Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant Conservation and Biodiversity: The Place of Microorganisms

  • Chapter
Microorganisms in Plant Conservation and Biodiversity

  • 655 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander M (1971) ‘Microbial ecology.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp D, Colwell RR, Hawksworth DL (1995) (eds) ‘Microbial diversity and ecosystem function.’ (CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews JH, Harris RF (2000) The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38, 145–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of the flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85, 532–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2000) ‘Gran Canaria declaration.’ (Botanic Gardens Conservation International: Kew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiuk S, Baca-Estrada M, Babiuk LA, Ewen C, Foldvari M (2000) Cutaneous vaccination: The skin as an immunologically active tissue and the challenge of antigen delivery. Journal of Controlled Release 66, 199–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barns SM, Delwiche CF, Palmer JD. Pace NR (1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity, thermophily and monophyly from environmental rRNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 93, 9188–9193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman RM, Crane PR, DiMichele WA, Kenrick PR, Rowe NP, Speck T, Stein WE (1998) Early evolution of land plants: phylogeny, physiology, and ecology of the primary terrestrial radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty AL, Brundrett MC, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2002) Orchid conservation and mycorrhizal associations. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 195–226. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J (1998) Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology 10, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasier CM (2001) Rapid evolution of introduced plant pathogens via interspecific hybridization. Bioscience 51, 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett MC (2002) Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytologist 154, 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett MC, Abbott LK (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant communities. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 151–193. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett MC, Cairney J (2002) Ectomycorrhizas in plant communities. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 105–150. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan RT (1999) Alien species and emerging infectious diseases: past lessons and future implications. In ‘Invasive species and biodiversity management. Norway/United Nations (UN) Conference on Alien Species, 2nd Trondheim Conference on Biodiversity, Trondheim, Norway, 1–5 July 1996.’ (Eds OT Sandlund, PJ Schei and A Viken) pp. 163–175. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bun E, Tan, B (2002) Microbial contaminants in plant tissue culture. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 307–335. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge AA (1994) Conservation biology in Australia: where should it be heading, will it be applied? In ‘Conservation biology in Australia and Oceania. (Eds C Moritz and J Kikkawa) pp. 27–37. (Surrey Beatty & Sons: Chipping Norton)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess T, Wingfield MJ (2002) Impact of fungal pathogens in natural forest ecosystems: a focus on Eucalypts. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 285–306. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderon FJ, Jackson LE, Scow KM, Rolston DE (2000) Microbial responses to simulated tillage in cultivated and uncultivated soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1547–1559.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon PF (1997) Strategies for rapid assessment of fungal diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 669–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler DP, Brockman FJ, Bailey TJ, Fredrickson JK (1998) Phylogenetic diversity of archaea and bacteria in a deep subsurface paleosol. Microbial Ecology 36, 37–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D (1997) Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277, 500–504.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney JWG (2000) Evolution of mycorrhiza systems. Naturwissenschaften 87, 467–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan FM (2001) Bacterial species and speciation. Systematic Biology 50, 513–524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collada AE, Haney A (1998) Vegetation changes associated with oak wilt in a Wisconsin sand savanna. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters 86, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RR, Clayton RA, Ortiz-Conde BA. Jacobs D, Russek-Cohen E (1995) The microbial species concept and biodiversity. In ‘Microbial diversity and ecosystem function.’ (Eds D Allsopp, RR Colwell and DL Hawks worth) pp. 3–15. (CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Arroyo MK, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 362–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig JL, Anderson S, Clout MN, Creese RG, Mitchell ND, Ogden J, Roberts M, Ussher GT (2000) Conservation issues in New Zealand. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell H, Guda C (1997) Biopolymer production in microorganisms and plants. Chemistry and Industry 14, 555–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer W, Kowalchuk GA (2001) Nitrification in acid soils: micro-organisms and mechanisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33, 853–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong EF, Pace NR (2001) Environmental diversity of bacteria and archaea. Systematic Biology 50, 470–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K, Read DJ (2002) Ericoid mycorrhizas in plant communities. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 227–240. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap PV (2001) Microbial diversity. In ‘Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Volume 4’ (Ed. SA Levin) pp. 191–205. (Academic Press: San Diego)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykhuizen DE (1998) Santa Rosalia revisited: why are there so many species of bacteria? Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73, 25–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton-Warburton LM, Allen EB, Allen MF (2002) Conservation of mycorrhizal fungal communities under elevated atmospheric CO 2 and anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 19–43. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertem M, Sarac A, Tumay S (2000) Poliomyelitis eradication programme: acute flaccid paralysis surveillance in Mardin and five other provinces around Mardin, Turkey 1998. Public Health 114, 286–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fein JB, Brady PV, Jain JC, Dorn RI, Lee J-U (1999) Bacterial effects on the mobilization of cations from a weathered Pb-contaminated andesite. Chemical Geology 158, 189–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel T (2001) Microorganisms (Microbes), role of. In ‘Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Volume 4’ (Ed. SA Levin) pp. 207–219. (Academic Press: San Diego)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliessbach, A. Mader, P. Dubois, D. Gunst, L (2000) Results from a 21 year old field trial. Organic farming enhances soil fertility and biodiversity. FiBL Dossier. Eidgenossische Forschungsanstalt fur Agrarokologie und Landbau, Zurich, Switzerland 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francki RIB, Fauquet CM, Knudson DL, Brown F (1991) Classification and nomenclature of viruses: fifth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses for the virology division of the international union of microbiological societies. Archives of Virology, Supplement 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gams W (2002) Ex situ conservation of microbial diversity. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 269–283. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeta Singh, Tilak KVBR (1998) Biological approach for secondary and micronutrients acquisition. Fertiliser News 43, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B, Wright S (2002) Bacterial associations with plants: beneficial, non N-fixing interactions. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 79–103. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts R (2001) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50, 1085–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray MW, Burger, G, Lang BF (1999) Mitochondrial evolution. Science 283, 1476–1481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grassle JF (2001) Marine ecosystems. In ‘Encyclopedia of biodiversity.’ Volume 4’ (Ed. SA Levin) pp. 13–25. (Academic Press: San Diego)

    Google Scholar 

  • Groudev SN, Spasova II, Ivanov IM (1996) Two-stage microbial leaching of a refactory gold-bearing pyrite ore. Minerals Engineering 9, 707–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran P, Raj KC (1999) Ethanol fermentation technology — Zymomonas mobilis. Current Science 77, 56–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldeman DL, Pitonzo BJ, Story SP, Amy PS (1994) Comparison of the microbiota recovered from surface and deep subsurface rock, water, and soil along an elevational gradient. Geomicrobiology Journal 12, 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PM (1992) Systematics and diversity: species inventory. In ‘Global biodiversity: status of the earth’s living resources.’ (Ed. B Groombridge) pp. 17–39. (Chapman & Hall: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EM, Goheen EM (2000) Phellinus weirii and other native root pathogens as determinants of forest structure and process in western north America. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38, 515–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy GEStJ, Sivasithamparam K (2002) Phytosanitary considerations in species recovery programs. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 337–367. (Kluwer Academic-Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1991) The fungal dimension of biodiversity: magnitude, significance and conservation. Mycological Research 95, 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1998) The consequences of plant extinctions for their dependent biotas: an overlooked aspect of conservation science. In ‘Rare, threatened and endangered floras of Asia and the Pacific Rim.’ (Eds C-I Peng, and PP Lowry II) pp. 1–16. (Academica Sinica: Taipei)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2001) The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycological Research 105, 1422–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horikoshi K, Grant WD (1998) (Eds) ‘Extremophiles: microbial life in extreme environments.’ (Wiley-Liss: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbes M (1999) The American elm and Dutch elm disease. Forestry Chronicle 75, 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton BJ, Sivasithamparam K, Dixon KW, Pate JS (1997) Effect of habitat disturbance on inoculum potential of ericoid endophytes of Western Australian heaths (Epacridaceae). New Phytologist 135, 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HyeongTae M (2000) Mass loss and changes of mineral nutrients during the decomposition of mushrooms, Russula alboareolala and Lactarius violascens. Korean Journal of Biological Sciences 4, 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram D (2002) Diversity and conservation of plant pathogens: bacteria and fungi sensu lato. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 241–267. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • James A, Gaston KJ, Balmford A (2001) Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? BioScience 51, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson J (2000) Going, going, gone. Plant species extinction in the 21st century. Environmental Science and Technology 1 March 2000: 130A–135A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2001) The distribution of soil nutrients with depth: global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry 53, 51–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein DA, McLendon T, Paschke MW, Redente EF (1996) Nitrogen availability and fungal-bacterial responses in successional semiarid steppe soils. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 10, 321–332.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs W, Brombacher C, Bosshard PP, Bachofen R, Brandl H (1997) Microbial recovery of metals from solids. FEMS Microbology Reviews 20, 605–617.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kull K, Zobel M (1991) High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. Journal of Vegetation Science 2, 711–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha CP, Rajani Srivastava, Singh, KP (2000) Implications of tillage and residue management on soil microbial biomass, N-mineralization rate and available-N in a dryland agroecosystem. Tropical Ecology 41, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Etter RJ, Rex MA, Gooday AJ, Smith CR, Pineda J, Stuart CT, Hessler RR, Pawson D (2001) Environmental influences on regional deep-sea species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 51–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun M, Visser S, Scheu S (1998) Oribatid mites enhance the recovery of the microbial community after a strong disturbance. Applied Soil Ecology 9, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) ‘Mineral nutrition of plants.’ (2nd edn) (Academic Press: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin W, Stoebe B, Goremykin V, Hansmann S, Hassegawa M, Kowallik KV (1998) Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 393, 162–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Lawton JH, Stork NE (1995) Assessing extinction rates. In ‘Extinction rates.’ (Eds JH Lawton and RM May) pp. 1–24. (Oxford University Press: Oxford)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald BA, Bellamy BK, Zhan Jia Sui. Appel DN (1998) The effect of an oak wilt epidemic on the genetic structure of a Texas live oak population. Canadian Journal of Botany 76, 1900–1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden G (1999) Chloroplasts: ever decreasing circles. Nature 400, 119–120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath SP, Dunham SJ. Atkin RK (1998) An extracting science. Chemistry and Industry 22, 915–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie EHC (2000) Fungi anamorphici in Australasia. Australian Systematic Botany 14, 485–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monreal CM, Bergstrom DW (2000) Soil enzymatic factors expressing the influence of land use, tillage system and texture on soil biochemical quality. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 80, 419–428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Nauta MM, Evans SE, Rotheioe M (2001) (eds) ‘Fungal conservation: issues and solutions.’(CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller B, Burgstaller W, Strasser H, Zanella A, Schinner F (1995) Leaching of zinc from an industrial filter dust with Penicillium, Pseudomonas and Corynebacterium: citric acid is the leaching agent rather than amino acids. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 14, 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8, 187–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Knoll AH (2001) The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5389–5392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nealson KH, Conrad PG (1999) Life: Past, present and future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 354, 1923–1939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pate JS (2002) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation between microorganisms and higher plants of natural ecosystems. In ‘Microorganisms in plant conservation and biodiversity.’ (Eds K Sivasithamparam, KW Dixon and RL Barrett) pp. 45–77. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson DJ (1999) The diversity of Eukaryotes. The American Naturalist 154, S96–S124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Ayres M, Balmford A, Branch G, Brandon K, Brooks, T, Bustamante R, Costanza R, Cowling RM, Curran LM, Dobson A, Farber S, de Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Kitching R, McNeely J, Lovejoy T, Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Patz JA, Raffle B, Rapport D, Raven P, Roberts C, Rodriguez JP, Rylands AB, Tucker C, Safina C, Melanie LJ, Supriatna J, Wall DH, Wicove D. (2001) Can we defy nature’s end? Science 293, 2207–2208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puri G, Ashman, MR (1998) Relationship between soil microbial biomass and gross N mineralisation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 251–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ristaino JB, Gumpertz ML (2000) New frontiers in the study of dispersal and spatial analysis of epidemics caused by species in the genus Phytophthora. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38, 541–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira AD (1972) Studies on the interactions between plant roots and microorganisms. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 38, 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sactre P, Brandtberg PO, Lundkvist H. Bengtsson J (1999) Soil organisms and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralisation in Norway spruce and mixed Norway spruce — birch stands. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28, 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen K, Faeth SH, Helander M, Sullivan TJ (1998) Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selosse M-A, LeTacon F (1998) The land flora: a phototroph-fungus partnership? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Buick R, Canfield DE (2001) Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era. Nature 410, 77–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siebrecht D (2000) Ulmensterben im Munsterland — die aktuelle situation. Forst und Holz 55, 747–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA (1984) Bacterial nomenclature. In ‘Bergy’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Volume 1.’ (Eds NR Kreig and JG Holt) pp. 19–23. (Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) ‘Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification.’ (W.H. Freeman: San Francisco)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stackcbrandt E (2001) Bacterial biodiversity. In ‘Encyclopedia of biodiversity, Volume 1.’ (Ed. SA Levin) pp. 325–337. (Academic Press: San Diego)

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Goksøyr J, Daae FL (1990) High diversity of DNA in soil bacteria. Applied Environmental Microbiology 56, 776–781.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Daae FL, Sandaa R-A, ØvreÃ¥s L (1998) Novel techniques for analysing microbial diversity in natural and perturbed environments. Journal of Biotechnology 64, 53–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren AM, Klop A, van der Koelen CJ, de Visser H (1999) Starch and stage of maturity of grass silage: site of digestion and intestinal nutrient supply in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 143–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson AA, Fleet GWJ, Asano N, Molyneux RJ, Nash RJ (2001) Polyhydroxylated alkaloids — natural occurrence and therapeutic applications. Phytochemistry 56, 265–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 6578–6583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, RT (1993) The ecological impact of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the Stirling Range National Park, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavarzin GA (1995) The microorganisms: a concept in need of clarification or one now to be rejected? In ‘Microbial diversity and ecosystem function.’ (Eds D Allsopp, RR Colwell and DL Hawksworth) pp. 17–26. (CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Isaac Centre for Nature Conservation, Lincoln University, P.O. 84, Canterbury, 8150, New Zealand

    David R. Given

  2. Kings Park & Botanic Garden, Botanic Gardens & Parks Authority, West Perth, 6005, Western Australia

    Kingsley W. Dixon & Russell L. Barrett

  3. Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia

    Kingsley W. Dixon

  4. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia

    K. Sivasithamparam

Authors
  1. David R. Given
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kingsley W. Dixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Russell L. Barrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Sivasithamparam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Western Australia, Perth

    K. Sivasithamparama  & K. W. Dixon  & 

  2. Kings Park & Botanic Garden, Western Australia

    K. W. Dixon  & R. L. Barrett  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Given, D.R., Dixon, K.W., Barrett, R.L., Sivasithamparam, K. (2002). Plant Conservation and Biodiversity: The Place of Microorganisms. In: Sivasithamparama, K., Dixon, K.W., Barrett, R.L. (eds) Microorganisms in Plant Conservation and Biodiversity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48099-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48099-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0780-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48099-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation