Skip to main content

Generalized Linear Models and Its Extensions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation
  • 5527 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces how to analyze nonstandard data types, like binary, categorical, ordinal, and time to event data through generalized linear models (GLMs) and their extension. Logistic regression of binary or ordinal data, Poisson regression of count data, beta regression of proportions, and parametric modeling of survival data are discussed, as are generalized estimating equations. GLMs are then extended to nonlinear GLMs. Three case studies are presented: analysis of adverse event data from a clinical trial, analysis of the frequency of seizure data, and ordinal regression analysis of neutropenia and time to event data from a clinical study with a new anticancer drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have to admit that in the first edition of this book in the chapter on Case Studies in Linear and Nonlinear Regression in the example on logistic regression, I made the common misinterpretation of the OR as relative risk.

  2. 2.

    An example of clustering is when observations are collected across multiple sites but subjects within a site are correlated. This might occur because particular physicians may treat patients a particular way or patients may receive better care within a particular hospital leading to site differences in response.

References

  • Aalen OO. Effects of frailty in survival analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1994; 3: 227-243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aarons L and Graham G. Methodological approaches to the population analysis of toxicity data. Toxicology Letters 2001; 120: 405-410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams DI, Goldman AI, Launer C, Korvick JA, Neaton JD, Crane LR, Grodesky M, Wakefield S, Muth K, Kornegay S, Cohn DL, Harris A, Luskin-Hawk R, Markowitz N, Sampson JH, Thompson M, Deyton L, and for the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. A comparative trial of didanosine or zalcitabine after treatment with zidovudine in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330: 657-662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG and Deeks JJ. Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common. British Medical Journal 1998; 317: 1318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG, DeStavola BL, Love SB, and Stepniewska KA. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. British Journal of Cancer 1985; 72: 511-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquerreta I, Aldaz A, Giraldez J, and Sierrasesumaga L. Methotrexate pharmacokinetics and survival in osteosarcoma. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 2004; 42: 52-58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger GA. Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods 2004; 7: 127-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg CB and Gray R. Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. Biometrika 1984; 71: 11-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender R and Grouven U. Logistic regression models used in medical research are poorly presented. British Medical Journal 1996; 313: 628.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bender R and Grouven U. Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998; 10: 809-816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blesch KS, Gieschke R, Tsukamoto Y, Reigner B, Burger H-U, and Steimer J-L. Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: The capecitabine experience. Investigational New Drugs 2003; 21: 195-223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boeckmann AJ, Sheiner LB, and Beal SL. NONMEM Users Guide - Parts I-V. NONMEM Project Group, San Francisco, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE and Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88: 125-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunden MN, Vidmar TJ, and MCKean JW. Drug Interactions and Lethality Analysis. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno R, Hille D, Riva A, Vivier N, ten Bokkel Huinnink WW, van Osterom AT, Kaye SB, Verweij J, Fossella FV, Valero V, Rigas JR, Seidman AD, Chevalier B, Fumoleau P, Burris HA, Ravdin PM, and Sheiner LB. Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in Phase II studies in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1998; 16: 187-196.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton A and Altman DG. Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines. British Journal of Cancer 2004; 91: 4-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC and Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey V, Zeger SL, and Diggle PJ. Modeling multivariate binary data with alternating logistic regression. Biometrika 1993; 80: 517-526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1972; 34: 187-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR and Snell EJ. The Analysis of Binary Data. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox EH, Veyrat-Follet C, Beal SL, Fuseau E, Kenkare S, and Sheiner LB. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of repeated measures time-to-event pharmacodynamic responses: the antiemetic effect of ondansetron. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1999; 27: 625-644.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies HTO, Crombie IK, and Tavakoli M. When can odds ratios mislead? British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis M and Langhorne P. So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here? British Medical Journal 1994; 309: 1273-1277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Henderson R and Philipson P. Random effects models for joint analysis of repeated measurement and time to event outcomes. In: Longitudinal Data Analysis, (Ed. Fitmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G and Molenberghs G). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 349-366, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari SLP and Cribari-Neta F. Beta regression for modeling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 2004; 31: 799-815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, and Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame B, Miller R, and Lalonde RL. Evaluation of mixture modeling with count data using NONMEM. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 2003; 30: 167-183.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda H and Ohashi Y. A guideline for reporting results of a statistical analysis in Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997; 27: 121-127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gieschke R, Burger H-U, Reigner B, Blesch KS, and Steimer J-L. Population pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships of capecitabine metabolites in colorectal cancer patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2003; 55: 252-263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomeni R, Lavergne A, and Merlo-Pich E. Modeling placebo response in depression trials using a longitudinal model with informative dropout. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2009; 36: 4-10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grambsch PM and Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests in diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994; 81: 515-526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X and Carlin BP. Separate and joint modeling of longitudinal and event time data using standard computer packages. American Statistician 2004; 58: 16-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin JW and Hilbe JM. Generalized Estimating Equations. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R, Diggle PJ, and Dobson A. Joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 465-480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez AV, Vergouwe Y, and Steyerberg EW. Reporting of predictive logistic models should be based on evidence-based guidelines. Chest 2003; 124: 2034-2035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, and Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16: 965-980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. A goodness of fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics Series - Simulation A 1980; A10: 1043-1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time To Event Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C and Sale ME. A joint model for nonlinear longitudinal data with informative dropout. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2003; 30: 83-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkely Symposium on Mathematical Statisticsn and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 221-233, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston G and Stokes ME. Repeated measures analysis with discrete data using the SAS System. In: Proceedings of the 22nd SAS Users Group International, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, pp. 1300-1305, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson S, Kjellsson M, and Karlsson MO. Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2004; 31: 299-320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan EL and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1958; 53: 457-481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay R and Kinnersley N. On the use of the accelerated failure time model as an alternative to the proportional hazards model in the treatment of time to event data: a case study in influenza. Drug Information Journal 2002; 36: 571-579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellsson, M. C., Zingmark, P-H., Jonsson, E. N., and Karlsson, M. O. Comparing the proportional odds model to the differential drug effect model for cumulative logits. Presented at the Population Approach Group in Europe (PAGE), Pamplona, Spain; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG and Klein M. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. Springer, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert D. Zero-inflated poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 1992; 34: 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang TA and Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang W. Frailty selection and HIV. Lancet 1989; 8651: 1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee ET and Wang JW. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Kimko HC, Rogge MC, Wang D, Nestorov I, and Peck CC. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of etanercept using logistic regression analysis. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2003; 73: 348-365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeshow S and Hosmer DW. The use of goodness of fit statistics in the development of logistic regression models. American Journal of Epidemiology 1982; 115: 92-106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaffre E and Spiessens B. On the effect of the number of quadrature points in a logistic random-effects model: an example. Applied Statistics 2001; 50: 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang K-Y and Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang K-Y and Zeger SL. Inference based on estimating functions in the presence of nuisance parameters (with discussion). Statistical Science 1995; 10: 158-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litiere S, Alonso A, and Molenberghs G. The impact of misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and performance of inferential procedures in the generalized linear mixed models. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27: 3125-3144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CY and Sambol NC. Pharmacodynamic analysis of analgesic clinical trials: nonlinear mixed-effects logistic models. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1999; 9: 253-270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn M and McNeil D. Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 1995; 51: 524-532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., Ouellet, D., Burger, P., and Corrigan, B. Exposure-response analysis using time to event data: an example using sleep onset. Presented at the Population Approach Group in Europe (PAGE), Pamploma, Spain; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss M, Wellman A, and Cotsonis MA. An appraisal of multivariable logistic models in the pulmonary and critical care literature. Chest 2003; 123: 923-928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy J. Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics 1986; 33: 341-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 1991; 78: 691-692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Toxicity Criteria Manual, Version 3.0. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor AF. Comparisons of regression constants fitted by maximum likelihood to four common transformations of binomial data. Human Genetics 1964; 27: 241-246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng'Andu NH. An empirical comparison of statistical tests for assessing the proportional hazards assumption of Cox's model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16: 611-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell AA. Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes DA. Frailty models for multiple event times. In: Survival Analysis: State of the Art, (Ed. Klein JP and Goel PK). Kluwer, Boston, pp. 471-480, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbe J, Ferreira E, and Nunez-Anton V. Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models for survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 3493-3510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pan W. Akaike's information criteria in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 2001; 57: 120-125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panhard X, Goujard C, Legrand M, Taburet AM, Diquet B, Mentre F, and and the COPHAR 1-ANRS Study Group. Population pharmacokinetic analysis for nelfinavir and its metabolite M8 in virologically controlled HIV-infected patients on HAART. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2005; 60: 390-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel K, Kay R, and Rowell L. Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models: an application in influenza. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2006; 213: 224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson B and Harrell FE. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Applied Statistics 1990; 39: 205-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pregibon D. Logistic regression diagnostics. Annals of Statistics 1981; 9: 705-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice RL, Williams J, and Peterson AV. On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 1981; 68: 373-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose CE, Martin SW, Wannemuehler KA, and Plikaytis BD. On the use of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling vaccine adverse event count data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2006; 16: 463-481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1982; 69: 239-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB. A new approach to the analysis of analgesic drug trials, illustrated with bromfenac data. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1994; 56: 309-322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB, Beal SL, and Dunne A. Analysis of nonrandomly censored ordered categorical longitudinal data from analgesic trials (including comments). Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92: 1235-1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson M and Verkuilen J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods 2006; 11: 54-71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sribney W. What is the difference between random-effects and population-averaged estimators?; 1999 (http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/repa.html).

  • Stokes ME, Davis CS, and Koch GG. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart EL, Zuideveld KP, de Jongh J, Danhof M, Thijs LG, and Strack van Schijndel RMJ. Population pharmacodynamic modeling of lorazepam- and midazolam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2006; 62: 185-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai B, Machin D, White I, and Gebski V. Competing risks analysis of patients with osteosarcoma: a comparison of four different approaches. Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20: 661-684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Brayshaw N, Tomaszewski K, Troke P, and Wood N. Investigation of the potential relationships between plasma voriconazole concentrations and visual adverse events or liver function test abnormalities. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2006; 46: 235-243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao J and Schabenberger O. Fitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Nonlinear Mixed Models Using the SAS System Course Notes. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thall PF and Vail SC. Some covariance models for longitudinal count data with overdispersion. Biometrics 1990; 46: 657-671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tod M, Farcy-Afif M, Stocco J, Boyer B, Bouton V, Sinegre M, and Marcellin P. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and time-to-event models of ribavirin-induced anaemia in chronic hepatitis C. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2005; 44: 417-428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke G and Lesaffre E. The effect of misspecifying the random effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 1997; 23: 541-556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbel DA, Heller G, Kelly WK, and Scher HI. Quantifying the amount of variation in survival explained by PSA. Clinical Cancer Research 2002; 8: 2576-2579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, and Dewey JE. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute Forms). Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei LJ, Lin DY, and Weissfeld L. Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989; 84: 1065-1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise J. Links to tobacco industry influences review conclusions. British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AM, White IR, Hillsdon M, and Carpenter J. Comparison of imputation and modeling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes. International Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 34: 89-99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie R, Mathijssen RHJ, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, and Karlsson MO. Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan its metabolite in relation with diarrhea. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2002; 72: 265-272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis, second edition. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelterman D. Models for Discrete Data. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng B. Summarizing the goodness of fit on generalized linear models for longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 1265-1275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zingmark P-H. Models for Ordered Categorical Pharmacodynamic Data. Uppsala University PhD Dissertation, Uppsala, Sweden, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingmark P-H, Edenius C, and Karlsson MO. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for the depletion of Vbeta5.2/5.3 T cells by the monoclonal antibody ATM-027 in patients with multiple sclerosis, as measured by FACS. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2004; 58: 378-389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zingmark P-H, Ekblom M, Odergren T, Ashwood T, Lyden P, and Karlsson MO. Population pharmacokinetics of clomethiazole and its effect on the natural course of sedation in acute stroke patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2003; 56: 173-183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, and Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim JG, Chu H, and Chen LM. Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data. Journal of Clinical Oncology 28; 2796-2801, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG and Klein M. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text, 2nd edition. Springer, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruance SL, Reid JE, Grace M, and Samore M. Hazard ratio in clinical trials. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48; 2787-2792, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonate, P.L. (2011). Generalized Linear Models and Its Extensions. In: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9485-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics