms in sensor networks with imperfect communication: link failures and channel noise. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57(1), 355–369 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. López, G., Cánovas, O., Gómez, A.F., Jiménez, J.D., Marín, R.: A network access control approach based on the AAA architecture and authorization attributes. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 30(3), 900–919 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marquezan, C.C., Panisson, A., Granville, L.Z., Nunzi, G., Brunner, M.: Maintenance of monitoring systems throughout self-healing mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 19th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, DSOM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5273, pp. 176–188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nobre, J.C., Granville, L.Z.: Consistency of states of management data in p2p-based autonomic network management. In: Proceedings of the 20th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, DSOM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5841, pp. 99–110. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J., Murray, R.: Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc. IEEE 95(1), 215–233 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panisson, A., Melchiors, C., Granville, L.Z., Almeida, M.J.B., Tarouco, L.M.R.: Designing the architecture of p2p-based network management systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC’06, pp. 69–75 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Panisson, A.: Aplicação de técnicas de distribuição de carga em sistemas de gerenciamento de redes baseados em p2p (2007), master thesis (In Portuguese). http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/11450. Accessed March 2012

  15. Tanenbaum, A.S., Steen, M.V. (eds.): Distributed Systems—Principles and Designs, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marquezan, C.C., Granville, L.Z. (2012). Case Study I: Reliability of Monitoring Platforms. In: Self-* and P2P for Network Management. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4201-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4201-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4200-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4201-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics