Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, T., & Twining, W. (1991). Analysis of evidence. Boston: Little, Brown.
Gates, H.L. (1998). Thirteen ways of looking at a black man. New York: Vintage.
Hart, H.L.A., & Honore, A.M. (1959). Causation in the law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hastie, R. (1999). The role of “stories” in civil jury judgments. Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 32(2), 1–13.
Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1996). The O.J. Simpson stories: Behavioral scientists look at The People v. O.J. Simpson trial. University of Colorado Law Review, 67, 957–976.
Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (2000). Explanation-based decision making. In T. Connolly, H.R. Arkes, & K.R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (2nd ed., pp. 212–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, R., Schkade, D.A., & Payne, J.W. (1998). A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 287–314. (Also: Hastie, R., Schkade, D.A., & Payne, J.W. (1999). Reply to Vidmar. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 715–718)
Mauet, T.A. (1992). Fundamentals of trial techniques (3rd ed.) Boston: Little, Brown.
McKenzie, C.R.M., Lee, S.M., & Chen, K.K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: Change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 1–18.
Mixon, K.D., Foley, L.A., & Orme, K. (1995). The influence of racial similarity on the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 481–490.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1981). Juror decision making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 246–287.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: The effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The Story Model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–557.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123–163. (Reprinted in P.N. Johnson-Laird & E. Shafir (Eds.). (1994). Reasoning and decision making. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell)
Roese, N.J., & Olson, J.M. (Ed.). (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spellman, B.A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 323–348.
Toobin, J. (1995). A horrible human event. The New Yorker, 40 (October 23), 41–49.
Wells, G.L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hastie, R. (2008). What’s the Story?. In: Bornstein, B.H., Wiener, R.L., Schopp, R.F., Willborn, S.L. (eds) Civil Juries and Civil Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74488-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74490-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)