Skip to main content

Interest in Science: Lessons and non-lessons from TIMSS and PISA

  • Conference paper
Contributions from Science Education Research

Abstract

The contemporary issue of students’ interest in science has caught the attention of both the current large-scale, international science assessment projects, Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Programme for International Study Assessment (Reading, Mathematics and Science (PISA). The manner in which these student attributes have been measured in TIMSS has, however, suffered from a number of methodological inadequacies. As just one small part of very large data collections the instruments used do not measure up to those that are now expected for these affective attributes by main stream researchers. Furthermore, the project’s findings lack specificity in relation to both the target of the affect and in terms of the students’ experiences with science with which their affect can be associated. Accordingly, the findings hitherto provide little insight into what curriculum authorities could do to counteract the now alarming lack of interest in science among students in the more developed countries. The PISA Science project for 2006 is committed to correct some of these weaknesses and its approach, in which affect is now explicitly an expected outcome of learning science, is described. PISA Science has already confirmed the role of Science as A Story as an approach to teaching/learning that may have positive affective outcomes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikenhead, G.S. (2005) Science for Everyday Life: Evidence – based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. and Schon, I. (1993) Mapping variety in public understanding of science, Public Understanding of Science, 2(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicholson, P., Ramsden, J. and Waddington, D. (1994) Science the salters’ approach – A case study of the process of large scale curriculum development, Science Education, 78(5), 415–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P.L. (1975) Attitudes to Science: A review, Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, L., Krapp, A., Renniger, K.A. and Baumert, J. (eds.) Interest and Learning. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnsli, M. and Lie, S. (1999) PISA and Scientific Literacy: Similarities and differences between the Nordic countries, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klainin, S. and Fensham, P.J. (1989) 1989 achievements by girls in physics learning, International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, B. (2003) Pupils’ Responses to School Science and Technology? (Published dissertation), Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothobugensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006) Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words, International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, C. (ed.) (1996) Could We? Should We? Science for Year 10. Carlton, Vic., Australia: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (2006) 2006 first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science, International Journal of Science Education, 28(13) 1523–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical literacy: A Framework for PISA Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura, Y. (2003) Informal Science Education for Promoting Children’s Science Learning in Japan. Paper presented at 2003 International Seminar on Improvement of Students’ Science Achievement and Attitude through Informal Science Education, Seoul, Korea, December 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. and Collins, S. (2001) Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study, International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 448–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, S. and Schreiner, C. (2006) How do learners in different cultures relate toscience and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the relevance of Science Education), APFSLT: Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1) Foreword.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fensham, P.J. (2007). Interest in Science: Lessons and non-lessons from TIMSS and PISA. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics