Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Multidimensionality of Students’ Epistemic Beliefs Across Diverse Cultures

  • Chapter
Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs

Abstract

Measurement is a critical issue in the study of individuals’ beliefs about knowledge. Given the prominence of the multidimensional conceptualization of epistemic beliefs, it is important to examine the multidimensional measures of beliefs more closely. An examination of literature reveals that although many studies have been conducted with the Schommer Epistemological Questionnaire or related measures, there are variations with regard to the number of identified factors and the nature of the beliefs those factors are meant to represent. Further, additional knowledge dimensions have been proposed and new measures of multidimensional beliefs have been developed. Although some variations are to be expected due to the measures used, age of the participants sampled, and the forms of analyses employed, the role of students’ cultural background must also be considered. In this chapter, I discuss the psychometric properties of the existing measures as well as how the factors that have been identified vary depending on the characteristics of participants and the analyses conducted. Emergent patterns from the existing studies and implications for refining and developing measures in future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartholome, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of the self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. A., Dunkle, M. E., & Schraw, G. (1994). Epistemological beliefs and reflective judgment. Psychological Reports, 75, 1595–1600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. A., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., & Stromso, H. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 539–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., Stromso, H., & Samuelstuen, M. (2005). The relationship between internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2004, July). Motivation and performance differences among domain-specific epistemological belief clusters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M., & Alexander, P. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain general or domain specific? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C., & Bond, L. (2004). The relationship between mothers’ beliefs about knowledge and their experiences in parent education. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25(4), 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 203–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2004). An integrated analysis of secondary school students’ conceptions and beliefs about learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., & Elliott, R. (2000). Exploratory study of epistemological beliefs of Hong Kong teacher education students: Resolving conceptual and empirical issues. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., & Elliott, R. G. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., & Elliott, R. (2004). Epistemological beliefs across cultures: Critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2001). The ParlEuNet-project: Problems with the validation of socio-constructivist design principles in ecological settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Luyten, L., & Bamps, H. (2001). Assessing epistemological beliefs: Schommer’s questionnaire revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. P., Goetz, E. T., &Willson, V. (2000). Epistemological beliefs of underprepared college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 31(1), 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A., Pintrich, P., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duell, O. K., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2001). Measures of people’s beliefs about knowledge and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 419–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, No. 07–069). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, A. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students’ epistemological beliefs in science. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (1999). Instructional context in the college mathematics classroom: Epistemological beliefs and student motivation. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 16, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, N., & Wallace, C. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4), 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. A. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal Educational Psychology, 92(2), 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, No. 07–014). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skill of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H. (2002). Effects of computer graphics types and epistemological beliefs on students’ learning of mathematical concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (3rd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, R. (2005). Teacher beliefs: The impact of the design of constructivist learning environments on instructor epistemologies. Learning Environments Research, 8(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2000). Role of anomalous data and epistemological beliefs in middle school students’ theory change about two controversial topics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, T., Sheehan, E., Cooney, J., & Smith, H. (1994). Conceptions of listening, learning processes, and epistemologies held by American, Irish, and Australian university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology:Integrating diversity with quantitative & qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning? Language Learning, 49(3), 377–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students” the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E., & Bendixen, L. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning. Journal of Staff, Program, & Organizational Development, 16(2), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt (Rinehart, & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G., & Pan, J. (2002). A comparison of epistemological beliefs and learning from science text between American and Chinese high school students. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 365–386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1995). Epistemological belief questionnaire for middle school students. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1998). The role of adults’ beliefs about knowledge in school, work, and everyday life. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development (pp. 127–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., & Dunnell., P. A. (1992, April). Epistemological beliefs among gifted and non-gifted students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., & Dunnell, P. A. (1994). A comparison of epistemological beliefs between gifted and non-gifted high school students. Roeper Press, 16, 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and math text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O., & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G., & Kardash, C. (2004). Teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J. (1989). Epistemological beliefs questionnaire. University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, Champaign, IL. [Unpublished raw data].

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 231–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, I. (2000). The culture specificity of epistemological beliefs about learning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn, I., Yang, K., & Choi, I. (2001). An analysis of the nature of epistemological beliefs: Investigating factors affecting the epistemological development of South Korean high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2(1), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W., & Velicer, W. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Virginia, USA

    Michelle M. Buehl

Authors
  1. Michelle M. Buehl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Murdoch University, Perth, Australia

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buehl, M.M. (2008). Assessing the Multidimensionality of Students’ Epistemic Beliefs Across Diverse Cultures. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation