Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology pp 95–111Cite as

Biological Safety of Diagnostic Sonography

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moore RM, Jeng LL, Kaczmarek RG, Placek PJ (1990) Use of diagnostic imaging procedures and fetal monitoring devices in the care of pregnant women. Public Health Rep 105:471–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML (2003) Births: Final Data for 2002; National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 52,No. 10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duck FA, Henderson J (1998) Acoustic output of modern ultrasound equipment: Is it increasing? In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G (eds) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson J, Willson K, Jago JR, Whittingham TA (1995) A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use. Ultrasound Med Biol 21: 699–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien WD Jr, Abbott JG, Stratmeyer ME, Harris GR, Schafer ME, Siddigi TA, Merritt CR, Duck FA, Bendick PJ (2002) Acoustic output upper limits proposition: should upper limits be retained? J Ultrasound Med 21:1327–1333

    Google Scholar 

  6. Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound; II. Criteria Based on All Known Mechanisms (2002) NCRP Report 140

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1997) Official Statement. Conclusions Regarding Heat

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett SB, Maulik D (2001) Guidelines and recommendations for safe use of Doppler ultrasound in perinatal applications. J Maternal Fetal Med 10:75–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (2003) EFSUMB Clinical Safety Statement. EFSUMB Newsletter 17:15

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (1998) WFUMB Symposium on safety of ultrasound in medicine: Conclusions and recommendations on thermal and non thermal mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 8:733–737

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1991) Safety considerations for diagnostic ultrasound. AIUM Publications, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1992) The standard for real-time display of thermal and mechanical acoustic output indices on diagnostic ultrasound equipment. AIUM/NEMA, Laurel, MD

    Google Scholar 

  13. FDA (1993) Revised 510(k) diagnostic ultrasound guidance for 1993. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine/National Electrical Manufacturers Association (1998) Standard for real-time display of thermal and mechanical acoustic output indices on diagnostic ultrasound equipment, Revision 1. AIUM Publications, Laurel, MD

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nyborg WL (1981) Heat generation in a relaxing medium. J Acoust Soc Am 70:310–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duck FA (1990) Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1992) Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: 1. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms. NCRP, Bethesda, MD, Report no. 113

    Google Scholar 

  18. Villar J (2000) Heat shock protein gene expression and survival in critical illness. Crit Care 4:2–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewey WC (1994) Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic. Int J Hyperthermia 10:457–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Duck FA (2003) Working towards the boundaries of safety. EFSUMB Newsletter 16:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw A, Pay NM, Preston RC (1998) Assessment of the likely thermal index values for pulsed Doppler ultrasonic equipment Stages 2 & 3: Experimental assessment of scanner/transducer combinations. NPL Report CMAM 12 National Physical Laboratory, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lele PP (1979) Review: safety and potential hazards of in the current applications of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Med Biol 5:307–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller MW, Ziskin MC (1989) Biological consequences of hyperthermia. Ultrasound Med Biol 15:707–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tarantal AF, Chu F, O’Brien WD Jr, Hendrick AG (1993) Sonographic heat generation in vivo in the gravid long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis). J Ultrasound Med 12:285–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Drewniak JL, Carnes KI, Dunn F (1989) In vitro ultrasonic heating of fetal bone. J Acoust Soc Am 86:1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bosward KL, Barnett SB, Wood AK, Edwards MJ, Kossoff G (1993) Heating of guinea-pig fetal brain during exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 19:415–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnett SB (2001) Intracranial temperature elevation from diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:883–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone PR, Ross I, Pringle K, Flower J (1992) Tissue heating effect of pulsed Doppler ultrasound in the live fetal lamb brain. J Fetal Diagn Ther 7:26–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mariak Z, Krejza J, Swiercz M, Lyson T, Lewko J (2001) Human brain temperature in vivo: lack of heating during color transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Neuroimaging 11:308–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morishima HO, Yeh M, Niemann WH, James LS (1977) Temperature gradient between mother and fetus as an index for assessing intrauterine fetal condition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129:443–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beard RW, Wood C (1964) Temperature of the human foetus. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 71:768–769

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Macaulay JH, Randall NR, Bond K, Steer PJ (1992) Continuous monitoring of fetal temperature by noninvasive probe and its relationship to maternal temperature, fetal heart rate, and cord arterial oxygen and pH. Obstet Gynecol 79:469–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Macaulay JH, Bond K, Steer PJ (1992) Epidural analgesia in labor and fetal hyperthermia. Obstet Gynecol 80:665–669

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Flynn HG (1964) Physics of acoustic cavitation in liquids. In: Mason WP (ed) Physical acoustics. Section 1B. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, p 57

    Google Scholar 

  35. Coakley WT, Nyborg WL (1978) Dynamics of gas bubbles, applications. In: Fry FJ (ed) Ultrasound: its applications in medicine and biology, Part 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nyborg WL (1979) Physical mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. In: Repachililo MH, Benwell DA (eds) Ultrasound short course transactions. Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare, Canada, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  37. Carstensen EL, Duck FA, Meltzer RS, Schwarz KQ, Keller B (1992) Bioeffects in echocardiography. Echocardiography 6:605–623

    Google Scholar 

  38. Suslick KS (1990) Sonochemistry. Science 247:1439–1445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nyborg WL (1978) Physical principles of ultrasound. In: Fry FJ (ed) Methods and phenomena 3, ultrasound: its applications in medicine and biology, part 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  40. Miller DL, Nyborg WL, Whitcomb DC (1979) Platelet aggregation induced by ultrasound under specialized conditions in vitro. Science 205:505–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill CR, Joshi GP (1970) The significance of cavitation in interpreting the biological effects of ultrasound. In: Proceedings of Conference on Ultrasonics in Biology and Medicine. Warsaw, UBIOMED-70, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  42. Carstensen EL, Flynn HG (1983) The potential of transient cavitation with microsecond pulses of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 9:L451–L455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Delius M, Enders G, Heine G et al (1987) Biological effects of shock waves: Lung hemorrhage by shock waves in dogs — pressure dependence. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:61–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Frizzell LA, Lee CS, Aschenbach PD et al (1983) Involvement of ultrasonically induced cavitation in the production of hind limb paralysis of the mouse neonate. J Acoustic Soc Am 74:1062–1065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee CS, Frizzell LA (1988) Exposure levels for ultrasonic cavitation in the mouse neonate. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:735–742

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Church CC, Miller MW (1983) On the kinetics and mechanics of ultrasonically induced cell lysis by non trapped bubbles in a rotating culture tube. Ultrasound Med Biol 9:385–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Topaz M, Motiei M, Gedanken A, Meyerstein D, Meyerstein N (2001) EPR analysis of radicals generated in ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty simulated environment. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:851–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Klibanov AM, Martinek K, Berezin IV (1974) The effect of ultrasound on A-chymotrypsin, a new approach to the study of conformational changes (transitions) in the active centres of enzymes. Biokhimiya 39:878–887

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Child SZ, Carstensen EL (1982) Effects of ultrasound on Drosophila — IV. Pulsed exposures of eggs. Ultrasound Med Biol 8:311–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Child SZ, Hartman CL, Schery LA, Carstensen EL (1990) Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:817–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Tarantal AF, Canfield DR (1994) Ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in the monkey. Ultrasound Med Biol 20:65–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Carstensen EL, Gracewski S, Dalecki D (2000) The search for cavitation in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 26:1377–1385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Frizzell LA, Zachary JF O’Brien WD Jr (2003) Effect of pulse polarity and energy on ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in adult rats. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2912–2918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dalecki D, Raeman CH, Child SZ, Carstensen EL (1997) Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frog heart: III. The radiation force mechanism. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:275–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. MacRobbie AG, Raeman CH, Child SZ, Dalecki D (1997) Thresholds for premature contractions in murine hearts exposed to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:761–765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fowlkes JB, Holland CK (2000) Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. J Ultrasound Med 19:69–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Meltzer RS, Adsumelli R, Risher WH, Hicks GL Jr, Stern DH, Shah PM, Wojtczak JA, Lustik SJ, Gayeski TE, Shapiro JR, Carstensen EL (1998) Lack of lung hemorrhage in humans after intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography with ultrasound exposure conditions similar to those causing lung hemorrhage in laboratory animals. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:57–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Miller DL, Thomas RM (1996) Contrast-agent gas bodies enhance hemolysis induced by lithotripter shock waves and high-intensity focused ultrasound in whole blood. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:1089–1095

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Miller DL, Dou C (2004) Membrane damage thresholds for pulsed or continuous ultrasound in phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol 30:405–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li P, Armstrong WF Miller DL (2004) Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 30:83–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. McIntosh IJC, Davey DA (1970) Chromosome aberrations induced by an ultrasonic fetal pulse detector. BMJ 4:92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Boyd E, Abdulla U, Donald I et al (1971) Chromosomal breakage and ultrasound. BMJ 2:501–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hill CR, Joshi GP, Revell SH (1972) A search for chromosome damage following exposure of Chinese hamster cells to high intensity pulsed ultrasound. Br J Radiol 45:333–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. McIntosh IJC, Brown RC, Coakley WT (1975) Ultrasound and ‘in-vitro’ chromosome aberrations. Br J Radiol 48:230–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Liebeskind D, Bases R, Mendez R et al (1979) Sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. Science 205:1273–1275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ehlinger CA, Katayama PK, Roester MR et al (1979) Diagnostic ultrasound increases sister chromatid exchange, preliminary report. Wisc Med J 80:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  67. Brulfert A, Ciaravino V, Miller MW et al (1981) Diagnostic insonation of extra-utero human placenta: No effect of lymphocytic sister chromatid exchange. Hum Genet 66:289–291

    Google Scholar 

  68. Miller MW (1985) Does ultrasound induce sister chromatid exchanges? Ultrasound Med Biol 11:561–570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Carstensen EL, Gates AH (1984) The effects of pulsed ultrasound on the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 3:145–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Manor SM, Serr DM, Tamari I et al (1972) The safety of ultrasound in fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 113:653–661

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lyon MF Simpson GM (1974) An investigation into the possible genetic hazards of ultrasound. Br J Radiol 47:712–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Pizszarello DJ, Vivino A, Maden B et al (1978) Effect of pulsed low-power ultrasound on growing tissues. Expl Cell Biol 46:179–191

    Google Scholar 

  73. Stolzenberg S, Torbit CA, Edmonds PD et al (1980) Effects of ultrasound on the mouse exposed at different stages of gestation: Acute studies. Radiat Environ Biophys 17:245–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cevito KA (1976) Early postpartum mortality following ultrasound radiation. Ultrasound Med 2:535

    Google Scholar 

  75. Fry FJ, Erdmann WA, Johnson LK et al (1978) Ultrasound toxicity study. Ultrasound Med Biol 3:351–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sikov MR, Hildebrand BP (1979) Effects of prenatal exposure to ultrasound. In: Persaud TVN (ed) Advances in the study of birth defects, vol 2. MIT Press, Lancaster, p 267

    Google Scholar 

  77. Shimizu T, Shoji R (1973) An experimental Safety Study of Mice Exposed to Low-Intensity Ultrasound. Excerpta Medica International Series No. 227. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  78. Shoji R, Murakami U (1974) Further studies on the effect of ultrasound on mouse and rat embryos. Teratology 10:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  79. Murai N, Hoshi K, Kang C et al (1975) Effects of diagnostic ultrasound irradiation during foetal stage on emotional and cognitive behavior in rats. Tohoku J Exp Med 117:225–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Kimmel C, Stratmeyer ME, Galloway WD et al (1983) An evaluation of the teratogenic potential of ultrasound exposure in pregnant ICR mice. Teratology 27:245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. McClain RM, Hoar RM, Saltzman MB (1972) Teratology study of rats exposed to ultrasound. J Obstet Gynecol 14:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  82. Warwick R, Pond JB, Woodward B et al (1970) Hazards of diagnostic ultrasonography — a study with mice. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrasonics Su-17:158

    Google Scholar 

  83. Edmonds PD (1979) Effects of ultrasound on biological structures. In: Hinselmann M, Anliker M, Mendt R (eds) Ultraschalldiagnostik in der Medizin. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  84. Brown N, Galloway WD, Henton WW (1981) Reflex development following in-utero exposure to ultrasound. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of American Institute of Ultrasound Medicine and 10th Annual Meeting of the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, Bethesda, MD, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  85. Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH (1995) Is ultrasound unsound? A review of epidemiological studies of human exposure to ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. European Committee for Medical Ultrasound (1996) ECMUS Safety Committee Tutorial: Epidemiology of diagnostic ultrasound exposure during human pregnancy. EJU 4:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  87. Bernstein RL (1969) Safety studies with ultrasonic Doppler technique. Obstet Gynecol 34:707–709

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hellman LM, Duffus GM, Donald I et al (1970) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics. Lancet 1:1133–1134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Falus M, Koranyi G, Sobel M, Pests E, van Bao T (1972) Follow-up studies on infants examined by ultrasound during the fetal age. Orv Hetil 13:2119–2121

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ziskin MC (1972) Survey of patient exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. In: Reid JM, Sikov MR (eds) Interaction of ultrasound and biological tissues. DHEW (FDA) 78-8008. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  91. Scheidt PC, Stanley F, Bryla DA (1978) One year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131:743–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Environmental Health Directorate (1981) Safety Code 23: Guidelines for the safe use of Ultrasound. Part I. Medical and paramedical applications, Report 8-EHD59. Ottawa Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  93. Bakketeig L, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G et al (1984) Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 2:207–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Eik-Nes S, Okland O, Aure JC, Ulstein M (1984) Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2:1347

    Google Scholar 

  95. David H, Weaver JB, Pearson JF (1975) Doppler ultrasound and fetal activity. BMJ 2:62–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Hertz RH, Timor-Tritsch I, Dierker LJ Jr et al (1979) Continuous ultrasound and fetal movement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135:152–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Powell-Phillips WD, Towell ME (1979) Doppler ultrasound and subjective assessment of fetal activity. BMJ 2:101–102

    Google Scholar 

  98. Murrills AJ, Barrington P, Harris PD, Wheeler T (1983) Influence of Doppler ultrasound on fetal activity. BMJ (Clip Res Ed) 286:1009–1012

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Stark CR, Orleans M, Haverkamp AD et al (1984) Short and long term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in-utero. Obstet Gynecol 63:194–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M, Cheang M (1988) In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6 year follow up. Radiology 166: 687–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Moore RM Jr, Diamond EL, Cavaliers RL (1988) The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol 71:513–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S et al (1988) Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2:585–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA et al (1993) Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 342:887–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Ewigman B, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD et al (1993) Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 329:821–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Salvesen KA, Jacobsen G, Vatten LJ et al (1993) Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent growth during childhood. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:6–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Grisso JA, Strom BL, Cosmatos I et al (1994) Diagnostic ultrasound in pregnancy and low birthweight. Am J Perinatol 11:297–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Macdonald W, Newnham J, Gurrin L, Evans S (1996) Effect of frequent prenatal ultrasound on birthweight: follow up at 1 year of age. Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Working Group. Lancet 348:482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Neilson JP (2004) Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kinnier-Wilson LM, Waterhouse J (1984) Obstetric ultrasound and childhood malignancies. Lancet 2:997–999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Sorahan T, Lancashire R, Stewart A, Peck I (1995) Pregnancy ultrasound and childhood cancer: a second report from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102: 831–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Cartwright R, McKinney PA, Hopton PA et al (1984) Ultrasound examination in pregnancy and childhood cancer. Lancet 2:999–1000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Shu X, Jin F, Linet MS et al (1994) Diagnostic x-ray and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 531–536

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnattingius S et al (2000) Prenatal ultrasound examinations and risk of childhood leukaemia: case-control study. BMJ 320:282–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Salvesen KA, Bakketeig LS, Eik-nes SH et al (1992) Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8–9 years. Lancet 339:85–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Campbell JD, Elford RW, Brant RF (1993) Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. CMAJ 149:1435–1440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH (1994) Routine ultrasonography in utero and speech development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:101–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Kieler H, Ahlsten G, Haglund B et al (1998) Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children’s subsequent neurologic development. Obstet Gynecol 91:750–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Hugdahl K, Bakketeig LS (1993) Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ 307:159–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Kieler H, Axelsson O, Haglund B, Nilsson S, Salvesen KA (1998) Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children’s subsequent handedness. Early Hum Dev 50:233–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O (2001) Sinistrality — a side-effect of prenatal sonography: a comparative study of young men. Epidemiology 12:618–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. AIUM (1995) Conclusions Regarding Epidemiology

    Google Scholar 

  122. Haar GT (1997) Commentary: Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Br J Radiol 69:1083–1085

    Google Scholar 

  123. Suslick K (1989) The Chemical Effects of Ultrasound. Sci Am 260:80–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA

    Dev Maulik Md, PhD

Authors
  1. Dev Maulik Md, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, 159 First Street, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA

    Dev Maulik MD, Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maulik, D. (2005). Biological Safety of Diagnostic Sonography. In: Maulik, D. (eds) Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28903-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28903-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23088-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28903-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation