Abstract
Taking as starting point the first textbook of classical genetics that clearly exemplifies all the features that Kuhn takes to be constitutive of a science textbook, Sinnott and Dunn’s (1925), as well as Darden’s (1991) and Schaffner’s (1980, 1986, 1993) analyses of the structure of biomedical and/or biological theories, I will discuss the problem of the existence of laws in biology. The framework of this discussion is provided by the structuralist conception of theories. The result of this analysis will be the identification of the fundamental law of classical genetics: the law of matching, which satisfies all weak necessary conditions for law-likeness that are postulated by the structuralist approach of theories, and the recognition of the so-called ‘Mendel’s Laws’ as special laws of classical genetics. This shows that the structuralist view is capable of providing an interesting perspective on genetics, which, in turn, has a positive influence on philosophy of science, because it shows we have a framework at hand in which important philosophical problems can fruitfully be addressed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balzer W (1979a) Die epistemologische Rolle des zweiten Newtonschen Axioms. Philosophia Naturalis 17:131–149.
Balzer W (1979b) Logische versus physikalische Definitionen in der physikalischen Begriffsbildung In: Balzer W, Kamlah A (eds) Aspekte der physikalischen Begriffsbildung. Theoretischer Begriffe und operationale Definitionen, Friedr. Vieweg and Sohn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 13–36.
Balzer W, Dawe CM (1990) Models for genetics. München Institut für Philosophie, Logik und issenschaftstheorie.
Balzer W, Lorenzano P (1997) The logical structure of classical genetics. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31:243–266.
Balzer W, Sneed J (1977/1978), Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories I and II. Studia Logica 36:195–211; 37, 167–194.
Balzer W, Moulines CU, Sneed J (1987) An architectonic for science. The Structuralist Program, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Balzer W, Moulines CU, Sneed J (eds) (2000) Structuralist knowledge representation: paradigmatic examples, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Bartelborth Th (1988) Eine logische Rekonstruktion der klassischen Elektrodynamik. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Beatty J (1980) Optimal-design models and the strategy of model building in evolutionary biology. Philos Sci 47:532–561.
Beatty J (1981) What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? In: Asquith PD, Nickles T (eds), PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, East Lansing, Michigan, 397–426.
Beatty J (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters G, Lennox J (eds) Theories and rationality in the biological sciences, the second annual pittsburgh/konstanz coloquim in the philosophy of science, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 45–81.
Bennett AJ (1964) Mendel’s Laws? School Science Review 46:35–42.
Bennett AJ (1965) Mendel and Mendelism: A Possible Reinterpretation. Journal of the Institute of Biology 12:72–74.
Beurton PJ, Falk R, Rheinberger H-J (eds) (2000) The concept of the gene in development and evolution, historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bowler P (1989) The mendelian revolution. The Athlone Press, London.
Brandon RN (1997) Does Biology Have Laws? The Experimental Evidence, Philos Sci 64, Proceedings, S444–S457.
Brandon RN (1978) Adaptation and evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Phil Sci 9:181–206.
Brandon RN (1981) A structural description of evolutionary biology. In: Asquith PD, Nickles T (eds) PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association, vol 2, East Lansing, Michigan pp 427–439.
Cadevall i Soler M (1988) La estructura de la teorìa de la evoluciòn. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra.
Correns C (1900) Gregor Mendels Regel über das Verhalten der Nachkommenschaft der Bastarde. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18:158–168.
Darden L (1991) Theory change in science. Strategies from Mendelian genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Darden L (1996) Essay review. Generalizations in biology. Kenneth F Schaffner, Discovery and explanations in biology and medicine, University of Chicago Press, Stud Hist Phil Sci 27(3):409–419.
Dawe CM (1982) The structure of genetics, Doctoral Dissertation, University of London, London.
Dìez JA, Lorenzano P (2002) La concepciòn estructuralista en el contexto de la filosofìa de la ciencia del siglo XX. In: Dìez JA, Lorenzano P (eds) Desarrollos actuales de la metateorìa estructuralista: problemas y discusiones, Quilmes: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/Universidad Autònoma de Zacatecas /Universidad Rovira i Virgili, pp 13–78.
Elgin M (2003) Biology and a priori laws. Philos Sci 70: 1380–1389.
Ereshefsky M (1991) The semantic approach to evolutionary theory. Biology and Philosophy 6:59–80.
Fleck L (1935) Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einfuhrung in die Lehre vom Denskstil und Denkkollektiv, Benno Schwabe and Co, Basel.
Fodor J (1974) Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28:97–116
Fodor J (1991) Hedged laws and psychological explanations. Mind 100:19–33.
Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life. The burgess shale and the ature of history, WW. Norton and Company, New York.
Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hempel CG, Oppenheim P (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philos Sci 15:135–175.
Hull D (1974) Philosophy of biological science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Keller EF (2000) The century of the gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kitcher P (1984) (1953) And all that: a tale of two sciences. The Philos Rev 93:335–373.
Kitcher P (1989) Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In: Kitcher P, Salmon WC (eds) Scientific explanation, minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol 13. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 410–505.
Kyburg HE (1968) Philosophy of science: a formal approach. The Macmillan Company, New York.
Kuhn TS (1959) The essential tension: tradition and innovation in scientific research. In: Taylor CW (ed) The third (1959) university of utah research conference on the identification of scientific talent, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 162–174; reissued in The essential tension. selected studies in scientific tradition and change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977, pp 225–239.
Kuhn TS (1962/1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New York.
Lindenmayer A, Simon N (1980) The formal structure of genetics and the reduction problem. In: Asquith PD, Giere RN (eds) PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp 160–170.
Lloyd E (1988) The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Greenwood Press, New York.
Lorenzano P (1995) Geschichte und Struktur der klassischen Genetik. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Lorenzano P (1997) Hacia una nueva interpretaciòn de la obra de Mendel. In: Ahumada J, Morey P (eds) Selecciòn de trabajos de las VII Jornadas de Epistemologìa e Historia de la Ciencia, Còrdoba: Facultad de Filosofìa y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Còrdoba, pp 220–231.
Lorenzano P (2000) Classical genetics and the theory-net of genetics. In: Balzer W, Moulines CU, Sneed J (eds) Structuralist knowledge representation: paradigmatic examples, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 251–284.
Lorenzano P (2001) On biological laws and the laws of biological sciences. Rev Pat Fil 2:29–43.
Lorenzano P (2002a) La teorìa del gen y la red teòrica de la genètica. In: Dìez JA, Lorenzano P (eds) Desarrollos actuales de la metateorìa estructuralista: problemas y discusiones, Quilmes: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/Universidad Autònoma de Zacatecas /Universidad Rovira i Virgili, pp 285–330.
Lorenzano P (2002b) Leyes fundamentales, refinamientos y especializaciones: del ‘Mendelismo’ a la ‘teorìa del gen’. In: Lorenzano P, Molina FT (eds) Filosofìa e Historia de la Ciencia en el Cono Sur, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Quilmes, pp 379–396.
Lorenzano P (2002c) Kenneth Schaffner, las teorìas de alcance intermedio y la concepciòn estructuralista de las teorìas, communication presented at the conference III Encuentro Iberoamericano sobre Metateorìa Estructural, Granada, España.
Lorenzano P (2006) Fundamental Laws and Laws of Biology. In: Ernst G, Niebergall K-G (eds.), Philosophie der Wissenschaft – Wissenschaft der Philosophie. Festschrift f?lises Moulines zum 60. Geburstag, Mentis-Verlag, Paderborn, 129–155.
Lorenzano P (2006) La emergencia de un programa de investigación genética. In: Lorenzano, P, Martins, LA-CP, Regner, AC (eds) Ciências da vida: estudos filosóficos e históricos, Associação de Filosofia e História da Ciência do Cone Sul (AFHIC), Campinas, pp 333–360.
Mayr E (1991a) Eine neue Philosophie der Biologie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Mayr E (1991b) One long argument: charles darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Morange M (2001) The misunderstood gene. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Morgan TH (1913) Heredity and sex. Columbia University Press, New York.
Morgan TH (1919) The physical basis of heredity. Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Moya A (1989) Sobre la estructura de la teorìa de la evoluciòn. Anthropos, Barcelona.
Mosterìn J (1984) Conceptos y teorìas en la ciencia. Alianza, Madrid, 2nd edn. 1987
Moulines CU (1978/1982) Forma y funciòn de los principios-guìa en las teorìas fìsicas. In: Exploraciones metacientìficas, Alianza, Madrid, pp 88–107 (first publication as Cuantificadores existenciales y principios-guìa en las teorìas fìsicas. Crìtica 10 (1978):59–88. Translated as Existential quantifiers and guiding principles in physical theories. In: Gracia JJE, Rabossi E, Villanueva E, Dascal M (eds) Philosophical analysis in latin america, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984:173–198).
Moulines CU (1991) Pluralidad y recursiòn. Alianza, Madrid.
Munson R (1975) Is biology a provincial science? Philos Sci 42:428–447.
Nägeli Cv (1884) Mechanisch-physiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre. R. Oldenburg, München and Leipzig.
Olby R (1979) Mendel no Mendelian? History of Science 17:57–72. Reissued in: Olby R (1985) Origins of Mendelism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition.
Rizzotti M, Zanardo A (1986) Axiomatization of genetics I and II. J Theor Biol 118:61–71, 145–172.
Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ruse M (1970) Are there laws in biology? Australas J Philos 48:234–246.
Ruse M (1973) The philosophy of biology. Hutchinson, London.
Salmon WC (1989) Four decades of scientific explanation. In: Kitcher P, Salmon WC (eds) Scientific explanation, minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol 13, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 3–219.
Sarkar S (1998) Genetics and reductionism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schaffner KF (1980) Theory structures in the biomedical sciences. The J Med Philos 5:57–97.
Schaffner KF (1986) Exemplar reasoning about biological models and diseases: a relation between the philosophy of medicine and philosophy of science. The J Med Philos 11:63–80.
Schaffner KF (1993) Discovery and explanations in biology and medicine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Schlick M (1918) Allgemeine erkenntnislehre. Julius Springer, Berlin
Sinnott EW, Dunn LC (1925) Principles of genetics: an elementary text, with problems. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edn. 1932; 3rd edn. 1939; with T Dobzhansky as co-author, 4th edn. 1950; 5th edn. 1958.
Sintonen M (1991) How evolutionary theory faces the reality. Synthese 89:163–183.
Smart JJC (1963) Philosophy and scientific realism. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Sneed JD (1971) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Reidel, Dordrecht, 2nd revised edn. 1979.
Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober E (1993) Philosophy of biology. Westview Press, Boulder.
Sober E (1997) Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philos Sci 64, Proceedings, S458–S467.
Stegmüller W (1973) Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik. Springer, Heidelberg.
Stegmüller W (1976) Eine ‘subjektivistische’ Variante des Begriffs der physikalischen Theorie. In: Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York 1980, pp 56–86.
Stegmüller W (1978) A combined approach to the dynamics of theories. Boston studies in the philosophy of science 59/136:151–186.
Stegmüller W (1979a) The structuralist view: survey, recent development and answers to some criticisms. In: Niiniluoto I, Tuomela R (eds) The logic and epistemology of scientific change (Acta Philosophica Fennica 30), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 113–129.
Stegmüller W (1979b) The structuralist view of theories. Springer, Berlin.
Stegmüller W (1983) Erklärung–Begründung–Kausalität, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 2nd edn. extended and modified.
Stegmüller W (1986) Theorie und Erfahrung, Band II, Dritter Halbband, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York.
Swartz N (1995) The neo-humean perspective: laws as regularities. In: Weinert F (ed) Laws of nature. essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 67–91.
Thompson P (1989) The structure of biological theories. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Tuomi J (1981) Structure and dynamics of darwinian evolutionary theory. Syst Zool 30:22–31.
Tuomi JyEH (1979) An analysis of natural selection in models of life-history theory. Savonia 3:9–16.
van Fraassen B (1977) The only necessity is verbal necessity. J Philos 74:71–85.
van Fraassen B (1989), Laws and symmetry. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford.
van Fraassen B (1993) Armstrong, Cartwright, and Earman on Laws and Symmetry. Philos Phenomenol Res LIII (2):431–444.
Vries H de (1900a) Sur la loi de disjonction des hybrides. Comptes Rendus de l’Acadèmie des Sciences 130:845–847.
Vries de H (1900b) Das Spaltungsgesetz der Bastarde. Ber Deut Botan Ges 18:83–90.
Wassermann GD (1981) On the nature of the theory of evolution. Philos Sci 48:416–437.
Weinert F (ed) (1995) Laws of nature. Essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Williams MB (1970) Deducing the consequences of evolution: a mathematical model. J Theor Biol 29:343–385.
Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophische untersuchungen/philosophical investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Woodger JH (1959) Studies in the foundations of genetics. In: Henkin L, Suppes P, Tarski A (eds) The axiomatic method, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 408–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lorenzano, P. (2007). The Influence of Genetics on Philosophy of Science. In: Fagot-Largeault, A., Rahman, S., Torres, J.M. (eds) The Influence of Genetics on Contemporary Thinking. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5664-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5664-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5663-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5664-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)