Abstract
The contemporary issue of students’ interest in science has caught the attention of both the current large-scale, international science assessment projects, Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Programme for International Study Assessment (Reading, Mathematics and Science (PISA). The manner in which these student attributes have been measured in TIMSS has, however, suffered from a number of methodological inadequacies. As just one small part of very large data collections the instruments used do not measure up to those that are now expected for these affective attributes by main stream researchers. Furthermore, the project’s findings lack specificity in relation to both the target of the affect and in terms of the students’ experiences with science with which their affect can be associated. Accordingly, the findings hitherto provide little insight into what curriculum authorities could do to counteract the now alarming lack of interest in science among students in the more developed countries. The PISA Science project for 2006 is committed to correct some of these weaknesses and its approach, in which affect is now explicitly an expected outcome of learning science, is described. PISA Science has already confirmed the role of Science as A Story as an approach to teaching/learning that may have positive affective outcomes
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aikenhead, G.S. (2005) Science for Everyday Life: Evidence – based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bauer, M. and Schon, I. (1993) Mapping variety in public understanding of science, Public Understanding of Science, 2(2), 141–155.
Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicholson, P., Ramsden, J. and Waddington, D. (1994) Science the salters’ approach – A case study of the process of large scale curriculum development, Science Education, 78(5), 415–447.
Gardner, P.L. (1975) Attitudes to Science: A review, Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.
Hoffmann, L., Krapp, A., Renniger, K.A. and Baumert, J. (eds.) Interest and Learning. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Kjærnsli, M. and Lie, S. (1999) PISA and Scientific Literacy: Similarities and differences between the Nordic countries, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271–286.
Klainin, S. and Fensham, P.J. (1989) 1989 achievements by girls in physics learning, International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 101–112.
Lindahl, B. (2003) Pupils’ Responses to School Science and Technology? (Published dissertation), Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothobugensis.
Lyons, T. (2006) Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words, International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–614.
Malcolm, C. (ed.) (1996) Could We? Should We? Science for Year 10. Carlton, Vic., Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
Millar, R. (2006) 2006 first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science, International Journal of Science Education, 28(13) 1523–1544.
OECD (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2004) Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2001) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical literacy: A Framework for PISA Paris: OECD.
Ogura, Y. (2003) Informal Science Education for Promoting Children’s Science Learning in Japan. Paper presented at 2003 International Seminar on Improvement of Students’ Science Achievement and Attitude through Informal Science Education, Seoul, Korea, December 5–6.
Osborne, J. and Collins, S. (2001) Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study, International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 448–467.
Sjøberg, S. and Schreiner, C. (2006) How do learners in different cultures relate toscience and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the relevance of Science Education), APFSLT: Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1) Foreword.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fensham, P.J. (2007). Interest in Science: Lessons and non-lessons from TIMSS and PISA. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5031-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5032-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)