Abstract
It seems imperative that we as individuals who care about the human condition in the poorer parts of the word and about nature must create a new way to undertake what is usually called developmental economics, usually seen as the application of economic principles to less-developed nations. Our reasons include: dissatisfaction with the intellectual foundations of conventional economic models used in development and with the results that have occurred with their use, the general sense of many development economists themselves that conventional economics has failed, the need to do something that will work, the concern that most knowledgeable people have that the future, and especially the future of most developing nations, will be much more constrained by the “end of cheap oil,” and the need to protect whatever nature is left. We generate the “alpha version” of such a model in this chapter, summarizing certain useful approaches and successes of the past, and using a biophysical basis try to generate a synthesis to help the reader. We are not foolish enough to believe that we can in one fell swoop cure all the economic problems that generations of traditional economists have not been able to, but we believe that we do provide a useful basis here for beginning that process and for generating useful results now for field workers. Although our focus here is on developing nations the concepts are applicable anywhere.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hall. C.A.S. (editor, Gregoire Leclerc and Carlos Leon, associate Editers) 2000. Quantifying sustainable development: The future of topical economies. Academic Press, San Diego.
We refer the reader to the following web sites as good examples of other definitions of ecological economics and how ecological economics can actually be done. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Ecological_economics; http://www.fs.fed.us/eco/s21pre.htm, http://www.anzsee.org/ANZSEE8.html.
World-wide Fund for Nature International (WWF). 2004. Living Planet report 2004. Global Footprint Network, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, WWF, Gland Switzerland; Mathis Wackernagel @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94tYMWz_Ia4.
Herendeen, R. and C. Bullard. 1975. The energy costs of Goods and Services. 1963 and 1967, Energy policy 3: 268.
Bullard, C.W.; Hannon, B.; Herendeen, R.A. Energy Flow through the US Economy. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, 1975.
Hannon B. (1981). Analysis of the energy cost of economic activities: 1963 2000. Energy Research Group Doc. No. 316. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Hall, C.A.S., C.J. Cleveland and R. Kaufmann. 1984. Energy and Resource Quality: The ecology of the economic process. Wiley Interscience, NY. 577 pp. (Second Edition. University Press of Colorado).
Cleveland, C.J. 2004. The encyclopedia of energy. Elsevier.
Green Design, Carnegie-Mellon University: http://www.ce.cmu.edu/GreenDesign/research/lca.html.
Odum, H.T. 1996. Environmental accounting, emergy and environmental decision making. John Wiley & Sons. New York, N. Y.
Brown, M. 2004. Energy quality, emergy, transformity: The contributions of H.T. Odum to quantifying and understanding systems. Pp. 201–214. In M. Brown and C.A.S. Hall (eds). Through the Macroscope: the legacy of H.T. Odum. Ecological Modelling, special issue: Volume 178.
Herendeen, R. 2004. Energy analysis and emergy analysis – a comparison. Pp. 227–238. In M. Brown and C.A. Hall (eds). Through the Macroscope: the legacy of H.T. Odum. Ecological Modelling, special issue: Volume 178.
Brown, M. and R. Herendeen. 1996. Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis: a review. Ecological Economics: a comparative review. 19:219–236.
Brown, M., M. Wackernagel and C. A. S. Hall. 2000. Comparable estimates of sustainability: Economic, resource base, ecological footprint and emergy, pp 695–714 in 1 above.
Foran, B., M. Lenzen, C. Dey and M. Bilek. 2005. Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting I Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting Ecological Economics 52: 143–157. 5.
LeClerc, G. and Charles Hall (Eds.) 2008. Making development work: Scientific alternatives to neoclassical economic theory. University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque.
Pontius, R. G. Jr, J. Cornell and C.A.S. Hall. 1995. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 85: 191–203.
Hall, C.A.S., H. Tian, Y. Qi, G. Pontius and J. Cornell. 1995. Modeling spatial and temporal patterns of tropical land use change. Journal of Biogeography 22:753–757.
Detwiler, P. and C.A.S. Hall 1988. Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle. Science. 239:42–47.
Barreteau, O, M. Antona, P. d’Aquino, S. Aubert, S. Boissau, F. Bousquet, W. Daré, M. Etienne, C. Le Page, R. Mathevet, G. Trébuil, J. Weber, 2003. Our companion modelling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 6, no. 1 (http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html).
Swartz P., 1996. “The art of the long view: planning for the future in an uncertain world”, Doubleday, New York, 272p.
Hallock, J., Tharakan, P., Hall, C., Jefferson, M. and Wu, W. 2004. Forecasting the availability and diversity of the geography of oil supplies. Energy 30:2017–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A. (2012). How to Do Biophysical Economics. In: Energy and the Wealth of Nations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9397-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9398-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)