Conclusion
Two things are perhaps clear from this chapter. The first is that well-conducted international comparisons of student achievement in science and mathematics, and TIMSS in particular, are a rich source of data about science and mathematics education in many countries. There is much that is yet to learned from the outcomes of these studies, especially when they are examined in fine detail and considered alongside other relevant findings, e.g., those relating to school improvement and effectiveness. The second is that international differences in student achievement in science or mathematics are much less important than a detailed understanding of what lies behind them, i.e., how they can be explained. Establishing such explanations is difficult. It requires extreme sensitivity to the social, cultural and historical contingency of education systems and what goes on within them. It is equally necessary to avoid confusing correlation with causality but that there is much to be gleaned seems incontestable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkin, J. M. and Black, P. J. (1997) Policy Perils of International Comparisons: The TIMSS Case, Phi Delta Kappa, 70, 1, pp. 22–8
Bates I. (1995) The Competence Movement: Conceptualising Recent Research, Studies in Science Education, 25, pp. 39–68
Forgione, P. D. (1998) What We’ ve Learned From TIMSS About Science Education in the United State’, Address to the 1998 Conference of the National Science Teacher’ Association, http://nees.ed.gov/timss/report/97255-01.html
Griffith, J. E. and Medrich, E. A. (1992) What does the United States want to Icarn from International comparative studies in education? Prospects, 22, 4, pp. 476–85
Han, Jong-Ha. (1995) The Quest for National Standards in Science Education in Korea, Studies in Science Education, 26, pp. 59–71
Hans, N. Comparative Education A Study of Education Factors and Traditions, London
Harman, M., Smith T. A., Martin, M. O., Kelly, D. L., Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J. and Orpwood, G. (1997) Performance Assessment in the IEA’ Third International Mathematics and Science Study, (Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College)
Ilarris, S., Keys, W. and Fernandes, C. (1997) Third International Mathematics and Science Study Second National Report, Part 1 (Slough: NFER
Howson, G. (1999) The Value of Comparative Studies, in G. Kaiser, E. Luna and I. Huntly, op.cit, pp. 165–88
Hussein, M. G. (1992) What does Kuwait want to learn from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)? Prospects, 22, 4, pp. 463–8
Kaiser, G. (1990) Comparative Studies on Teaching Mathematics in England and Germany, in Kaiser, G., Luna, E. and Huntly, L. (eds.) op.cit, pp. 140–50
Kaiser, G., Luna, E. and Huntly. I. (eds.) International Comparisions in Mathematics Education (Falmer: London)
Kandel I. L. (1955) The New Era in Education A Comparative Study (London: Harrap)
Keitel, C. and Kilpatrick, J. (1990) Rationality and Irrationality of International Comparisons, in G. Kaiser, E. Luna and I. Huntly (eds.) International Comparisions in Mathematics Education pp. 241–56 (Falmer: London)
Keys, W., Harris, S. and Fernandes, C. (1990) Third International Mathematics and Science Study Part 1 (Slough: NFER)
Nebres, B. F. (1999) International Benchmarking as a Way to Improve School Mathematics Achievement in the Era of Globalisation’, in G. Kaiser, E. Luna and I. Huntly (eds.), op.cit, pp. 200–12
Nesbit, J. (1974) Fifty Years of Research in Scicncc Education, Studies in Science Education 1, pp. 103–12
Noah, H. J. and Eckstein, M. A. (1969) Towards a Science of Comparative Education (Toronto: MacmiIIan)
Reynolds, D. and Farrell, S. (1996) Worlds Apart? A Review of International Surveys of Educational Achievement involving England (London: HMSO)
Robitaille, D. F. (ed.) (1997) National Contexts for Mathematics and Science Education. An Encyclopaedia of the Education Systems Participating in TlMSS (Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press)
Schmidt. W. H. and McKnight, C. C. (1998) So What Can we Really Learn From TIMSS?, http://TIMSS.msu.edu.whatcanwelearn.htm
Shorrocks-Taylor, D., Jenkins, E., Curry, J., Swinnerton, B., Hargreaves, M. and Nelson, N. (1998) An Investigation of the Performance of English Pupils in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (Leeds: Assessment and Evaluation Unit/ Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds)
Sjøberg S. (1992) The IEA Science Study, SISS. Some Critical Points on Items and Questionnaires Paper prcsented at the Fifteenth Comparative Education Society in Europe Conference, Dijon, June 27th–July 2nd 1992
Stilger, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S. and Serrano, A. (1998) Methods and Findings of the TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office)
Watanabe, R. (1902) How Japan Makes Use of International Educational Survey research, Prospects, 22, pp. 456–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jenkins, E. (2000). Making Use of International Comparisons of Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics. In: Shorrocks-Taylor, D., Jenkins, E.W. (eds) Learning from Others. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47219-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47219-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6343-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47219-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive