Skip to main content

Lessons from the New Jersey Comparative Risk Project

  • Conference paper
Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making

Part of the book series: Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences ((NAIV,volume 38))

Abstract

Experience is a great teacher, and learning from someone else’s experience can make the lessons much less painful. This chapter shares lessons learned from the recently completed New Jersey Comparative Risk Project (NJCRP). It briefly describes the project and offers a preliminary evaluation of its adequacy, value, effectiveness, and legitimacy. The main purpose of this broadly scoped project was to inform a state regulatory agency’s strategic decisions. The project involved a large number of technical experts from a variety of fields, plus public officials, high-profile stakeholders, and members of the general public over a four-year period. It gathered and organized a vast amount of useful information, but found that there was still an inadequate scientific basis for a precise single ranking of environmental threats. The NJCRP instead developed policy findings using a humbler approach that involved less aggregation. Highlighted environmental threats for New Jersey included land use change, indoor environmental problems, a set of traditionally regulated pollutants, and invasive exotic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2003). New Jersey Comparative Risk Project Final Report. Available online at http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dsr/njcrp/index.htm.

  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Policy Analysis, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation (1987) Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems, Overview report and technical appendices, USEPA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, C.J. (2002) Humble Analysis: The Practice of Joint Fact-Finding, Praeger, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, K. (1997) “A Retrospective on Ten Years of Comparative Risk,” report prepared for the American Industrial Health Council by the Green Mountain Institute for Environmental Democracy (Montpelier, VT).

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Research Council, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterisation, H. Fineburg, ed. (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, W.C. and G. Majone (1985) The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications, Science, Technology, and Human Values 10 (3), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Centers for Disease Control., National Health Statistics Center online data, Trend C, Table 292: Deaths for 282 Selected Causes, By 5-year Age Groups, Race, and Sex, USA, 1979-1998, Lightning (E907), Pg. 1870. Downloaded on 13 January 2003 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/gm292_3.pdf. See also “Lightning-Associated Deaths: 1980–1995,” MMWR Weekly 47(19):391–394 dated 22 May 1998, available at www.cdc.gov.

  10. Mossman, B.T., J. Bignon, M. Com, A. Seaton, and J.B.L. Gee (1990) Asbestos: Scientific developments and implications for public policy, Science 247, 294, 299.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krimsky, S. and D. Golding, eds. (1992) Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weber, M. (1922/1957) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simon, H.A. (1976) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization, Harper & Rowe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, B.A., and A.R. Matheny (1995) Democracy, Dialogue, and Environmental Disputes: The Contested Languages of Social Regulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott, M. (1981) Pulling the Pieces Together: Amalgamation in Environmental Impact Assessment, EIA Review 2 (1) 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keeney, R., and H. Raiffa (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan, K.M. (1999) The Development and Evaluation of a Method for Risk Ranking, Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, available from UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews, C.J. (1992) Sorting out a consensus: Analysis in support of multi-party decisions, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 9 (2), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stirling, A. (2004) “Risk, uncertainty and precaution: Some instrumental implications from the socia sciences,” in F. Berkhout, M. Leach and I Scoones, eds., Negotiating Change, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andrews, C.J. (2004). Lessons from the New Jersey Comparative Risk Project. In: Linkov, I., Ramadan, A.B. (eds) Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics