Abstract
We have developed cellular automaton models for two species competing in a patchy environment. We have modeled three common types of competition: facilitation (in which the winning species can colonize only after the losing species has arrived) inhibition (in which either species is able to prevent the other from colonizing) and tolerance (in which the species most tolerant of reduced resource levels wins). The state of a patch is defined by the presence or absence of each species. State transition probabilities are determined by rates of disturbance, competitive exclusion, and colonization. Colonization is restricted to neighboring patches. In all three models, disturbance permits regional persistence of species that are excluded by competition locally. Persistence, and hence diversity, is maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies. If disturbance and dispersal rates are sufficiently high, the inferior competitor need not have a dispersal advantage to persist. Using a new method for measuring the spatial patterns of nominal data, we show that none of these competition models generates patchiness at equilibrium. In the inhibition model, however, transient patchiness decays very slowly. We compare the cellular automaton models to the corresponding mean-field patch-occupancy models, in which colonization is not restricted to neighboring patches and depends on spatially averaged species frequencies. The patch-occupancy model does an excellent job of predicting the equilibrium frequencies of the species and the conditions required for coexistence, but not of predicting transient behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barradas, I. and J. E. Cohen (1994). Disturbances allow coexistence of competing species. J. Math. Biol. 32, 663–676.
Barradas, I., H. Caswell and J. E. Cohen (1996). Competition during colonization vs competition after colonization in disturbed environments: a metapopulation approach. Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 1187–1207.
Caswell, H. (1978). Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Am. Nat. 112, 127–154.
Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1991a). Communities in patchy environments: a model of disturbance, competition, and heterogenity, in Ecological Heterogeneity, J. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett (Eds), New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 97–122.
Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1991b). Disturbance, interspecific interaction, and diversity in metapopulations. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42, 193–218.
Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1993). Local and regional regulation of species-area relations: a patch-occupancy model, in Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter (Eds), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 99–107.
Caswell, H. and J. E. Cohen (1995). Red, white and blue: environmental variance spectra and coexistence in metapopulations. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 301–316.
Caswell, H. and R. J. Etter (1993). Ecological interactions in patchy environments: from patch-occupancy models to cellular automata, in Patch Dynamics, S. A. Levin, T. M. Powell and J. H. Steele (Eds), New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 93–109.
Cohen, J. E. (1970). A Markov contingency-table model for replicated Lotka-Volterra systems near equilibrium. Am. Nat. 104, 547–560.
Connell, J. H. and R. O. Slatyer (1977). Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144.
Czaran, T. and S. Bartha (1993). Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 38–42.
Durrett, R. and S. A. Levin (1994a). Stochastic spatial models: a user’s guide to ecological applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B343, 329–350.
Durrett, R. and S. A. Levin (1994b). The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor. Pop. Biol. 46, 363–394
Dytham, C. (1994). Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: a cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 490–491.
Ermentrout, G. B. and L. Edelstein-Keshet (1993). Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. J. Theor. Biol. 160, 97–133.
Gilpin, M. and I. Hanski (Eds.) (1991). Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations, London: Academic Press.
Goodman, L. A. and W. H. Kruskal (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49, 732–764.
Hanski, I. (1983). Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64, 493–500.
Hanski, I. A. and M. E. Gilpin (1997). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hastings, A. (1978). Spatial heterogenity and the stability of predator-prey systems: predator-mediated coexistence. Theor. Pop. Biol. 14, 380–395.
Hiebeler, D. (1997). Stochastic spatial models: from simulations to mean field and local structure approximations. J. Theor. Biol. 187, 307–319.
Hsu, C. S. (1987). Cell-to-cell Mapping: a Method for Global Analysis for Nonlinear Systems, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hutson, V. and K. Schmitt (1992). Permanence and the dynamics of biological systems. Math. Biosci. 111, 1–71.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1951). Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32, 571–577.
Inghe, O. (1989). Genet and ramet survivorship under different mortality regimes—a cellular automata model. J. Theor. Biol. 138, 257–270
Iwasa, Y., K. Sato and S. Nakashima (1991). Dynamic modeling of wave regeneration (shimagare) in subalpine Abies forests. J. Theor. Biol. 152, 143–158.
Kareiva, P. (1990). Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B330, 175–190.
Levins, R. (1970). Extinction, in Some Mathematical Problems in Biology, M. Gerstenhaber (Ed.), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 75–107.
Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943–1967.
Liebetrau, A. M. (1983). Measures of Association. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 32, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Light, R. J. and B. H. Margolin (1971). An analysis of variance for categorical data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 534–544.
Moilanen, A. and I. Hanski (1995). Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 141–144.
Nee, S. and R. M. May (1992). Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40.
Schwinning, S. and A. J. Parsons (1996). A spatially explicit population model of stoloniferous N-fixing legumes in mixed pasture with grass. J. Ecol. 84, 815–826.
Shigesada, N. and K. Kawasaki (1997). Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tilman, D. and P. Kareiva (1997). Spatial Ecology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Turchin, P. (1998). Quantitative Analysis of Movement, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Wilson, W. G., A. de Roos and E. McCauley (1993). Spatial instabilities within the diffusive Lotka-Volterra system: individual-based simulation results. Theor. Pop. Biol. 43, 91–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caswell, H., Etter, R. Cellular automaton models for competition in patchy environments: Facilitation, inhibition, and tolerance. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 625–649 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0090
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0090