Skip to main content

Abstract

In the ten years since the first National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, the science and policy landscape for adaptation has evolved significantly. Adaptation is emerging as an essential strategy for managing climate risk and a broad range of adaptation initiatives are being pursued across a range of geopolitical scales. This interest in adaptation has emerged from an increased awareness that climate impacts are unavoidable (Wetherland et al., 2001); a growing availability of knowledge, data, and tools for the assessment of climate risk; and the interest of government agencies, businesses, and communities in increasing their resilience to both current climate variability as well as future climate change. However, adaptation strategies are not generally mainstreamed into the policy apparatus of governments or the development plans of the private sector; in other words, adaptation strategies supplement existing planning efforts but often involve an effort on their own rather than being integrated into existing management and policy regimes. Also, although adaptation planning has an increasingly rich portfolio of case studies contributing to shared learning (Gregg et al., 2011), the implementation of adaptation plans has proceeded at a much slower pace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Inclusion of a specific tool as an example does not necessarily indicate endorsement.

  2. 2.

    This working group was formed in 2011 by Conservation International (CI), the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the Intergovernmental Oceanic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO.

References

  • Adaptation Advisory Committee. (2011). Massachusetts climate change adaptation report. Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs and the Adaptation Advisory Committee, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo,V. & Cruce, T.L. (2012). State and Local Adaptation to Climate Change. In: The Law of Adaptation to Climate Change, Michael B. Gerrard & Katrina F. Kuh (Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beever, J., Gray, W., Trescott, D., Cobb, D., Utley, J., Hutchinson, D., Gibbons, J., Walker, T., Abimbola, M., Beever, L., and Ott, J. (2009, November 18). City of Punta Gorda Adaptation Plan, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Fort Meyers, FL. Technical Report 09-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J.D., & Paterson, J. (2011). Are we adapting to climate change? Global Environmental Change, 21, pp. 25-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, M., & Beavers, R. (2008). George Wright Forum, Protecting Cultural Resources in U.S. National Parks from Climate Change, 25(2), pp. 86-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Ocean Solutions. (2011). Decision Guide: Selecting Decision Support Tools for Marine Spatial Planning. The Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, California. Environmental Modelling Software. 26(5), pp.593-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Agor, M.L., Muñoz-Carpena, R., Kiker, G., Emanuelsson, A., & Linkov I. (2011) Exploring sea level rise vulnerability of coastal habitats through global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Environmental Modelling Software. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.

  • Clark, W., Kassakian, J., & Titus, J.G. (2010). North Carolina. In The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, Volume 1.. Report by North Carolina Seagrant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. pp. 889-1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concannon, T., Hussain, M., Hudgens, D., & Titus, J.G. (2010). Georgia. In The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 2: New England and the Southeast. Report by the Coastal Georgia Regional Development Commission to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, pp. 255-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Montreal. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/gbo/gbo3-final-en.pdf.

  • Cooley, D. & Olander, L. (2011). Stacking ecosystem services payments: Risks and solutions. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Report NI WP 11-04, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.J.P., Beevers, M.D., & Oppenheimer, M. (2005). Future sea-level rise and the New Jersey coast. Science Technology and Policy Program, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, S., Herr, D., Tamelander, J., Laffoley, D., & Vandever, J. (2011). Mitigating Climate Change through Restoration and Management of Coastal Wetlands and Near-shore Marine Ecosystems. Environmental Department Paper 121, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, M.E., Schubel, J.R., Davidson, M.A., Haines, J., & Texeira, K.C. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings from the Sea Level Rise and Inundation Community Workshop, Landsdowne, VA, Dec 3-5 2009. Sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Geological Survey, 81pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.E. (2011). Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 2004 – 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.E., & Johnson, C.E. (1991). Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States, Mid-1970’s to Mid-1980’s. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (U.S. Department Of Energy). (2011). 2010 Renewable Energy Data Book. Retrieved from http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/pdfs/51680.pdf.

  • EPRI (Electronic Power Research Institute). (2011). Mapping and Assessment of the United States Ocean Wave Energy Resource. Palo Alto, CA: 1024637. Retrieved from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/water/pdfs/mappingandassessment.pdf.

  • Ferdaña, Z., Newkirk, S., Whelchel, A.W., Gilmer, B., & Beck, M.W. (2010). Building Interactive Decision Support to Meet Management Objectives for Coastal Conservation and Hazard Mitigation on Long Island, New York, USA, in Andrade Pérez, A., Herrera Fernandez, B. and Cazzolla Gatti, R. (Eds.) Building Resilience to Climate Change: Ecosystem-based adaptation and lessons from the field. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 72-87. Retrieved from http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2010-050.pdf.

  • Game, E.T., Watts, M.E.,, Wooldridge, S., Possingham, H.P. (2008). Planning for Persistence in Marine Reserves: A Question of Catastrophic Importance. Ecological Applications, 18(3), pp. 670-680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvetz, E.H., Zganjar, C., Raber, G.T., Maurer, E.P., Kareiva, P., et al. (2009). Applied Climate change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0008320

  • Glick, P., Hoffman, J., Koslow, M., Kate, A., & Inkley, D. (2011). Restoring the Great Lakes’ Coastal Future: Technical Guidance for the Design and Implementation of Climate-Smart Restoration Projects. National Wildlife Federation, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Stein, B.A., & Edelson, N.A. (Eds.). (2011). Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A Guide to Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grannis, J. (2011, October). Georgetown Climate Center, Adaptation Tool Kit: Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Land Use. Retrieved from http://www.georgetownclimate.org/resources/adaptation-tool-kit-sea-level-rise-and-coastal-land-use.

  • Green, A., Smith, S.E., Lipsett-Moore, G., Groves, C., Peterson, N., et al. (2009). Designing a resilient network of marine protected areas for Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Oryx, 43, pp. 488–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, R. M., Hansen, L.J., Feifel, K.M., Hitt, J.L., Kershner, J.M., Score, A., & Hoffman, J.R. (2011). The State of Marine and Coastal Adaptation in North America: A Synthesis of Emerging Ideas. EcoAdapt, Banbridge Island, WA. 145 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, R.M. (2010). Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge/Albemarle-Pamlico Peninsula Climate Adaptation Project [Case study on a project of The Nature Conservancy – Nags Head Woods and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – North Carolina]. Product of EcoAdapt’s State of Adaptation Program. Retrieved from http://www.cakex.org/case-studies/682 (Last updated August 2011).

  • Gulf of Mexico Alliance. (2009). Technical Framework for the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan. Habitat Restoration and Conservation Team, Biloxi MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, K.A., French, S.P., Smith, B.T., & Neary, V. (2011, June 29). Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States, Final Project Report to the Wind & Water Power Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-FG36-08GO18174

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, M., Hendel-Blackford, S., Hohne, N., Harvey, B., Naess, L.O., & Urban, F. (2011). Guiding climate compatible development: User-orientated analysis of planning tools and methodologies. Report produced by Ecofys and Institute of Development Studies for the Climate and Development Knowledge Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.J. & Hoffman, J. (2010). Climate Savvy: Adapting Conservation and Resource Management to a Changing World. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Economics, Incorporated. (2011). Development and Implementation of the Climate Assessment and Proactive Response Initiative (CAPRI) For Puget Sound. Report prepared for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program. Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (Eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, 996 pp.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L., Prasad, A.M., Matthews, S., & Peters, M. (2011). Lessons learned while integrating habitat, dispersal, disturbance, and life-history traits into species habitat models under climate change. Ecosystems, 14, pp. 1005-1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K., Rosenzweig, C., Horton, R., Major, D., & Gornitz, V. (2008). MTA adaptations to climate change. A categorical imperative. Metropolitan Transit Authority, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, S. & West, J. (Eds.). (2008). Preliminary Review of Adaptation Options for Climate-Sensitive Ecosystems: Final Report, Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.4. U.S. Climate Change Science Program and Subcommittee on Global Change Research., Washington, DC. 544 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • King County. (2008). Vulnerability of major wastewater facilities to flooding from sea-level rise. Department of Natural Resources and Parks, King County, WA. Also see Feifel, K. (2010). Vulnerability of King County, Washington Wastewater Treatment Facilities to Sea Level Rise [Case study on a project of the King County Wastewater Treatment Division]. Product of EcoAdapt’s State of Adaptation Program. Retrieved from CAKE: http://www.cakex.org/case-studies/719.

  • Linn, C. (2010). Pennsylvania. In The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Report by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. pp. 387-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Department of Natural Resources. (2010). Climate Change Policy: Building Resilience to Climate Change. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcleod, E., Poulter, B., Hinkel, J., Rey, E., & Salm, R. (2010). Sea-level rise impact models and environmental conservation: A review of models and their applications. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53, pp. 507-517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, P. (2010). Treasure Coast. In The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 2: New England and the Southeast. Report by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. pp. 383-466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B.C., Pendleton, L., Jenkins, W.A., & Siflet, S. (2011). Green payments for blue carbon: Economic incentives for protecting threatened coastal habitats. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Report NI R 11-04, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Panel on Climate Change. (2010). Climate change adaptation in New York City: building a risk management response. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1196, pp. 1–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2010). Adapting to Climate Change: A Planning Guide for State Coastal Managers. NOAA Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. Retrieved from http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/climate/adaptation.html.

  • NRC (National Research Council). (2009). Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). (2010). Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, NREL/TP-500-49229.

    Google Scholar 

  • OREC (Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition). (2011). U.S. Marine and Hydrokinetic Renewable Energy Roadmap. Retrieved from http://www.oceanrenewable.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/MHK-Roadmap-Final-November-2011.pdf.

  • Pontee, N.I. & Morris, K. (2011). CoastRanger MS: A tool for improving public engagement. Journal of Coastal Research, 27(1), pp. 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B.L., Westaway, R.M., & Yuen, E.J. (2011a). Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(4), pp. 407–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B.L., Yuen, E.J., & Westaway, R.M. (2011b) Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science, 6(2), pp. 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restore America’s Estuaries, (2011). Jobs and Dollars: Big returns from Coastal Habitat Restoration. Arlington, VA: Restore America’s Estuaries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, E.L., Davidson, J.E. & Graumlich, L.J. (2011). Approaches to evaluating climate change impacts on species: a guide to initiating the adaptation planning process. Environmental Management, 47, pp. 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozum, J.S., Wilson, E., Arnold, C. (2005). Strengthening Integration of Land Use Research and Outreach Through Innovative Web Technology. Journal of Extension, 43(5), Article #5IAW1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snover, A.K., Whitley Binder, L., Lopez, J., Willmott, E., Kay, J., Howell, D., & Simmonds, J. (2007). Preparing for climate change: a guidebook for local, regional, and state governments. In association with and published by ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability, Oakland, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Oregon. (2010). The Oregon Climate Change Adaptation Framework. State of Oregon, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanski, J.J. (2010). New York. In: The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 1: Mid-Atlantic. Report by New York SeaGrant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. pp. 165-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J.G. & Hudgens, D. (2010). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, Volume 1: Mid-Atlantic. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 1260 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J.G. (1998). Rising Seas, Coastal Erosion, and the Takings Clause: How to Save Wetlands and Beaches Without Hurting Property Owners. Maryland Law Review, 56(4), pp. 1279-1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J.G. (2011). Rolling Easements. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 166 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). (2008). Policy Document on the Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Properties, 14pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloz, S., Nur, N., Salas, L., Stralberg, D., Jongsomjit, D., Wood, J., Liu, L., & Ballard, G. (2011). Tidal marsh bird population and habitat assessment for the San Francisco Estuary under future climate change conditions. Report to the California Landscape Conservation Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherland, R.T., Stouffer, R.J., & Dixon, K.W. (2001). Committed warming and its implications for climate change. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(8), pp. 1535-1538, doi:10.1029/2000GL011786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, L. et al. (2012). Adaptation and Mitigation. In: Burkett, V., Davidson, M. (eds) Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities. NCA Regional Input Reports. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-460-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics