Abstract
The movement of cells in response to a gradient in chemical concentration—known as chemotaxis—is crucial for the proper functioning of uni-and multicellular organisms. How a cell senses the chemical concentration gradient surrounding it, and what signal is transmitted to its motion apparatus is known as gradient sensing. The ability of a cell to sense gradients persists even when the cell is immobilized (i.e., its motion apparatus is deactivated). This suggests that important features of gradient sensing can be studied in isolation, decoupling this phenomenon from the movement of the cell. A mathematical model for gradient sensing in Dictyostelium cells and neutrophils was recently proposed. This consists of an adaptation/spatial sensing module. This spatial sensing module feeds into an amplification module, magnifying the effects of the former. In this paper, we analyze the spatial sensing module in detail and examine its signal transduction properties. We examine the response of this module to several inputs of experimental and biological relevance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alon, U., M. G. Surette, N. Barkai and S. Leibler (1999). Robustness chemotaxis. Nature 397, 168–171.
Barkai, N. and S. Leibler (1997). Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387, 913–917.
Byrnes, C. I. and A. Isidori (1990). Output regulation of nonlinear systems. Autom. Control 35, 131–140.
Csete, M. E. and J. C. Doyle (2002). Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 295, 1664–1669.
Dallon, J. C. and H. G. Othmer (1998). A continuum analysis of the chemotactic signal seen by Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Theor. Biol. 194, 461–483.
Devreotes, P. N. (2001). Personal communication.
Fisher, P. R. (1990). Pseudopodium activation and inhibition signals in chemotactics by Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae. Semin. Cell Biol. 1, 87–97.
Foxman, E. F., J. J. Campbell and E. C. Butcher (1997). Multistep navigation and the combinatorial control of leukocyte chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1349–1360.
Foxman, E. F., E. J. Kunkel and E. C. Butcher (1999). Integrating conflicting chemotactic signals: the role of memory in leukocyte navigation. J. Cell Biol. 147, 577–877.
Francis, B. A. and W. M. Wonham (1975). The internal model principle of control theory. Automatica 12, 457–465.
Goldbeter, A. and D. E. Koshland Jr (1981). An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78, 6840–6844.
Goldstein, R. E. (1996). Traveling wave chemotaxis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 775–778.
Hartwell, L. H., J. J. Hopfield, S. Leibler and A. W. Murray (1999). From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402, C47–C52.
Janetopoulos, C., T. Jin and P. N. Devreotes (2001). Receptor mediated heterotrimeric G-proteins in living cells. Science 291, 2408–2411.
Jin, T., N. Zhang, Y. Long, C. A. Parent and P. N. Devreotes (2000). Dynamic localization of the G-protein βγ complex in living cells during chemotaxis. Science 287, 1034–1036.
Lauzeral, J., J. Halloy and A. Goldbeter (1997). Desynchronization of developmental path triggers formation of spiral waves of cAMP during Dictyostelium aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 9153–9158.
Levchenko, A. and P. A. Iglesias (2002). Models of eukaryotic gradient application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys. J. 82, 50–63.
Meinhardt, H. (1999). Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 112, 2867–2874.
Narang, A., K. K. Subramanian and D. A Lauffenburger (2001). A mathematical model for chemoattractant gradient sensing based on receptor-regulated membrane phospholipid signaling dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29, 677–691.
Palsson, E. and E. C. Cox (1996). Origin and evolution of circular waves and spirals in Dictyostelium discoideum territories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 1151–1155.
Palsson, E., K. J. Lee, R. E. Goldstein, J. Franke, R. H. Kessin and E. C. Cox (1997). Selection for spiral waves in the social amoebae Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 13719–13723.
Parent, C. A. and P. N. Devreotes (1999). A cell’s sense of direction. Science 284, 765–770.
Postma, M. and P. J. M. Van Haastert (2001). A diffusion translocation model for gradient sensing by eukaryotic cells. Biophys. J. 81, 1314–1323.
Servant, G., O. D. Weiner, P. Herzmark, T. Balla, J. W. Sedat and H. R. Bourne (2000). Polarization of chemoattractor receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287, 1037–1040.
Yi, T.-M., Y. Huang, M. I. Simon and J. C. Doyle (2000). Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 4649–4653.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishnan, J., Iglesias, P.A. Analysis of the signal transduction properties of a module of spatial sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Bull. Math. Biol. 65, 95–128 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0323
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0323