Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CTC: indicazioni cliniche e vantaggi

  • Chapter
La colografia virtuale con TC multistrato (CTC)

  • 222 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Dachman AH. Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:260–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: Imaging features with colonoscopy correlation. AJR 1998; 170:1303–1309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT. First international symposium on virtual colonoscopy. AJR 1999; 173:565–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Akekar GA, Yee J, Mc Quaid K, et al. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:310–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards JT, Foster NM, Mendelson RM, et al. Acceptability of virtual colonoscopy as a community-based screen test in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16(suppl):A3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forbes GM, Mendelson RM. Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2000; 32:272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galandiuk S, Ahmad P. Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy. Dig Surg 1998; 15:60–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, et al. Virtual endoscopy: comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy 2000; 32:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ransohoff DF. Virtual Colonoscopy — What it can do vs what it will do. JAMA 2004; 1772–1774

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, et al. Patients preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:578–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002; 222:337–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: What is the real issue? Eur Radiol 2002; 12(6):1410–1415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:693–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leferee PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography; initial results, polyps detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002; 224:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pochaczevsky R. Stool tagging with barium for CT colonography. Radiology 2001; 221:850–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:646–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, et al. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction in CT colonography: initial observations. Radiology 2003; 226:911–917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TEM, et al. Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 2003; 52:1744–1747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hara AK, Johnson CD, McCarty RL, et al. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000; 215:353–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hellstrom M, Svensson MH, Lasson A. Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). AJR 2004; 182:631–638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brady AP, Stevenson GW, Stevenson I. Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing, perpetual problem. Radiology 1994; 373–378

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dachman AH, Yoshida H. Virtual colonoscopy: past, present and future. Radiol Clin N Am 2003; 41:377–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macari M, Megibow AJ, Barman P, et al. CT colonography in patients with failed colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:561–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrel RJ, et al. Endoluminal CT colonography after incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:913–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223:615–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Trenna S, et al. Colonscopia virtuale multistrato nella valutazione dei tumori del colon-retto. Radiol Med 2002; 104:394–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yee J, Akekar GA, Hung RK, et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristic of CT colonography for detection in 300 patient. Radiology 2001; 219:685–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 1999; 210:423–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003; 227:378–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Macari M, Edmund JB, Stacy LJ, et al. Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo-and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesion, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly). Radiographics 2003; 23:1073–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mackenzie S, Vallance R, O’Dwyer PJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 342:737–739

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bat L, Neumann G, Shemesh E, et al. The associations of synchronous neoplasm with occluding colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28:149–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tate JJT, Rawlinson J, Royle GT, et al. Preoperative or postoperative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1988; 75:1016–1018

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi, et al. Preoperative T and N Staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography-initial experience. Radiology 2004; 231:83–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, et al. Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1991; 180:313–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Glick S, Wagner JL, Johnson CD. Cost-effectiveness of double contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:629–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith GA, O’Dwyer PJ. Sensitivity of double contrast enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasm. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:649–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2000; 372:1766–1772

    Google Scholar 

  39. Geen RWF, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, et al. CT and MR scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics 2003; 24:e 18

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Pelkonen P, et al. Detection of mass lesion with MR colonography. Radiology 1998; 207:59–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lauenstein T, Holtman G, Schoenfelder D, et al. MR colonography without cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(4):823–827

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, et al. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema. Radiology 2001; 219:558–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor SA, Halligan S, O’Donnel C, et al. Cardiovascular effects at multidetector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon. Radiology 2003; 229:782–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bilotta JJ, Floyd Jl, Aye JD, et al. Arterial oxygen desaturation during ambulatory colonoscopy: predictability, incidence and clinical insignificance. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  45. Eastwood GL. ECG abnormalities associated with the barium enema. JAMA 1972; 219:719–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Herman LL, Kurtz RC, McKee KJ, et al. Risk factors associated with vasovagal reactions during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39:388–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Mattila M, et al. Conscious sedation and cardiorespiratory safety during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:48–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson AM, Park KG, Kerr F, et al. Safety of fibreoptic endoscopy: analysis of cardiorespiratory events. Br J Surg 1992; 79:1046–1049

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Coady-Fariborzian L, Angel LP, Procaccino JA. Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1247–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kamar M, Portnoy O, Bar-Dayan A. Actual colonic perforation in virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1242–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Glick SN. Large colonic neoplasm missed by endoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152:513–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nelson JA, Daniels AU, Dodds WJ. Rectal balloons: complication causes and recommendations. Invest Radiol 1979; 14:48–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tran DQ, Rosen L, Kim R, et al. Actual colonoscopy: what are the risks of perforation? Am Surg 2001; 67:845–848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Williams SM, Harned RK. Recognition and prevention of barium enema complications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 1991; 20:123–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355:1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. Detection of flat lesion in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:292–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mc Farland EG, Brink JA, Pilgram TK, et al. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two and three-dimensional image display technique. Radiology 2001; 218:375–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon disease: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:394–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Johnson CD, Dachman AH. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 2000; 216:331–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Morrin MM, LaMont JT. Screening virtual colonoscopy — ready for prime time? N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2261–2264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening, scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289:1288–1296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ferrucci JT. Screening of colon cancer: programs of the American College of Radiology. AJR Am J Roentegenol 1993; 160:999–1003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ferrucci JT. Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:975–988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Sauders BP, et al. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examination, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. AJR 2003; 181:913–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO. Randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet: 1996; 384:1472–1477

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG. One time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:555–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Lieberman DA, Wiess DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:162–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Podolsky DK. Going the distance: the case for true colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:207–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Glick S. Double-contrast barium enema for colorectal cancer screening: a review of the issue and a comparison with other screening alternative. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1529–1537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003; 125(3):688–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1978–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Habr-Gama A, Wayne JD. Complication and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 1989; 13:193–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gelfand DW, Chen MYM, Ott DJ. Benign colorectal neoplasm undetected by colonoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17:344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Hixon LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (Virtual colonoscopy). A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291(14):1713–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(7):524

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, et al. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. GUT 2002; 51:207–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125(2):311–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Laghi A, Iannacone R, Carbone I, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2002; 34(6):441–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy in 165 patients. Am J Surg 2002; 183:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Macari M, Bini E, Milano A, et al. Prospective comparison of thin sections low-dose multislice CT colonography to conventional colonoscopy in detection colorectal polyps and cancers. Radiology 2002; 224:383–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA, et al. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 2002; 225:380–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, et al. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1384–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Pickardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191–220

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125(2):304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brian JH, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopy removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 2000; 328:901–906

    Google Scholar 

  87. Bresalier RS, Kim YS. Malignant neoplasm of the large intestine. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS (eds). Gastrointestinal disease. 5°ed Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1993; 1449–1494

    Google Scholar 

  88. Day DW, Morson BC. The adenoma-carcinoma sequence. In: Morson BC, ed. The pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1978; 58–71

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gelfand DW. Decreasing risk of subsequent colonic cancer in patient undergoing polypectomy after barium enema: analysis based on data from the pre-endoscopy era. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1243–1245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly FL, et al. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average risk asymptomatic subjects: community based study. Radiology 2004; 230:459–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Macari M. Bini, EJ, Stacy LJ, et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average — risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 2004; 230:629–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1181–1184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003; 229:775–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002; 224:25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Fletcher JG. Future directions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:301–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch T, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: a prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 217:765–771

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hara AK, Johnson CD, McCarty RL, et al. CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001; 219:461–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Obuchowsky NA, Graham RJ, Baker ME, et al. Ten criteria for effective screening; their application to multislice CT for pulmonary and colorectal cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1357–1362

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, et al. Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology 1999; 210:645–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, et al. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001; 219:51–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Yoshida H, Nappi N, McEneaney P, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 2002; 22:963–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Summers RM. Challenges for computed aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Abdom Radiol 2002; 27:268–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek KM. Colonic polyps: role of computed-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002; 225(2):391–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Yoshida H, Masutani Y, McEneaney P, et al. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 2002; 222(2):327–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andrea Caprotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caprotti, A. (2005). CTC: indicazioni cliniche e vantaggi. In: La colografia virtuale con TC multistrato (CTC). Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0355-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0355-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0301-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0355-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation