Skip to main content

Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting — and Its Interaction with Ecoefficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators

  • Chapter
Implementing Environmental Management Accounting: Status and Challenges

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 18))

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of current trends, state of the art and best-practice in environmental cost accounting as well as a discussion of how it complements environmental performance and eco-efficiency indicators. It addresses a number of current approaches to ECA. Amongst others, these will refer to the evolution of and experiences with ECA in companies, such as activity-based costing, process costing and target costing. The trend in cost accounting towards relating costs to material flows and related environmental impacts calls for indicators of integrated economic and environmental performance measurement, so-called eco-efficiency performance measurement.

The complementarity of ECA with environmental performance indicators (in particular eco-efficiency indicators) and environmental performance measurement also needs to take into account the integration of ECA and performance measurement into controlling and operations. Therefore, the paper will also discuss how ECA and environmental performance indicators can be integrated into decision-making. The paper and performance measurement approaches for decision-making under different firm-level operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennett, M. and James, P. (1997), Environment-Related Performance Measurement: Current Practice and Trends. Ashridge: Ashridge Management College.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU and UBA (1996), Handbuch Umweltkostenrechnung. Berlin: Federal Environmental Agency (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjesson, S. (1997), A Case Study on Activity-Based Budgeting. Journal of Cost Management 10(4): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R.L. and Luckett, P.F. (1982), Direct Costing-Is It Allocation Free? Management International Review 4: 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • CICA (1997), Full Cost Accounting from an Environmental Perspective. Toronto/Canada: The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.M. (1923), The Incidence of Overhead Costs. Melbourne/Australia: University of Chicago Press/Accountants Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenenberg, A. (1993), Kostenrechnung und Kostenanalyse. Landsberg am Lech: Moderne Industrie (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditz, D., Ranganathan, J. and Banks, R. (1995), Green Ledgers. Case Studies in Corporate Environmental Accounting. Baltimore, World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, K., Loew, T. and Seidel, E. (1997), Betriebliche Umweltkostenrechnung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. and Blasius, R. (1995), Umweltkostenrechnung. In: BMU and UBA Handbuch Umweltcontrolling. München: Vahlen, pp. 439–457 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, E. and Paudke, H. (1977), Rechnungswesen. Kosten des Umweltschutzes. In: Vogl, J., Heigl, A. and Schäfer, K. (eds.) Handbuch des Umweltschutzes. Landsberg am Lech.: Moderne Industrie Grundwerk Teil M/III (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, E. and Kloock, J. (1989), Internes Rechnungswesen und Organisation aus der Sicht des Umweltschutzes. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis 41(2): 1–29 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidank, C. (1991), Kostenrechnung. Einführung in die begrifflichen, theoretischen, verfahrens-technischen sowie planungs-und kontrollorientierten Grundlagen des innerbetrieblichen Rechnungswesens München: Campus (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R.H. and Noreen, E.W. (2000), Managerial Accounting. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H. (1992), Umweltschutzkosten in der betrieblichen Vollkostenrechnung. Wirtschaftsstudium 3: 118–122 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D.R. and Mowen, M.M. (2000), Cost Management. Accounting and Control. Cincinnati OH: South Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. (1998), Environmental decision making, the Roles of Scientists, Engineers and the Public. Sydney/Australia: The Federation Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M., Shields, D. et al. (1995), Environmental Case Study: Amoco Yorktown Refinery. In: Ditz D., Ranganathan J. and Banks R. (eds.) Green ledgers. Baltimore: World Resources Institute, pp. 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, S. (2001), Umweltorientiertes Kostenmanagement durch Target Costing und Prozesskosten-rechnung in der Automobilindustrie. Lohmar (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C.T. and Foster, G. (2000), Cost Accounting. A Managerial Emphasis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, S. and Männel, W. (1993), Kostenrechnung — Moderne Verfahren und Systeme. Wiesbaden: Gabler (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAC (1998), Environmental Management in Organizations. The Role of Management Accounting New York: Financial and Management Accounting Committee of the International Federation of Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1999), Environmental management — Environmental performance evaluation — Guidelines (ISO 14031:1999). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization/International Standards Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • JEA (2000), Developing an Environmental Accounting System. Year 2000 Report. Tokyo/Japan: Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. and Kaplan, R. (1987a), Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. and Kaplan, R. (1987b), The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Management Accounting Information is Too Late, Too Aggregated, and Too Distorted to be Relevant. Management Accounting January: 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilger, W. (1992), Einführung in die Kostenrechnung. Wiesbaden, Gabler (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloock, J. (1990), Umweltkostenrechnung. In: Scheer, E. (ed.) Rechnungswesen und EDV. Heidelberg 129–156 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloock, J. (1993), Neuere Entwicklungen betrieblicher Umweltkostenrechnungen. In: Wagner, G.R. (ed.) Betriebswirtschaft und Umweltschutz. Stuttgart: Vahlen, pp. 179–206 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloock, J. (1995), Umweltkostenrechnung. In: Junkernheinrich, M., Klemmer, P. and Wagner, G.R. (eds.) Handbuch zur Umwelökonomie. Berlin: Springer, pp. 295–301 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiol, E. (1979), Kosten-und Leistungsrechnung. Grundlagen, Verfahren und Anwendungen. Berlin: Springer (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunert (1995), Modellprojekt Umweltkostenmanagement. Immenstadt/Augsburg: Kunert AG/IMU (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Letmathe, P. (1998), Betriebliche Umweltkostenrechnung. München: Vahlen (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann-Szyszka, J. (1994), Kostenrechnung und umweltorientiertes Controlling. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Einsatzes eines traditionellen Controllinginstruments im umweltorientierten Controlling. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, U. (1992), Umweltkostenrechnung. Grundlagen und Konzeption aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Sicht. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S. and Burritt R. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting — Issues. Concepts and Practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R. and Petersen, H. (2003), An Introduction to Corporate Environmental Management. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. and Müller, K. (1998), Calculating the True Profitability of Pollution Prevention. In: Bennett, M. and James, P. (eds.) The Green Bottom Line. Sheffield: Greenleaf, pp. 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Müller, K. and Hindrichsen, H. (1996), Corporate Environmental Accounting. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. and Sturm, A. (1994), Ökologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen. Ökologisches Rechnungswesen statt Ökobilanzierung. Notwendigkeit, Kriterien, Konzepte. Berne: Haupt (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, J. (1997), Environmental Regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Handler, T. (ed.) Regulating the European Environment (2nd ed.) Chichester & New York: John Wiley, pp. 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, M. (1988), Umweltmanagement in 22 Lektionen. Ein ökonomischer Weg in eine ökologische Wirtschaft. Wiesbaden: Gabler (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, E. and Herbst, S. (2001), Neuere Entwicklungen zum kostenorientierten Umweltmanagement. In: Kramer, M. and Brauweiler, J. (eds.) Umweltorientierte Unternehmensführung und ökologische Steuerreform. Wiesbaden: Gabler (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, T and Hähre, S. (1998), Stoffflußbasierte Umweltkostenrechnung zur Bewertung industrieller Kreislaufwirtschafskonzepte. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 2: pp. 147–174 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stölzle, W. (1990), Ansätze zur Erfassung von Umweltschutzkosten in der betriebswirtschaftlichen Kostenrechnung. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 4: 379–412 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • UstatG (1974), Gesetz über Umweltstatistiken vom 15.08.1974. Bonn: Bundesanzeiger (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI (1979), VDI-Richtlinie 3800. Kostenermittlung für Anlagen und Maßnahmen zur Emissionsminderung. Düsseldorf: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G.R. and Janzen, H. (1991), Ökologisches Controlling — Mehr als ein Schlagwort? Controlling 3(3): 120–129 (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmeyer, W. and Wagner, M. (2001), Environmental Performance indicators. In: Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Tyteca, D., Carlens, J., Olsthoorn, X., van Druinen, M., van der Woerd, F., Azzone, G., Noci, G., Jasch, C., Wehrmeyer, W., Wagner, M., Gameson T., Wolf, O., Eames, M. (eds.) Appendix II of MEPI — Measuring Environmental Performance of Industry, Final Report and Appendices submitted to European Commission (DG XII), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. and Becker, B. (1992), Total Cost Assessment. Catalyzing Corporate Self Interest in Pollution Prevention. New Solutions (Winter): 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicke, L. (1992), Betriebliche Umweltökonomie. Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. München,: Vahlen (available only in German).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M. (2005). Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting — and Its Interaction with Ecoefficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators. In: Rikhardsson, P.M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J.J., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Implementing Environmental Management Accounting: Status and Challenges. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3373-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics