Skip to main content

Interspecific Competition among Natural Enemies and Single Versus Multiple Introductions in Biological Control

  • Chapter
Trophic and Guild in Biological Interactions Control

Part of the book series: Progress in Biological Control ((PIBC,volume 3))

Abstract

One of the most challenging questions in biological control has been whether the single best natural enemy will provide greater suppression of the abundance of an arthropod pest than a combination of natural enemies due to the effects of competition for a shared resource (the pest). From a theoretical perspective, simple predator-prey models clearly indicate that for multiple natural enemies sharing a single pest, only a single natural enemy will persist in the system, the species that can reduce the pest to the lowest equilibrium density. In addition, the biological control record of natural enemy introductions against invasive insect pests suggests that establishment rates are higher for projects with single versus multiple introductions, and that competitive exclusion can result from a sequence of parasitoid introductions against a pest. From natural field populations, however, it is clear that insect herbivores frequently support a diverse assemblage of both parasitoid and predator species suggesting that resource partitioning can mediate the effects of competition. So how important are competitive interactions in the context of biological control? Here, I consider the asymmetries of competition among natural enemies of arthropod pests, the incidence of competitive exclusion, the mechanisms of coexistence and their consequences for the success of biological control, and the need for a more experimental approach to the study of competition among natural enemies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, P., 1987, The nonlinearity of competitive effects in models of competition for essential resources, Theor. Popul. Biol. 32: 50-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alyokhin, A., and Sewell, G., 2004, Changes in a lady beetle community following the establishment of three alien species, Biol. Invasions 6: 463-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare, P., 2000, Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: Local vs. spatial mechanisms, Ecology 81: 1286-1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare, P., 2002, Interference competition and species coexistence, Proc. R. Roc. Lond. B 269: 2541-2550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare, P., 2003, Diversity-stability relationships in multitrophic systems: an empirical exploration, J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 713-724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aukema, B. H., Richards, G. B., Krauth, S. J., and Raffa, K. F., 2004, Species assemblage arriving at and emerging from trees colonized by Ips pini in the Great Lakes region: Partitioning by time since colonization, season, and host species, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 117-129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., Gilpin, M. E., and Ehrenfeld, J. G., 1973, Competition between species, theoretical models and experimental tests, Theor. Popul. Biol. 4: 331-356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barradas, I., and Cohen, J. E., 1995, Disturbances allow coexistence of competing species, J. Math. Biol. 32: 663-676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, T. P., Hardy, I. C. W., Barrera, J. F., and Perez-Lachaud, G., 2005, Insect gladiators II: Competitive interactions within and between bethylid parasitoid species of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Biol. Control 33: 194-202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, F. D., 1993, Do introduced parasitoids displace native ones?, Fla. Entomol. 76: 54-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess, H. A., van den Bosch, R., and Haramoto, F. H., 1961, Fruit fly parasites and their activities in Hawaii, Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 17: 367-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biever, K. D., 1992, Distribution and occurrence of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) a parasite of Artogeia rapae in Washington and Oregon, J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 739-742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bográn, C. E., Heinz, K. M., and Ciomperlik, M. A., 2002, Interspecific competition among insect parasitoids: Field experiments with whiteflies as hosts in cotton, Ecology 83: 653-668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, G., and van Baaren, J., 2000, The role of larval aggression and mobility in the transition between solitary and gregarious development in parasitoid wasps, Ecol. Lett. 3: 469-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, M. B., and Hassell, M. P., 1999, Parasitoid-mediated effects: Apparent competition and the persistence of host-parasitoid assemblages, Res. Popul. Ecol. 41: 59-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, M. B., Hassell, M. P., and Asefa, G., 2002, Ecological trade-offs, resource partitioning, and coexistence in a host-parasitoid assemblage, Ecology 83: 925-934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, M. B., Hassell, M. P., Reader, P. M., and Jones, T. H., 2004, Coexistence of natural enemies in a multitrophic host-parasitoid system, Ecol. Entomol. 29: 639-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer, E. T., Murdoch, W. W., and Swarbrick, S. L., 2004, Parasitoid coexistence: Linking spatial field patterns with mechanism, Ecology 85: 667-678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C. J., and Latto, J., 2001, Interactions between the egg and larval parasitoids of a gall-forming midge and their impact on the host, Ecol. Entomol. 26: 109-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C. J., Nisbet, R. M., and Murdoch, W. W., 1993, Coexistence of competing parasitoid species on a host with a variable life cycle, Theor. Popul. Biol. 44: 341-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, J., and Rosenheim, J. A., 2000, Intraguild interactions in aphid parasitoids, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97: 93-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, W. M., 1993, Host-parasitoid-pathogen interactions, in: Parasites and Pathogens of Insects, Volume 2, N. E. Beckage, S. N. Thompson, and B. A. Federici, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 231-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W., and Miller, S. S., 1998, Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in apple orchards of eastern West Virginia and the impact of invasion by Harmonia axyridis, Entomol. News 109: 143-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W., and Schmitt, J. J., 2001, Seasonal and diurnal dynamics of beneficial insect populations in apple orchards under different management intensity, Environ. Entomol. 30: 415-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaneton, E. J., and Bonsall, M. B., 2000, Enemy-mediated apparent competition: Empirical patterns and the evidence, Oikos 88: 380-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, G. C., 1996, Comparison of single versus multiple species of generalist predators for biological control, Environ. Entomol. 25: 207-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. M., Abrams, P. A., Grover, J. P., Diehl, S., Chesson, P., Holt, R. D., Richards, S. A., Nisbet, R. M., and Case, T. J., 2002, The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis, Ecol. Lett. 5: 294-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choate, B. A., and Rieske, L. K., 2005, Life history and age-specific mortality of eastern tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera : Lasiocampidae), Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98: 496-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comins, H. N., and Hassell, M. P., 1996, Persistence of multispecies host-parasitoid interactions in spatially distributed models with local dispersal, J. Theor. Biol. 183: 19-28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387: 253-260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. H., Prokrym, D. R., Ellis, D. R., and Chianese, R. J., 1994, The known distribution of the predator Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States, and thoughts on the origin of the species of five other exotic lady beetles in eastern North America, Entomol. News 105: 244-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vis, R. M. J., Mendez, H., and van Lenteren, J. C., 2003, Comparison of foraging behavior, interspecific host discrimination, and competition of Encarsia formosa and Amitus fuscipennis, J. Insect Behav. 16: 117-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBach, P., and Sundby, R. A., 1963, Competitive displacement between ecological homologues, Hilgardia 34: 105-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denoth, M., Frid, L., and Myers, J. H., 2002, Multiple agents in biological control: improving the odds?, Biol. Control 24: 20-30..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Down, R. E., Smethurst, F., Bell, H. A., and Edwards, J. P., 2005, Interactions between the solitary endoparasitoid, Meteorus gyrator (Hymenoptera : Braconidae) and its host, Lacanobia oleracea((Lepidoptera : Noctuidae), infected with the entomopathogenic microsporidium, Vairimorpha necatrix (Microspora : Microsporidia), Bull. Entomol. Res., 95: 133-144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L. E., and Hall, R. W., 1982, Evidence of competitive exclusion of introduced natural enemies in biological control, Environ. Entomol. 11: 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, N., Kieckhefer, R., and Kauffman, W., 1996, Effects of an invading coccinellid on native coccinellids in an agricultural landscape, Oecologia 105: 537-544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. W., 2000, Morphology of invasion: body size patterns associated with the establishment of Coccinella septempunctata in western North America, Eur. J. Entomol. 97: 469-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. W., 2004, Habitat displacement of North American ladybirds by an introduced species, Ecology 85: 637-647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. C., 1971, Aspects of the physiology of endoparasitic Hymenoptera, Biol. Rev. 46: 243-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, S. E., 1971, Multiple parasitism of armored coccids (Homoptera) by host regulative aphelinids (Hymenoptera): ectoparasites vs endoparasites, Can. Entomol. 103: 857-872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, R. V., and Oatman, E. R., 1987, Competitive interactions endophagous parasitoids of potato tuberworm larvae in southern California, Hilgardia 55: 2-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Force, D. C., 1970, Competition among four hymenopterous parasites of an endemic insect host, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 63: 1675-1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Force, D. C., 1974, Ecology of insect host parasitoid communities, Science 184: 624-632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U., 1968, The comparative biologies of two hymenopterous parasites of the chaff scale, Parlatoria pergandii, Entomophaga 13: 163-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, W. M., and Mills, N. J., 1996, Host-parasitoid coexistence and egg-limited encounter rates, Am. Nat. 148: 333-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., 1994, Parasitoids: Behavioural and Evolutionary Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, D.J., and Greathead, A., 1992, Biological control of insect pests by insect parasitoids and predators: the BIOCAT database, Biocontrol News Inform. 13: 61N-68N.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, J. P., 1997, Resource Competition, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, J. P., and Holt, R. D., 1998, Disentangling resource and apparent competition: realistic models, J. Theor. Biol. 191: 353-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HÃ¥gvar, E. B., 1988, Multiparasitism of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae: competition in the egg stage between Aphidius matricariae and Ephedrus cerasicola, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 275-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, D. G., 1990, Displacement of Bathyplectes curculionis (Thoms.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) by Bathyplectes anurus (Thoms.) in eastern Ontario [Canada] populations of the alfalfa weevil, Hypera posticaGyll. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Can. Entomol. 122: 641-646

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P., Comins, H. N., and May, R. M., 1994, Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics, Nature 370: 290-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A., 1980, Disturbance, coexistence history, and competition for space, Theor. Popul. Biol. 18: 363-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B. A., and Lawton, J. H., 1987, Species richness for parasitoids of British phytophagous insects, Nature 326: 788-790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B. A., Cornell, H. V., and Hochberg, M. E., 1997, Predators, parasitoids, and pathogens as mortality agents in phytophagous insect populations, Ecology 78: 2145-2152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimpel, G. E., Neuhauser, C., and Hoogendoorn, M., 2003, Effects of parasitoid fecundity and host resistance on indirect interactions among hosts sharing a parasitoid, Ecol. Lett. 6: 556-566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, K. M., and Nelson, J. M., 1996, Interspecific interactions among natural enemies of Bemisia in an inundative biological control program, Biol. Control, 6: 384-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, A., and Heitland, W., 2005, Species diversity and niche separation of cocoon parasitoids in different forest types with endemic populations of their host, the common pine sawfly Diprion pini (Hymenoptera : Diprionidae), Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 217-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., 1991, Intra-host interactions between braconid endoparasitoid Apanteles glomeratusand a baculovirus for larvae of Pieris brassicae, J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 51-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., 1996, Consequences for host population levels of increasing natural enemy species richnesss in biological control, Am. Nat. 147: 307-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., and Hawkins, B. A., 1993, Predicting parasitoid species richness, Am. Nat. 142: 671-693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., and Hawkins, B. A., 1994, The implications of population dynamics theory to parasitoid diversity and biological control, in: Parasitoid Community Ecology, B. A. Hawkins, and W. Sheehan, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 451-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., and Lawton, J. H., 1990, Competition between kingdoms, Trends Ecol. Evolut. 5: 367-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M. E., Hassell, M. P., and May, R. M., 1990, The dynamics of host-parasitoid-pathogen interactions, Am. Nat. 135: 74-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D., 1977, Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities, Theor. Popul. Biol. 12: 197-229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D., and Lawton, J. H., 1993, Apparent competition and enemy-free space in insect host-parasitoid communities, Am. Nat. 142: 623-645.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D., and Lawton, J. H., 1994, The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 495-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D., Grover, H., and Tilman, D., 1994, Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition, Am. Nat. 144: 741-771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, F. G., 1991, Environmental impacts of classical biological control, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 485-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C. B., and Kennett, C. E., 1966, Studies of two parasites of olive scale, Parlatoria oleae(Colvée). IV. Biological control of Parlatoria oleae (Colvée) through the compensatory action of two introduced parasites, Hilgardia 37: 283-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. S., and Woolley, J. B., 2001, Evolution and behavioral ecology of heteronomous aphelinid parasitoids, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 251-290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. S., Collier, T. R., and Kelly, S. E., 2002, Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?, Ecology 83: 1459-1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, A. R., 1988, Aggregation and the coexistence of competitors, Ann. Zool. Fenn. 25: 75-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, A. R., and May, R. M., 1985, Competition within and between species in a patchy environment: relations between microscopic and macroscopic models, J. Theor. Biol. 115: 65-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakehashi, N., Suzuki, Y., and Iwasa, Y., 1984, Niche overlap of parasitoids in host-parasitoid systems: its consequence to single versus multiple introduction controversy in biological control, J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 115-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. J., Kim, K. C., and Roberts, D. W., 2005, Impact of the entomopathogenic fungus Verticillium lecanii on development of an aphid parasitoid, Aphidius colemani, J. Invert. Pathol. 88: 254-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberling, D. N., 2004, Lessons from history: predicting successes and risks of intentional introductions for arthropod biological control, Biol. Invasions 6: 301-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E. D., and Ives, A. R., 1997, Aggregation and the coexistence of competing parasitoid species, Theor. Popul. Biol. 52: 167-178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., and Chaplin, R., 2006, Insects as providers of ecosystem services, in: Insect Conservation Biology, A. Stewart, O. Lewis, and T. New, eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. E., and Corrigan, J. E., 1987, Intrinsic competition between the gregarious parasite Cotesia glomeratus and the solitary parasite Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidfae) for their host Artogeia rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), Entomophaga 32: 493-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., 1973, The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems, Ann. NY Acad Sci 231: 123-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzetti, F., Arnason, J. T., Philogene, B. J. R., and Hamilton, R. I., 1997, Evidence for spatial niche partitioning in predaceous Aphidophaga: Use of plant colour as a cue, Entomophaga 42: 49-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, E., 2005, Intraguild predation among aphidophagous predators, Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 351-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, E., and Alomar, O., 2002, Impact of the presence of Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae) on whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) predation by Macrolophus caliginosus(Wagner) (Heteroptera: Miridae), Biol. Control 25: 123-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck R. F., and Podoler, H., 1985, Competitive exclusion of Aphytis lingnanensis by Aphytis melinus: potential role of host size, Ecology 66: 904-913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, L. D., Ives, A. R., Waage, J. K., Hochberg, M. E., and Thomas, M. B., 2002, The risks of biocontrol: Transient impacts and minimum nontarget densities, Ecol. Appl. 12: 1872-1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., 1990, Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids, in: Critical Issues in Biological Control, M. Mackauer, L. E. Ehler, and J. Roland, eds., Intercept, Andover, pp. 41-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., and Kambhampati, S., 1986, Parasitoids of the pea aphid in North America, in: Ecology of Aphidophaga, I. Hodek, ed., Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 347-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marktl, R. C., Stauffer, C., and Schopf, A., 2002, Interspecific competition between the braconid endoparasitoids Glyptapanteles porthetriae and Glyptapanteles liparidis in Lymantria dispar larvae, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 105: 97-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, T., Itioka, T., Nishida, T., and Kaneko, S., 2003, Is one parasitoid enough? A test comparing one with a pair of parasitoid species in the biological control of arrowhead scales, Popul. Ecol. 45: 61-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M., and Hassell, M. P., 1981, The dynamics of multiparasitoid-host interactions, Am. Nat. 117: 234-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. C., 1980, Niche relationships among parasitic insects occurring in a temporary habitat, Ecology 61: 270-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 1990, Biological control, a century of pest management, Bull. Entomol. Res. 80: 359-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 1991, Searching strategies of the parasitoids of the ash bark beetle (Leperisinus varius F.) and its relevance to biological control, Ecol. Entomol. 16: 461-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 1994a, The structure and complexity of parasitoid communities in relation to biological control, in: Parasitoid Community Ecology, B. A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 397-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 1994b, Biological control: some emerging trends, in: Individuals, Populations and Patterns in Ecology, S. R. Leather, A. D. Watt, N. J. Mills, and K. F. A. Walters, Eds., Intercept, Andover, pp. 213-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 1999, Interspecific competition in insects, in: Ecological Entomology, Second Edition, C. B. Huffaker and A. P. Gutierrez, eds., Wiley, New York, pp. 355-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 2003, Parasitoid interactions and biological control, in: 1$st$ International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, R. Van Driesche, ed., USDA Forest Service FHTET-03-05, pp. 108-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J., 2006, Accounting for differential success in the biological control of homopteran and lepidopteran pests, N. Z. J. Ecol. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. J., Mueller, C. B., and Godfray, H. C. J., 2001, Field experiments testing for apparent competition between primary parasitoids mediated by secondary parasitoids, J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 301-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., Briggs, C. J., and Nisbet, R. M., 1996, Competitive displacement and biological control in parasitoids: A model, Am. Nat. 148: 807-826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., Briggs, C. J., and Nisbet, R. M., 2003, Consumer-Resource Dynamics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima, Y., and Akashi, M., 2005, Temporal and within-plant distribution of the parasitoid and predator complexes associated with Acyrthosiphon pisum and A. kondoi (Homoptera : Aphididae) on alfalfa in Japan, Appl. Entomol. Zool. 40: 137-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, S., and May, R. M., 1992, Dynamics of metapopulations, habitat destruction and competitive coexistence, J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 37-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netting, J. F., and Hunter, M. S., 2000, Ovicide in the whitefly parasitoid, Encarsia formosa, Anim. Behav. 60: 217-226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D. H., Nakai, M., Takatsuka, J., Okuno, S., Ishii, T., and Kunimi, Y., 2005, Interaction between a nucleopolyhedrovirus and the braconid parasitoid Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera : Braconidae) in the larvae of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Appl. Entomol. Zool. 40: 325-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obrycki, J. J., Giles, K. L., and Ormord, A. M., 1998, Interactions between an introduced and indigenous coccinellid species at different prey densities, Oecologia 117: 279-285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onzo, A., Hanna, R., and Sabelis, M. W., 2003, Interactions in an acarine predator guild: Impact on Typhlodromalus aripo abundance and biological control of cassava green mite in Benin, West Africa, Exp. Appl. Acarol. 31: 225-241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T. D., Paine, E. O., Hanks, L. M., and Millar, J. G., 2000, Resource partitioning among parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) of Phoracantha semipunctata in their native range, Biol. Control 19: 223-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedata, P. A., Giorgini, M., and Guerrieri, E., 2002, Interspecific host discrimination and within-host competition between Encarsia formosa and E. pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), two endoparasitoids of whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Bull. Entomol. Res. 92: 521-528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, B. S., and Mills, N. J., 2004, Single vs. multiple introduction in biological control: the roles of parasitoid efficiency, antagonism and niche overlap, J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 973-984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Lachaud, G., Hardy, I. C. W., and Lachaud, J-P., 2002, Insect gladiators: Competitive interactions between three species of bethylid wasps attacking the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Biol. Control 25: 231-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persad, A. B., and Hoy, M. A., 2003, Intra- and interspecific interactions between Lysiphlebus testaceipesand Lipolexis scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) reared on Toxoptera citricida(Homoptera: Aphididae), J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 564-569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pexton, J. J., and Mayhew, P. J., 2004, Competitive interactions between parasitoid larvae and the evolution of gregarious development, Oecologia 141: 179-190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phoofolo, M. W., Obrycki, J. J., and Lewis, L. C., 2001, Quantitative assessment of biotic mortality factors of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in field corn, J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 617-622.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plantard, O., Rasplus, J-Y., and Hochberg, M. E., 1996, Resource partitioning in the parasitoid assemblage of the oak galler Neuroterus quercusbaccarum L. (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), Acta Oecol. 17: 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pschorn-Walcher, H., 1987, Interspecific competition between the principal larval parasitoids of the pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer Geoff. (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae), Oecologia 73: 621-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, S. R., and Trumble, J. T., 2002, Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 435-465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, J., and Gutierrez, A. P., 2001, Weather-mediated regulation of olive scale by two parasitoids, J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 476-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., and DeBach, P., 1979, Species of Aphytis of the World (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), Israel University Press, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, J. A., 1998, Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 421-447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh, S. H., Shea, K., and Wilson, J. B., 2004, The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence, Ecology 85: 359-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, L., Fournet, S., Brunel, E., and Boivin, G., 1999, Intra- and interspecific host discrimination by host seeking larvae of coleopteran parasitoids, Oecologia 118: 59-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P., and Walzer, A., 2001, Combined versus single species release of predaceous mites: Predator-predator interactions and pest suppression, Biol. Control 20: 269-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellhorn, N. A., and Andow, D. A., 1999, Cannibalism and interspecific predation: Role of oviposition behavior, Ecol. Appl. 9: 418-428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellhorn, N. A., Kuhman, T. R., Olson, A. C., and Ives, A. R., 2002, Competition between native and introduced parasitoids of aphids: Nontarget effects and biological control, Ecology 83: 2745-2757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, R., and Schmid-Hempel, P., 1996, Larval development of two parasitic flies (Conopidae) in the common host Bombus pascuorum, Ecol. Entomol. 21: 63-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. F., and Dean, H. A., 1976, Competitive displacement of Anagyrus antoninae (Hym.: Encyrtidae), by its ecological homologue Neodusmetia sangwani (Hym.: Encyrtidae), Entomophaga 21: 127-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, K., Roxburgh, S. H., and Rauschert, E. S. J., 2004, Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes, Ecol. Lett. 7: 491-508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z.-H., Li, Q.-B., and Li, X., 2004, Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hym., Ichneumonidae) and Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) (Hym., Braconidae) in parasitizing Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidea), J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 437-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., Atkinson, W., and Charlesworth, P., 1979, Competition of a divided and ephemeral resource, J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 899-908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., Englund, G., and Wooster, D., 1998, Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey, Trends Evol. Ecol. 13: 350-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., 1929, Multiple parasitism: its relation to the biological control of insect pests, Bull. Entomol. Res. 20: 141-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, W.E., Chang, G. C., and Prasad, R. P., 2005, Conservation biological control: biodiversity influences the effectiveness of predators, in: Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions, P. Barbosa, and I. Castellanos, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 324-343

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk, D. A., and Collins, N. C., 1988, Synergistic interactions betweenfish and stone flies: facilitation and interference among stream predators, Oikos 52: 94-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, S., Podoler, H., and Rosen, D., 1987, Competition between two parasites of the Florida red scale in Israel, Ecol. Entomol. 12: 299-310

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M. R., 1986, The physiological interactions of parasitoids with their hosts and their influence on reproductive strategies, in: Insect Parasitoids, J. Waage, and D. Greathead, eds., Academic Press, London, pp. 97-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M. R., and Godfray, H. C. J., 1989, Superparasitism and ovicide in parasitic Hymenoptera theory and a case study of the ectoparasitoid Bracon hebetor, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 421-432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. J., and Völkl, W., 1999, Hyperparasitism: multitrophic ecology and behavior, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 291-315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szentkiralyi F., and Kozar, F., 1991, How many species are there in apple insect communities? Testing the resource diversity and intermediate disturbance hypotheses, Ecol. Entomol. 16: 491-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, M., and Hirose, Y., 1994, Building parasitoid communities: the complementary role of two introduced parasitoid species in a case of successful biological control, in: Parasitoid Community Ecology, B. A. Hawkins, and W. Sheehan, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 437-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasu, K., Hirose, Y., and Takagi, M., 1998, Occasional interspecific competition and within plant microhabitat preference in egg parasitoid of the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus (Hemiptera: Alydidae) in soybean, Appl. Entomol. Zool. 33: 391-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., 1982, Resource Competition and Community Structure, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., 1990, Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition, in: Perspectives on Plant Competition, J. B. Grace, and D. Tilman, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 117-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, E., 1984, The parasitoid complex (Hymenoptera Ichneumonoidea) of Toxoptera aurantii(Homoptera: Aphidoidea) in the Mediterranean area, Entomophaga 29: 203-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnock, W. J., Wise, I. L., and Matheson, F. O., 2002, Abundance of some native coccinellines (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) before and after the appearance of Coccinella septempunctata, Can. Entomol. 135: 391-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche, R. G., and Hoddle, M. S., 2003, Biological control of insect pests, in: Encyclopedia of Insects, V. H. Resh, and R. T. Cardé, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 103-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nouhuys, S., and Hanski, I., 2000, Apparent competition between parasitoids mediated by a shared hyperparasitoid, Ecol. Lett. 3: 82-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R. R., 1984, Interference competition and the coexistence of two competitors on a single limiting resource, Ecology 65: 1349-1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J., Evans, M. A., Foster, P., Höök, T., Reiskind, M., and Wund, M., 2002, Increased competition may promote species coexistence, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99: 8731-8736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B., and Hegazi, E. M., 1998, A possible mechanism for the physiological suppression of conspecific eggs and larvae following superparasitism by solitary endoparasitoids, J. Insect Physiol. 44: 703-712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., and Stadler. B., 1991, Inter-specific larval competition between Lysiphlebus testaceipes and Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), J. Appl. Entomol. 111: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, A., Blumel, S., and Schausberger, P., 2002, Population dynamics of interacting predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus, held on detached bean leaves, Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 731-743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. G., and Messing, R. H., 2002, Newly imported larval parasitoids pose minimal competitive risk to extant egg-larval parasitoid of tephritid fruit flies in Hawaii, Bull. Entomol. Res. 92: 423-429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. G., and Messing, R. H., 2004, Two different life-history strategies determine the competitive outcome between Dirhinus giffardii (Chalcididae) and Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Pteromalidae), ectoparasitoids of cyclorrhaphous Diptera, Bull. Entomol. Res. 94: 473-480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. G., Messing, R. H., and Bautista, R. C., 2003, Competitive superiority of early acting species: A case study of opiine fruit fly parasitoids, Biocontrol Sci. Techn. 13: 391-402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, H., Evans, E. W., Kajita, Y., Urakawa, K., and Takizawa, T., 2004, Asymmetric larval interactions between introduced and indigenous ladybirds in North America, Oecologia 141: 722-731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. S., Luck, R. F., and Murdoch, W. W., 1990, Competition, resource partitioning, and coexistence of an endoparasitoid Encarsia perniciosi and an ectoparasitoid Aphytis melinus of the California red scale, Ecol. Entomol. 15: 469-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaviezo, T., and Mills, N. J., 2001, The response of Hyssopus pallidus to hosts previously parasitized by Ascogaster quadridentata: heterospecific discrimination and host quality, Ecol. Entomol. 26: 91-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mills, N. (2006). Interspecific Competition among Natural Enemies and Single Versus Multiple Introductions in Biological Control. In: Brodeur, J., Boivin, G. (eds) Trophic and Guild in Biological Interactions Control. Progress in Biological Control, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4767-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics