Skip to main content

Embryo and Oocyte Banking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncofertility Medical Practice

Abstract

For women of reproductive age who are scheduled to undergo medical treatment that could lead to premature decline of ovarian function, embryo and oocyte cryopreservation—or “banking”—are the most commonly used fertility preservation options. Embryo cryopreservation (i.e., standard in vitro fertilization) before chemotherapy is the most well-established and widely available method of fertility preservation. Both embryo and oocyte banking require controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocyte retrieval over a period of approximately 12–14 days; thus, these techniques are only appropriate if chemotherapy can be postponed without compromising the patient’s treatment outcomes. Classic and modified controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols are described as well as the costs, success rates, and potential risks of the procedures, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and intra-abdominal bleeding, which must be weighed in the context of the cancer patient’s overall health status. The methods of oocyte cryopreservation currently in use slow freezing and vitrification, and the success rates of each are also discussed. This chapter concludes with a review of tumor-specific considerations for the use of embryo or oocyte banking for patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, hematologic malignancies, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee SJ, et al, American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Wolff M, et al. Fertility preservation in women-a practical guide to preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies in breast cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma and borderline ovarian tumours by the fertility preservation network FertiPROTEKT. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright J, et al. Fertility preservation in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:4118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noyes N, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation as a fertility preservation measure for cancer patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:323–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kesic V, et al. Fertility preserving management in gynecologic cancer patients: the need for centralization. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:1613–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel A, et al. Reproductive health assessment for women with cancer: a pilot study. Reproductive health assessment for women with cancer: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:191.e1–e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forman RG, et al. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using agonists of gonadotrophin releasing hormone for in vitro fertilization: a European series and a proposal for prevention. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:502–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MacDougall MJ, Tan SL, Jacobs HS. In vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:579–600.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group 2009. Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:232–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maltaris T, et al. The effect of cancer treatment on female fertility and strategies for preserving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;130:148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts JE, Oktay K. Fertility preservation: a comprehensive approach to the young woman with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;34:57–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception: a Cochrane review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:640–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gook D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo development of human oocytes cryopreserved using 1, 2-propanediol. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2637–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodri D, et al. Triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated oocyte donor cycles: findings of a large retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beck LN. The average cost of fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Poster presented at 66th annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Denver, 2010. 15–19 Oct 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chambers GM, et al. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maman E, et al. Does controlled ovarian stimulation prior to chemotherapy increase primordial follicle loss and diminish ovarian reserve? An animal study. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:206–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:588–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Knopman JM, et al. Women with cancer undergoing ART for fertility preservation: a cohort study of their response to exogenous gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1476–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet. 1986;1:884–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:251–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porcu E. Oocyte freezing. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:221–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Elst J. Oocyte freezing: here to stay? Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:70–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:391–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barritt J, et al. Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:189.e13–e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cobo A, et al. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rudick B, et al. The status of oocyte cryopreservation in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2642–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S241–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee response to Rybak and Lieman: elective self-donation of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1513–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fadini R, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: comparison between slow and ultrarapid methods. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:171–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith GD, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2088–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao YX, et al. Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martínez-Burgos M, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing of oocytes: effects on morphologic appearance, meiotic spindle configuration, and DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:374–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:769–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cobo A, et al. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagy ZP, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:520–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hankey BF, et al. Trends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast to older women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994;16:7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Higgins S, Haffty BG. Pregnancy and lactation after breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer. Cancer. 1994;73:2175–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goodwin PJ, et al. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2365–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Oktay K, et al. Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3885–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Baynosa J, et al. Timing of breast cancer treatments with oocyte retrieval and embryo cryopreservation. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;5:603–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Madrigrano A, Westphal L, Wapnir I. Egg retrieval with cryopreservation does not delay breast cancer treatment. Am J Surg. 2007;194:477–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Azim A, Constantini-Ferando M, Oktay K. Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2630–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Morice P, et al. Recommendations of the fertility task force of the European society of gynecologic oncology about the conservative management of ovarian malignant tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:951–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wright JD, et al. Fertility preservation in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2009;1(15):4118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Grigg AP, et al. Reproductive status in long-term bone marrow transplant survivors receiving busulfan-cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26:1089–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Meirow D, et al. Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1007–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kempson R, Pokorny G. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium in women aged forty and younger. Cancer. 1968;21:650–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramirez PT, et al. Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:133–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Randall TC, Kurman RJ. Progestin treatment of atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma of the endometrium in women under age 40. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:434–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang YC, et al. Reevaluating the safety of fertility-sparing hormonal therapy for early endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:287–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Juretzka MM, et al. Embryo cryopreservation after diagnosis of stage IIB endometrial cancer and subsequent pregnancy in a gestational carrier. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chiya L, et al. Sparing fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:S101–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Diaz JP, et al. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Plante M, et al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:614–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH/NICHD 5UL1DE019587.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn M. Westphal M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Westphal, L.M., Massie, J.A.M. (2012). Embryo and Oocyte Banking. In: Gracia, C., Woodruff, T. (eds) Oncofertility Medical Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9425-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9425-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9424-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9425-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics