Skip to main content
Log in

Cellular automaton models for competition in patchy environments: Facilitation, inhibition, and tolerance

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have developed cellular automaton models for two species competing in a patchy environment. We have modeled three common types of competition: facilitation (in which the winning species can colonize only after the losing species has arrived) inhibition (in which either species is able to prevent the other from colonizing) and tolerance (in which the species most tolerant of reduced resource levels wins). The state of a patch is defined by the presence or absence of each species. State transition probabilities are determined by rates of disturbance, competitive exclusion, and colonization. Colonization is restricted to neighboring patches. In all three models, disturbance permits regional persistence of species that are excluded by competition locally. Persistence, and hence diversity, is maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies. If disturbance and dispersal rates are sufficiently high, the inferior competitor need not have a dispersal advantage to persist. Using a new method for measuring the spatial patterns of nominal data, we show that none of these competition models generates patchiness at equilibrium. In the inhibition model, however, transient patchiness decays very slowly. We compare the cellular automaton models to the corresponding mean-field patch-occupancy models, in which colonization is not restricted to neighboring patches and depends on spatially averaged species frequencies. The patch-occupancy model does an excellent job of predicting the equilibrium frequencies of the species and the conditions required for coexistence, but not of predicting transient behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barradas, I. and J. E. Cohen (1994). Disturbances allow coexistence of competing species. J. Math. Biol. 32, 663–676.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barradas, I., H. Caswell and J. E. Cohen (1996). Competition during colonization vs competition after colonization in disturbed environments: a metapopulation approach. Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 1187–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. (1978). Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Am. Nat. 112, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1991a). Communities in patchy environments: a model of disturbance, competition, and heterogenity, in Ecological Heterogeneity, J. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett (Eds), New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1991b). Disturbance, interspecific interaction, and diversity in metapopulations. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42, 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1993). Local and regional regulation of species-area relations: a patch-occupancy model, in Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter (Eds), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1995). Red, white and blue: environmental variance spectra and coexistence in metapopulations. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. and R. J. Etter (1993). Ecological interactions in patchy environments: from patch-occupancy models to cellular automata, in Patch Dynamics, S. A. Levin, T. M. Powell and J. H. Steele (Eds), New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (1970). A Markov contingency-table model for replicated Lotka-Volterra systems near equilibrium. Am. Nat. 104, 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. and R. O. Slatyer (1977). Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaran, T. and S. Bartha (1993). Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrett, R. and S. A. Levin (1994a). Stochastic spatial models: a user’s guide to ecological applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B343, 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrett, R. and S. A. Levin (1994b). The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor. Pop. Biol. 46, 363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dytham, C. (1994). Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: a cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 490–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout, G. B. and L. Edelstein-Keshet (1993). Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. J. Theor. Biol. 160, 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. and I. Hanski (Eds.) (1991). Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. and W. H. Kruskal (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49, 732–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1983). Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64, 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. A. and M. E. Gilpin (1997). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A. (1978). Spatial heterogenity and the stability of predator-prey systems: predator-mediated coexistence. Theor. Pop. Biol. 14, 380–395.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebeler, D. (1997). Stochastic spatial models: from simulations to mean field and local structure approximations. J. Theor. Biol. 187, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. S. (1987). Cell-to-cell Mapping: a Method for Global Analysis for Nonlinear Systems, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, V. and K. Schmitt (1992). Permanence and the dynamics of biological systems. Math. Biosci. 111, 1–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. (1951). Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32, 571–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inghe, O. (1989). Genet and ramet survivorship under different mortality regimes—a cellular automata model. J. Theor. Biol. 138, 257–270

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y., K. Sato and S. Nakashima (1991). Dynamic modeling of wave regeneration (shimagare) in subalpine Abies forests. J. Theor. Biol. 152, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. (1990). Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B330, 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1970). Extinction, in Some Mathematical Problems in Biology, M. Gerstenhaber (Ed.), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebetrau, A. M. (1983). Measures of Association. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 32, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R. J. and B. H. Margolin (1971). An analysis of variance for categorical data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 534–544.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen, A. and I. Hanski (1995). Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, S. and R. M. May (1992). Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning, S. and A. J. Parsons (1996). A spatially explicit population model of stoloniferous N-fixing legumes in mixed pasture with grass. J. Ecol. 84, 815–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada, N. and K. Kawasaki (1997). Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. and P. Kareiva (1997). Spatial Ecology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (1998). Quantitative Analysis of Movement, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. G., A. de Roos and E. McCauley (1993). Spatial instabilities within the diffusive Lotka-Volterra system: individual-based simulation results. Theor. Pop. Biol. 43, 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hal Caswell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caswell, H., Etter, R. Cellular automaton models for competition in patchy environments: Facilitation, inhibition, and tolerance. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 625–649 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0090

Keywords

Navigation