Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemiology

  • Chapter
Contact Dermatitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  • Menné T, Began O, Green A (1982) Nickel allergy and hand dermatitis in a stratified sample of the Danish female population: an epidemiological study including a statistic appendix. Acta Derm Venereol 62:35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Berg M, Axelson O (1990) Evaluation of a questionnaire for facial skin complaints related to work at visual display units. Contact Dermatitis 22:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004) www.bls.gov/iff/home.htm

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bock M, Schmidt A, Bruckner T, Diepgen TL (2003) Occupational skin disease in the construction industry. Br J Dermatol 149:1165–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Charman C, Williams H (2000) Outcome measures of disease severity in atopic eczema. Arch Dermatol 136:763–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherry N, Meyer JD, Adisesh A, Brooke R, Owen-Smith V, Swales C, Beck MH (2000) Surveillance of occupational skin disease: EPIDERM and OPRA. Br J Dermatol 142:1128–1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (1998) Risk for hand eczema in employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (2003) Problems with trials and intervention studies on barrier creams and emollients at the workplace. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coenraads PJ, Nater JP, van der Lende R (1983) Prevalence of eczema and other dermaloses of the hands and arms in the Netherlands. Association with age and occupation. Clin Exp Dermatol 8:495–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coenraads PJ, Nater JP, Jansen HA, Lantinga H (1984) Prevalence of eczema and other dermaloses of the hands and forearms in construction workers in the Netherlands. Clin Exp Dermatol 9:149–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers. Contact Dermatitis 20:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational skin diseases in Nothern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population based study. Br J Dermatol 145:453–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dickel H, Bruckner T, Berhard-Klimt C, Koch T, Scheidt R, Diepgen TL (2002) Surveillance scheme for occupational skin disease in the Saarland, FRG: first report from BKH-S. Contact Dermatitis 46:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2002) Impact of preventive strategies on trend of occupational skin disease in hairdressers: population-based register study. Br Med J 324:1422–1423

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2003) Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. J Invest Dermatol 121:37–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diepgen TL (2003) Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (2000) The impact of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of patch testing: the more you test, the more you get? Contact Dermatitis 42:315–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Diepgen TL, Drexler H (2004) Skin cancer and occupational skin disease. Hautarzt 55:22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A (2002) Werden Inzidenz und Prävalenz berufsbedingter Hauterkrankungen unterschätzt? Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 37:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  19. Funke U, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (2001) Incidence of work-related hand eczema during apprenticeship: first results of a prospective cohort study in the car industry. Contact Dermatitis 44:166–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruvberger B, Isaksson M, Frick M, Ponten A, Bruze M (2003) Occupational dermatoses in a metalworking plant. Contact Dermatitis 48:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo YL, Wang BJ, Yeh KC, Wang JC, Kao HH, Wang MT, Shih HC, Chen CJ (1999) Dermatoses in cement workers in southern Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis 40:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Halkier-Sorensen L (1996) Occupational skin diseases. Contact Dermatitis 35[Suppl 1]:1–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hogberg M, Wahlberg JE (1980) Health screening for occupational dermatoses in housepainters. Contact Dermatitis 6:100–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson MLT, Roberts J (1978) Skin conditions and related need for medical care among persons 1–74 years. Vital Health Stat 11:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kanerva L, Toikkanen J, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1996) Statistical data on occupational contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 35:229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kavli G, Forde OH (1984) Hand dermaloses in Tromso. Contact Dermatitis 10:174–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lammintausta K, Kalimo K, Aanton S (1982) Course of hand dermatitis in hospital workers. Contact Dermatitis 8:327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lantinga H, Nater JP, Coenraads PJ (1984) Prevalence, incidence and course of ezema on the hands and forearms in a sample of thc general population. Contact Dermatitis 10:135–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leino T, Tammilehto L, Hytonen M, Sala E, Paakkulainen H, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational skin and respiratory diseases among hairdressers. Scand J Work Environ Health 24:398–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Livesley EJ, Rushton L, English JS, Williams HC (2002) The prevalence of occupational dermatitis in the UK printing industry. Occup Environ Med 59:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCurdy SA, Wiggins P, Schenker MB, Munn S et al (1989) Assessing dermatitis in epidemiologic studies: occupational skin disease among California grape and tomato harvesters. Am J Industr Med 16:147–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meding B, Jarvholm B (2002) Hand eczema in Swedish adults — changes in prevalence between 1983 and 1996. J Invest Dermatol 118:719–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meding BE, Swanbeck G (1987) Prevalence of hand eczema in an industrial city. Br J Dermatol 16:627–634

    Google Scholar 

  34. Menné T, Bogan O, Green A (1982) Nickel allergy and hand dermatitis in a stratified sample of the Danish female population: an epidemiological study including a statistic appendix. Acta Derm Venereol 62:35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Menné T, Christoffersen J, Maibach HI (1987) Epidemiology of allergic contact sensitization. Monogr Allergy 21:132–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer JD, Chen Y, Holt DL, Beck MH, Cherry NM (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis in the UK: a surveillance report from EPIDERM and OPRA. Occup Med 50:265–273

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE (2001) Prevalence of atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and hand and contact dermatitis in adolescents. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 144:523–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE (2002) Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 82:352–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nielsen NH, Linneberg A, Menné T, Madsen F, Frolund L, Dirksen A, Jorgensen T (2001) Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population: two cross-sectional surveys eight years apart (the Copenhagen Allergy Study). Acta Derm Venereol 81:31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nielsen NH, Linneberg A, Menné T, Madsen F, Frolund L, Dirksen A, Jorgensen T (2002) Incidence of allergic contact sensitization in Danish adults between 1990 and 1998; the Copenhagen Allergy Study, Denmark. Br J Dermatol 147:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nilsson GE, Mikaelsson B, Andersson S (1985) Atopy, occupation and domestic work as risk factors for hand eczema in hospital workers. Contact Dermatitis 13:216–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Paulsen E, Sogaard J, Andersen KE (1997) Occupational dermatitis in Danish gardeners and greenhouse workers (I). Prevalence and possible risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 37:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rea JN, Newhouse ML, Halil T (1976) Skin diseases in Lambeth. A community study of prevalence and use of medical care. Br J Prev Soc Med 30:107–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rystedt I (1985) Hand eczema and long term prognosis in atopic dermatitis (thesis). Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl] 117:1–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schäfer T, Bohler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Filipiak B, Wichmann HE, Ring J (2001) Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 56:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sertoli A, Francalanci S, Acciai MC, Gola M (1999) Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984–1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali). Am J Contact Dermat 10:18–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shum KW, Meyer JD, Chen Y, Cherry N, Gawkrodger DJ (2003) Occupational contact dermatitis to nickel: experience of the British dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) surveillance schemes. Occup Environ Med 60:954–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Smit HA, Coenraads PJ, Lavrijsen APM, Nater JP (1992) Evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 26:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Smit HA, Burdorf A, Coenraads PJ (1993) The prevalence of hand dermatitis in different occupations. Int J Epidemiol 22:288–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Smit HA, van Rijssen A, Vandenbroucke J, Coenraads PJ (1994) Individual susceptibility and the incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of apprentice hairdressers and nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health 20:113–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Susitaival P, Husman L, Hollmen A, Horsmanheimo M (1995) Dermatoses determined in a population of farmers in a questionnaire-based clinical study including methodology validation. Scand J Work Environ Health 21:30–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Susitaival P, Kirk J, Schenker MB (2001) Self-reported hand dermatitis in California veterinarians. Am J Contact Dermat 12:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Susitaival P, Flyvholm MA, Meding B, Kanerva L, Lindberg M, Svensson A, Olafsson JH (2003) Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Dermatitis 49:70–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Svensson A, Lindberg M, Meding B, Sundberg K, Stenberg B (2002) Self-reported hand eczema: symptom-based reports do not increase the validity of diagnosis. Br J Dermatol 147:281–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tacke J, Schmidt A, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (1995) Occupational contact dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and cooks. A population based study. Contact Dermatitis 33:112–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Taylor JS (1988) Occupational disease statistics in perspective (editorial). Arch Dermatol 124:1557–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Thompson TR, Belsito DV (2002) Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 13:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ (1998) Prevalence and incidence of hand dermatitis in hairdressing apprentices: results of the POSH study. Prevention of occupational skin disease in hairdressers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Uter W, Schnuch A., Gefeller O (2004) European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 51(2) 47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Varigos GA, Dunt DR (1981) Occupational dermatitis. An epidemiological study in the rubber and cement industries. Contact Dermatitis 7:105–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Vermeulen R, Kromhout H, Bruynzeel DP, de Boer EM (2000) Ascertainment of hand dermatitis using a symptom-based questionnaire; applicability in an industrial population. Contact Dermatitis 42:202–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wallenhammar LM, Ortengren U, Andreasson H, Barregard L, Bjorkner B, Karlsson S, Wrangsjo K, Meding B (2000) Contact allergy and hand eczema in Swedish dentists. Contact Dermatitis 43:192–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menné T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE (2002) Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991–2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Schwindt DA, Maibach HI (2000) Cutaneous biometrics. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wahlberg JE (2001) Patch testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Leppoittevin J-P (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 435–468

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schnuch A, Aberer W, Agathos M, Brasch J, Frosch PJ, Fuchs T, Richter G (2001) Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 52:864–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansen JD, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Frosch PJ, Dreier B, White IR, Rastogi S, Lepoittevin JP, Menné T (1998) The repeated open application test: suggestions for ascale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 39:95–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee CH, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J (1997) Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 37:53–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geier J, Uter W, Pirker C, Frosch PJ (2003) Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Contact Dermatitis 48:99–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brasch J, Henseler T (1992) The reaction index: a parameter to assess the quality of patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 27:203–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (2003) The positivity ratio-another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of apatch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 48:280–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neumann NJ, Hölzle E, Lehmann P, Benedikter S, Tapernoux B, Plewig G (1994) Pattern analysis of photopatch test reactions. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 10:65–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brasch J, Geier J, Gefeller O (1996) Dynamic patterns of allergic patch test reactions to ten European standard allergens — an analysis of data recorded by the “Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)”. Contact Dermatitis 35:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Uter W, Mackiewicz M, Schnuch A, Geier J (2005) Interne Qualitätssicherung von Epikutantest-Daten des multizentrischen Projektes “Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken” (IVDK). Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 53:107–114

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Hausen BM (2001) Contact allergy to Disperse Blue 106 and Disperse Blue 124 in German and Austrian patients, 1995 to 1999. Contact Dermatitis 44:173–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uter W, Geier J, Hausen BM (2003) Contact allergy to Disperse Blue 106/124 mix in consecutive German, Austrian and Swiss patients. Contact Dermatitis 48:286–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lehmacher W, Aberer W, Agathos M, Arnold R, Fuchs T, Laubstein B, Lischka G, Pietrzyk P, Rakoski J, Richter G, Rueff F (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 37:200–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilkinson JD, Hambly EM, Wilkinson DS (1980) Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments. Acta Derm Venereol 60:245–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersen KE, Veien NK (1985) Biocide patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 12:99–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Uter W, Ludwig A, Balda BR, Schnuch A, Pfahlberg A, Schäfer T, Wichmann HE, Ring J (2004) The prevalence of contact allergy differed between population-based and clinic-based data. J Clin Epidemiol 57:627–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O (2004) Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 51:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A (2003) Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients — an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 49:236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than Pvalues: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 292:746–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gefeller O, Pfahlberg A, Geier J, Brasch J, Uter W (1999) The association between size of test chamber and patch test reaction: a statistical reanalysis. Contact Dermatitis 40:14–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnuch A, Uter W (2003) Decrease in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions. Contact Dermatitis 49:107–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benezra C, Maibach H (1984) True cross-sensitization, false cross-sensitization and otherwise. Contact Dermatitis 11:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Brasch J (2002) Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der Epikutantestung — die Bewertung der Konkordanz bei synchroner Applikation. Allergologie 25:415–419

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W (2004) Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 50:65–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Becker D, Fuchs T, Richter G (2002) Die Epikutantestung mit “Parastoffen”. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 50:97–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Becker D, Fuchs T, Richter G (2002) The spectrum of allergic (cross-)sensitivity in clinical patch testing with “para amino” compounds. Allergy 57:319–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson WD, Walter SD (1988) A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 41:949–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Frosch P, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Goossens A, White IR, Uter W, Menné T, Johansen JD (2005) Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52:207–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schnuch A, Kelterer D, Bauer A, Schuster C, Aberer W, Mahler V, Katzer K, Rakoski J, Jappe U, Krautheim A, Bircher A, Koch P, Worm M, Löffler H, Hillen U, Frosch PJ, Uter W (2005) Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in Methyldibromo glutaronitrile sensitive-patients — results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 52:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Geier J, Gefeller O (1995) Sensitivity of patch tests with rubber mixes: results of the information network of departments of dermatology from 1990 to 1993. Am J Contact Derm 6:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dooms Goossens A, Naert C, Chrispeels MT, Degreef H (1980) Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate? Contact Dermatitis 6:232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP (2003) The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 149:986–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schnuch A (1996) PAFS: population-adjusted frequency of sensitization. (I). Influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis 34:377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott/Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghoj P, Andersen KE, Brandrup F, Kaaber K, Osmundsen PE, Thestrup Pedersen K, Veien NK (1989) Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis 21:291–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matthews DE, Farewell VT (1996) Using and understanding medical statistics. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM et al (1994) Multivariate analysis of the effect of selected factors on the elicitation of patch test response to 28 common environmental contactants in North America. Am J Contact Derm 5:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  43. Uter W, Geier J, Fuchs T (2000) Contact allergy to polidocanol, 1992 to 1999. J All Clin Immunol 106:1203–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O (2001) Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med 58:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dermatology Department, University Hospital, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Pieter-Jan Coenraads

  2. Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 58, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    Thomas Diepgen

  3. Univ. Erlangen Nürnberg, Waldstr. 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Wolfgang Uter & Olaf Gefeller

  4. Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken, Univ. Hautklinik, Von Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany

    Axel Schnuch

Authors
  1. Pieter-Jan Coenraads
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Diepgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Uter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Axel Schnuch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olaf Gefeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Hautklinik Lehrstuhl Dermatologie der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137, Dortmund, Germany

    Peter J. Frosch (Professor) (Professor)

  2. Dermatologisk afdeling K, Amtssygehuset Gentofte, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark

    Torkil Menné (Professor Dr.) (Professor Dr.)

  3. Laboratoire de Dermato-Chimie Clinique Dermatologique, CHU, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France

    Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin (Professor) (Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coenraads, PJ., Diepgen, T., Uter, W., Schnuch, A., Gefeller, O. (2006). Epidemiology. In: Frosch, P.J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31301-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation