Abstract
The concept of integrating ESL learners into the mainstream curriculum has been the subject of debate amongst educationalists and policy makers in many parts of the English-speaking countries in the past 30 years. The issues concerning the integration of ESL students into the mainstream curriculum are multi-dimensional—the label of ESL itself appears to be part linguistic, part educational, part social, and part political. The main purpose of this chapter is to give an account of the multidimensionality of ESL curriculum and practice. The developments in ESL curriculum and pedagogy within the mainstream education system will be looked at first. The influences of wider concerns such as social integration, and rights and entitlements to equal opportunity in public provision will be discussed next. Recent experiences in California, England, and Victoria will be drawn on to illustrate the multi-dimensional nature of ESL policy and practice. This chapter will conclude with some deliberations on the formulation of an analytical framework that may be used to critically examine any ESL curriculum and practice. The central assumption throughout this chapter is that ESL in mainstream schooling can only be understood properly if we pay attention to its unique position at the crossroads of educational, social, and ideological movements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashworth, M. (2000). Effective teachers, effective schools: Second language teaching in Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Toronto: Pippin Publishing Corporation.
Azurmendi, M.-J., Bachoc, E., & Zabaleta, F. (2001). Reversing language shift: The case of Basque. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Can threatened languages be saved? (pp. 234–259). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.
Beardsmore, H. B. (1993). The European School model. In H. B. Beardsmore (Ed.), European models of bilingual education (pp. 121–154). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Board of Studies (1999). The ESL Companion to the English Curriculum and Standards Framework (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Board of Studies.
Bourne, J. (1989). Moving into the mainstream: LEA provision for bilingual pupils. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Campbell, W. J., & McMeniman, M. (1985). Bridging the language gap: Ideals and realities pertaining to learning English as a second language (ESL). Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.
Chamot, A., & O’Malley, J. (1987). The cognitive academic learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227–249.
Chamot, A., & O’Malley, M. (1992). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. In P. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content area teachers (pp. 39–57). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Churchill, S. (1986). The education of linguistic and cultural minorities in the OECD countries. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cleland, B., & Evans, R. (1984). ESL topic books: Learning English through general science. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Commission for Racial Equality. (1986). Teaching English as a second language. London: CRE.
Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crandall, J. (1987). ESL through content-area instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Crandall, J., Spanos, G., Christian, D., Simich-Dudgeon, C., & Willetts, K. (1987). Integrating language and content instruction for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearing House for Bilingual Education.
Crawford, J. (1997). Best evidence: Research foundations of the Bilingual Education Act. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 16–26). New York: Longman.
Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario: California Association of Bilingual Education.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingualism in education. New York: Longman.
Dale, T. C., & Cuevas, G. J. (1987). Integrating language and mathematics learning. In J. Crandall (Ed.), ESL through content-area instruction: Mathematics, science, social studies (pp. 9–54). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Davison, C. (2001). Current policies, programs and practice in school ESL. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 30–50). London: Longman.
Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001). Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity. London: Longman.
Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National strategy — Framework for teaching English: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE.
Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — Literacy across the curriculum (Chapter 12 — All inclusive: Supporting EAL learners) [Videotape]. London: DfEE.
Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — literacy across the curriculum. London: DfEE Publications.
Department of Education and Skills. (2002). Key Stage 3 National Strategy — Grammar for writing: Supporting pupils learning EAL. London: DfES.
Department for Education, Employment, and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). English — The national curriculum for England. London: DfEE and QCA.
Department of Education and Science. (1985). Education for all: The report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups — (Chair: Lord Swann). London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science. (1991) Partnership teaching. London: DES.
Evans, R., & Cleland, B. (n.d.). The topic approach to E.S.L. [Video]. Victoria: Ministry of Education.
Gándara, P. (2000). In the aftermath of the storm: English learners in the post-227 era. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).
Garcia, A. (2000). Informed parent consent and Proposition 227. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).
García, E. E., & Curry-Rodriguez, J. E. (2000). The education of limited English proficient students in California schools: An assessment of the influence of proposition 227 in selected districts and schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2).
Harris, R., Leung, C., & Rampton, B. (2001). Globalisation, diaspora and language education in England. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalisation and language teaching (pp. 29–46). London: Routledge.
Hoddinott, D. (1998). Literacy—Meeting the needs of all learners. Australian Council of TESOL Associations.
Johns, A. M. (1997). English for specific purposes and content-based instruction: What is the relationship? In M. A. Snow & D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 363–366). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. New York: Longman.
Krashen, S. (1996). A gradual exit, variable threshold model for limited English proficient children. NABE News, 19(1), 15–18.
Krashen, S. (2001). Are children ready for the mainstream after one year of structured English immersion? TESOL Matters, 11(1), 4.
Leung, C. (2001). English as an additional language: Distinctive language focus or diffused curriculum concerns? Language and Education, 15(1), 33–55.
Leung, C. (2002). Reception classes for immigrant students — England. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 93–98.
Lo Bianco, J. (1998, April/May/June). ESL... Is it migrant literacy?... Is it history? Australian Language Matters, pp. 1, 6–7.
McKay, P. (1998). The literacy benchmarks and ESL. Australian Council of TESOL Associations.
May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. London: Longman.
Meek, M. (Ed.). (1996). Developing pedagogies in the multilingual classroom: The writings of Josie Levine. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Mohan, A. (1990). LEP students and the integration of language and content: Knowledge structures and tasks. In C. Simich-Dudgeon (Ed.), Proceedings of the first research symposium on limited English proficient students’ issues (pp. 113–160). Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs.
Mohan, B. (2001). The second language as a medium of learning. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 107–126). London: Longman.
Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (Eds.). (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning, and identity. London: Longman.
Office for Standards in Education. (2001). Inspecting English as an additional language: 11–16 with guidance on self-evaluation. London: OFSTED.
Ramírez, J. D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16, 1–62.
School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (1996). Teaching English as an additional language: A framework for policy. London: SCAA.
Scope. (1978). An introductory English course for immigrant children. London: Longman.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (Ed.). (1995). Multilingualism for all. Lisse, NL: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V.
Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1992). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content instruction. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 27–38). New York: Longman.
Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the ‘politics of recognition’. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Language and Education, The George Washington University.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Retrieved 4th September 2004, from http://www.crede.ussc.edu/research/llaa/1.l_final.html.
Townsend, H. (1971). Immigrant pupils in England: The LEA response. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Unz, R. K. (1997, October 19). Bilingualism vs. bilingual education. Los Angeles Times.
Unz, R. K. (1999). California and the end of white America. Retrieved 4th October, 2004, from http://www.onenation.org/9911/110199.html.
Widdowson, H. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, A. (1998). Finding and showing the way: Teaching ESL in the late 1990s: Australian Council of TESOL Associations.
Williams, C. (Ed.). (2000). Language revitalization: Policy and planning in Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational action. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leung, C. (2007). Integrating School-Aged ESL Learners into the Mainstream Curriculum. In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-46300-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-46301-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)