Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ways of Studying the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Religion and Education ((IHRE,volume 3))

Abstract

Psychology is far from a unified discipline. There are strongly differing opinions on how it is to be defined. One consequence of this diversity is methodological pluralism. Methodological pluralism includes the descriptive fact that different schools of psychology favor different research methods as well as the philosophical position that psychology cannot and ought not be defined in terms of a single methodology assumed appropriate for all investigations. Thus, while some would argue for the experimental method combined with the quantitative assessment of change in measured variables as the gold standard for research in religion and spirituality, this position must be balanced by a consideration of a wide variety of other methods used in the study of religion and spirituality. These include quasi-experimental methods when participants cannot be randomly assigned to treatment groups and ethnographic and participant observation often focused on qualitative assessments. The psychological study of religion and spirituality has always been identified with questionnaires and scales designed to measure particular phenomena of interest. Phenomenological studies are of descriptive value in their own right, as well as providing means to operationalize and measure reports of religious and spiritual experiences. Advances in neurophysiological imaging techniques are providing a rich database for correlating brain states with the report of religious and spiritual experiences. Finally, survey research allows the placing of religious and spiritual phenomena within a normative cultural context. A commitment to methodological pluralism assures that both religion and spirituality can be studied in ways appropriate to the richness and diversity that these terms connate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1985).The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1–46). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (1994). Social psychology: The heart and the mind. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 99–142). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari, N. P. (2006). Neuroimaging studies of religious experience: A critical review. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet (Vol. 2, pp. 33–54). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G. W. (1997). Exploring unseen worlds: William James and the philosophy of mysticism. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1977). Experimentation in psychology of religion: An impossible dream? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1979). Experimentation in the psychology of religion: Living with or in a dream? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1995). Object relations theory and religious experience. In R. W. Hood, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of religious experience (pp. 254–268). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. A. (1999). Religion as embodiment. Cultural-psychological concepts and methods in the study of conversion among the “bevindelijken.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 236–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. A., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2006). Methodological issues in the psychology of religion: Toward another paradigm? Journal of Psychology, 140, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, J. (1973). The sense of God: Sociological, anthropological, and psychological approaches to the origin of the sense of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D., Ransohoff, R., & Rambo, L. (1976). Publication trends in the psychology of religion to 1974. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (Eds.). (2000). Varieties of anomalous experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, D. (1995). Salvation on sand mountain: Snake handling and redemption in Southern Appalachia. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1994). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (1994). General social surveys, 1972–1994 [Machine-readable data file]. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [Producer]; Storrs: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [Distributor].

    Google Scholar 

  • Deconchy, J.-P. (1985). Non-experimental and experimental methods in the psychology of religion: A few thoughts on their implication and limits. In L. B. Brown (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of religion (pp. 76–112). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dittes, J. E. (1969). The Psychology of religion. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 602–659). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittes, J. E. (1985). Psychology of religion. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 601–659). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblin, R. (1991). Pahnke’s “Good Friday” experiment: A long-term follow-up and methodological critique. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 23, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblin, R. (1991). Pahnke’s “Good Friday” experiment: A long-term follow-up and methodological critique. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 23, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1999). Appendix A. Social communication and cognition: A very preliminary and highly tentative draft. In E. H. Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 355–379). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. K. C. (1999). Mysticism, mind, consciousness. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Louden, S. H. (2000). The Francis-Louden mystical orientation scale (MOS): A study among Roman Catholic priests. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1984). Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating the psychology of religion. American psychologist, 39, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). The psychology of religion. The Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. M. (1974). Ecstasy: A way of knowing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. M. (1975). Sociology of the paranormal: A reconnaissance. Sage research papers in the social sciences (Vol. 3, No. 90–023). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Johnson, M. W., McCann, U. D., & Jesse, R. (2008). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22, 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U. D., & Jesse, R. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187, 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, F. R. (1995). Jungian theory and religious experience. In R. W. Hood, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of religious experience (pp. 231–253). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happold, F. C. (1963). Mytsticism: A study and an anthology. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A. (1979). The spiritual nature of man: A study of contemporary religious experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., & Morisy, A. (1978). Reports of ecstatic, paranormal, or religious experience in Great Britain and the United States: A comparison of trends. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (1977). Eliciting mystical states of consciousness with semi-structured nature experiences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (1978). Anticipatory set and setting stress incongruities as elicitors of mystical experiences in solitary nature settings. Journal for the Scientific Study, 17, 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (1992). Mysticism, reality, illusion and the Freudian critique of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (1995). (Review) Salvation on sand mountain: Snake handling and redemption in Southern Appalachia. Appalachian heritage (Summer, pp. 54–56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (2000). American psychology of religion and the journal for the scientific study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr., & Belzen, J. A. (2005). Research methods in the psychology of religion. In R. Paloutzian & C. Parks (Eds.), The handbook of religion and spirituality (pp. 61–79). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach, 4th ed. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr., & Williamson, W. P. (2008). Contemporary Christian serpent handlers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1902/1985). The varieties of religious experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1998). Major developments in five decades of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3–47). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1967). Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1968). A time to speak. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or the bane of contemporary psychology of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, N., Hack, A., & Walach, H. (2008). Measuring the unmeasurable by ticking boxes and opening Pandora’s box? Mixed methods research as a useful tool for investigating exceptional and spiritual experiences. Archiv für Religionspsychologie, 30, 155–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, P. (Ed.). (2006). The neurology of religious experience. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet (Vol. 2, pp. 33–54). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C. (1993). Social psychology in cross-cultural perspective. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichlos, D. E., & Chemel, B. R. (2006). The neuropharmacology of religious experience: Hallucinogens and the experience of the divine. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet (Vol. 3, pp. 1–34). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahnke, W. N. (1966). Drugs and mysticism. International Journal of Parapsychology, 8, 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., & Paloutzian, R. (2003). One step toward integration and an expansive future. In R. Paloutzian & C. Parks (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 550–564). New York: The McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloma, M. M. (2003). Main street mystics: The Toronto blessing and reviving Pentecostalism. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloma, M. M., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (1908). Blood and fire: Godly love in a Pentecostal emerging church. Rochester, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. V. (2006). Methodological atheism, methodological agnosticism and religious experience. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 36, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruyser, P. (1976). A dynamic psychology of religion. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1991). Experiencing research on new religions and cults. In W. Swatos & R. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork (pp. 62–71). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizutto, A. M. (1979). The birth of the living god. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secord, P. F. & Backman, C. W. (1964). Social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (Ed.). (2003). The secular revolution: Power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, W. T. (1961). Mysticism and philosophy. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, E. D. (1899). The psychology of religion: An empirical study of the growth of religious consciousness. New York: Charles Scribmner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1977). Development in “two social psychologies”: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamminen, K. (1991). Religious development in childhood and youth: An empirical study. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, G. M. (1968). The religious “nones”: A neglected category. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 7, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. M. (2003). A field in crisis. Is it time to start over? In H. M. Poelofsma, J. M. Corveleyn, & J. W. van Sane (Eds.), One hundred years of the psychology of religion (pp. 11–32). Amsterdam: VU University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, D., & Polzer, M. (1994). Ways of seeing ecstasy in modern society: Experimental-expressive and cultural-linguistic views. Sociology of Religion, 55, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, 37403, Chattanooga, TN, USA

    Ralph W. Hood Jr

Authors
  1. Ralph W. Hood Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph W. Hood Jr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National School of Religious Education, Australian Catholic University, 1200 Mair St, Ballarat Campus, 3350, Ballarat, VIC, Australia

    Marian de Souza

  2. Warwick Inst. Education, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, Coventry, UK

    Leslie J. Francis

  3. School of Education Studies, Dublin City University, Dublin, Glasnevin, Ireland

    James O’Higgins-Norman

  4. School of Child & Youth Care, University of Victoria, V8W 2Y2, Victoria, BC, Canada

    Daniel Scott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hood, R.W. (2009). Ways of Studying the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. In: de Souza, M., Francis, L.J., O’Higgins-Norman, J., Scott, D. (eds) International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing. International Handbooks of Religion and Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9018-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation