Skip to main content

‘Copy and Paste’ or Scholarly Communication? Changing the Balance Point

  • Chapter
eLearning and Digital Publishing

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW,volume 33))

  • 910 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barton, M. R., & Walker, J. H. (2002). MIT Libraries’ DSpace business plan project. Final report to the Andrew W Mellon Foundation. Retrieved 21 February, 2005, from http://libraries.mit.edu/dspace-mit/mit/mellon.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. A., & Boyd, J. H. (1997). Capital theory, equilibrium analysis and recursive utility. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, K. (1999). Reflections on academic librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(5), 350–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, B. J. D., & Maid, B. M. (2004). Moving beyond definitions: Implementing information literacy across curriculum. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(2), 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E. (1994). Economics of crime: Deterrence and the rational offender. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2004). Anti-plagiarism strategies for research papers. Retrieved 21 February, 2005, from http://virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hind, R. (1974). A theory of evaluation applied to a university faculty. Sociology of Education, 47(1), 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, B. (2001). Libraries: Deliverers of lifelong learning. Adult Learning, 12(6), 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., Pegler, C., & Weller, M. (2004). EPortfolios: An assessment tool for online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 717–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, M., & Wu, Y. D. (2004). Building context-based library instruction. Journal of Education for Business, 79(6), 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamdasani, R. (2004, September 30). University tackling exam cheats head on: Chief. South China Morning Post, p. C3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. (2004). The usual doesn’t work: Why we need problem-based learning. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(4), 485–493.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2004). Academic original sin: Plagiarism, the Internet, and librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(3), 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 H. S. Ching, P. W. T. Poon and C. McNaught

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ching, H.S., Lau, L.C. (2006). ‘Copy and Paste’ or Scholarly Communication? Changing the Balance Point. In: Ching, H.S., Poon, P.W.T., McNaught, C. (eds) eLearning and Digital Publishing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3651-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3651-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3640-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3651-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics