Skip to main content

Measuring Police Integrity

  • Chapter
Enhancing Police Integrity
  • 871 Accesses

Abstract

To measure police integrity, we designed and pretested a questionnaire that sought to answer in a systematic, standardized, quantitative manner the five questions presented at the end of the last chapter. These questions, and the action response they demand, are crucial to both an organizational/occupational-culture theory of police integrity. At the same time, they satisfy some basic informational needs of practical police administration:

  1. 1.

    Do officers in this agency know the rules?

  2. 2.

    How strongly do they support those rules?

  3. 3.

    Do they know what disciplinary threat this agency makes for violation of those rules?

  4. 4.

    Do they think the discipline is fair?

  5. 5.

    How willing are they to report misconduct?

The questionnaire presented police officers with eleven hypothetical case scenarios. The scenarios, displayed in Exhibit 2.1, cover a range of corrupt behavior from that which merely gives an appearance of a conflict of interest (Case 1) to incidents of bribery (Case 3) and theft (Cases 5 and 11).

Portions of this chapter are based upon work previously reported in Carl. B. Klockars, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, William E. Harver, and Maria R. Haberfeld, The Measurement of Police Integrity, (Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, August 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. To provide our respondents with descriptions of various types of police corruption, we relied on the typology of police corruption developed by Barker and his colleagues (see Thomas Barker and Julian Roebuck, An Empirical Typology of Police Corruption (Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas, 1973); Tom Barker and Robert O. Wells, “Police Administrators’ Attitudes Toward the Definition and Control of Police Deviance,” 51 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (1982)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sanja Kutnjak Ivković and Carl Klockars, “Attitudes on Police Corruption: Does Length of Service Make a Difference?” A paper presented to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Annual Meeting. March 1997. 39 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Measuring Police Integrity. In: Enhancing Police Integrity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36956-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics