Skip to main content

Integrating School-Aged ESL Learners into the Mainstream Curriculum

  • Chapter
International Handbook of English Language Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 15))

Abstract

The concept of integrating ESL learners into the mainstream curriculum has been the subject of debate amongst educationalists and policy makers in many parts of the English-speaking countries in the past 30 years. The issues concerning the integration of ESL students into the mainstream curriculum are multi-dimensional—the label of ESL itself appears to be part linguistic, part educational, part social, and part political. The main purpose of this chapter is to give an account of the multidimensionality of ESL curriculum and practice. The developments in ESL curriculum and pedagogy within the mainstream education system will be looked at first. The influences of wider concerns such as social integration, and rights and entitlements to equal opportunity in public provision will be discussed next. Recent experiences in California, England, and Victoria will be drawn on to illustrate the multi-dimensional nature of ESL policy and practice. This chapter will conclude with some deliberations on the formulation of an analytical framework that may be used to critically examine any ESL curriculum and practice. The central assumption throughout this chapter is that ESL in mainstream schooling can only be understood properly if we pay attention to its unique position at the crossroads of educational, social, and ideological movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashworth, M. (2000). Effective teachers, effective schools: Second language teaching in Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Toronto: Pippin Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azurmendi, M.-J., Bachoc, E., & Zabaleta, F. (2001). Reversing language shift: The case of Basque. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Can threatened languages be saved? (pp. 234–259). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardsmore, H. B. (1993). The European School model. In H. B. Beardsmore (Ed.), European models of bilingual education (pp. 121–154). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies (1999). The ESL Companion to the English Curriculum and Standards Framework (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Board of Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J. (1989). Moving into the mainstream: LEA provision for bilingual pupils. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. J., & McMeniman, M. (1985). Bridging the language gap: Ideals and realities pertaining to learning English as a second language (ESL). Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A., & O’Malley, J. (1987). The cognitive academic learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A., & O’Malley, M. (1992). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. In P. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content area teachers (pp. 39–57). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. (1986). The education of linguistic and cultural minorities in the OECD countries. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, B., & Evans, R. (1984). ESL topic books: Learning English through general science. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Racial Equality. (1986). Teaching English as a second language. London: CRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. (1987). ESL through content-area instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J., Spanos, G., Christian, D., Simich-Dudgeon, C., & Willetts, K. (1987). Integrating language and content instruction for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearing House for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (1997). Best evidence: Research foundations of the Bilingual Education Act. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 16–26). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario: California Association of Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingualism in education. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, T. C., & Cuevas, G. J. (1987). Integrating language and mathematics learning. In J. Crandall (Ed.), ESL through content-area instruction: Mathematics, science, social studies (pp. 9–54). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2001). Current policies, programs and practice in school ESL. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 30–50). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001). Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National strategy — Framework for teaching English: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — Literacy across the curriculum (Chapter 12 — All inclusive: Supporting EAL learners) [Videotape]. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — literacy across the curriculum. London: DfEE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2002). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — Grammar for writing: Supporting pupils learning EAL. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education, Employment, and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). English — The national curriculum for England. London: DfEE and QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1985). Education for all: The report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups — (Chair: Lord Swann). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1991) Partnership teaching. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R., & Cleland, B. (n.d.). The topic approach to E.S.L. [Video]. Victoria: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, P. (2000). In the aftermath of the storm: English learners in the post-227 era. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. (2000). Informed parent consent and Proposition 227. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • García, E. E., & Curry-Rodriguez, J. E. (2000). The education of limited English proficient students in California schools: An assessment of the influence of proposition 227 in selected districts and schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Leung, C., & Rampton, B. (2001). Globalisation, diaspora and language education in England. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalisation and language teaching (pp. 29–46). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoddinott, D. (1998). Literacy—Meeting the needs of all learners. Australian Council of TESOL Associations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, A. M. (1997). English for specific purposes and content-based instruction: What is the relationship? In M. A. Snow & D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 363–366). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1996). A gradual exit, variable threshold model for limited English proficient children. NABE News, 19(1), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (2001). Are children ready for the mainstream after one year of structured English immersion? TESOL Matters, 11(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2001). English as an additional language: Distinctive language focus or diffused curriculum concerns? Language and Education, 15(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2002). Reception classes for immigrant students — England. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Bianco, J. (1998, April/May/June). ESL... Is it migrant literacy?... Is it history? Australian Language Matters, pp. 1, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. (1998). The literacy benchmarks and ESL. Australian Council of TESOL Associations.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, M. (Ed.). (1996). Developing pedagogies in the multilingual classroom: The writings of Josie Levine. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, A. (1990). LEP students and the integration of language and content: Knowledge structures and tasks. In C. Simich-Dudgeon (Ed.), Proceedings of the first research symposium on limited English proficient students’ issues (pp. 113–160). Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. (2001). The second language as a medium of learning. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 107–126). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (Eds.). (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning, and identity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education. (2001). Inspecting English as an additional language: 11–16 with guidance on self-evaluation. London: OFSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, J. D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (1996). Teaching English as an additional language: A framework for policy. London: SCAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scope. (1978). An introductory English course for immigrant children. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (Ed.). (1995). Multilingualism for all. Lisse, NL: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1992). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content instruction. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 27–38). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the ‘politics of recognition’. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Language and Education, The George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Retrieved 4th September 2004, from http://www.crede.ussc.edu/research/llaa/1.l_final.html.

  • Townsend, H. (1971). Immigrant pupils in England: The LEA response. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unz, R. K. (1997, October 19). Bilingualism vs. bilingual education. Los Angeles Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unz, R. K. (1999). California and the end of white America. Retrieved 4th October, 2004, from http://www.onenation.org/9911/110199.html.

  • Widdowson, H. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1998). Finding and showing the way: Teaching ESL in the late 1990s: Australian Council of TESOL Associations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (Ed.). (2000). Language revitalization: Policy and planning in Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational action. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leung, C. (2007). Integrating School-Aged ESL Learners into the Mainstream Curriculum. In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics