Skip to main content

Abstract

At this point in the process, the urban designer can define the project goals and strategies with considerably more precision and thus can arrive at the preliminary draft plan for the study area. Such a concept plan may be viewed as a sketch of possible futures. The designer works with the client to select an option from these possibilities or to create a new option. The designer, in this phase, must characterize preferences and priorities. The outcomes of the environmental context analyses, as well as the assumptions and results from the synthesis, have to be considered. The options the designer develops should be based on clear reasons that can be communicated to the client so that the options can easily be amended, enhanced, or rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Adapted from Steiner et al. 2010. See also SITES 2009. Danielle Pieranunzi of the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center was responsible for compiling this case study.

References

  • Anderson, Larz T., William R. Klein, and Stuart Meck. 2007. “Plan Making.” In Planning and Urban Design Standards, edited by Frederick Steiner and Kent Butler, 3-5. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, Timothy. 2011. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, Timothy, with Peter Newman. 2008. Green UrbanismDown Under:Learningfrom Australia’s Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calatrava, Santiago. 2009. University of South Florida Polytechnic, 2010-2020 Master Plan Update. http://www.poly.usf.edu/Documents/CampusFacilities/I-4/Master-Plan/2010_MASTER_PLAN_UPDATE_091106.pdf (accessed June 17, 2010).

  • Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, Peter, and William Fulton. 2001. The Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Don. 2007. “Urban Design Plans.” In Planning and Urban Design Standards, edited by Frederick Steiner and Kent Butler, 10-13. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civic Alliance. 2002a. Civic Alliance Planning and Design Workshop. http://www.civic-alliance.org (accessed June 16, 2010).

  • Civic Alliance and Regional Plan Association. 2002. A Planning Framework to Rebuild Downtown New York. http://www.rpa.org/civicalliance/pdf/Framework0827.pdf (accessed July 28, 2011).

  • Design Trust for Public Space and City of New York Parks & Recreation. 2010. High Performance Landscape Guidelines: 21st Century Parks for NYC. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010. City and Town Life. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girling, Cynthia, and Ronald Kellett. 2005. Skinny Streets and Green Neighborhoods: Design for Environment and Community. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givoni, Baruch. 1998. Climate Consideration in Building and Urban Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert, and Robert Pirani. 2003. “Sacred and Profane—Remaking Lower Manhattan.” Slideshow presentation at a seminar organized by Danilo Palazzo and Giovanna Fossa, held at the Centro di Cinematografia Scientifica, Milan Polytechnic, February 5, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Commission. 1991. The Ahwahnee Principles. Sacramento, CA: Local Government Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, Anne Whiston. 1984. The Granite Garden: Urban Nature and Human Design. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning (paperback edition). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. Design for a Vulnerable Planet. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick, and Kent Butler, eds. 2007. Planning and Urban Design Standards (student edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick, David Pijawka, and Bill Kasson. 1998. Sustainable Neighborhood Design for the Desert Southwest (final report for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Tempe: School of Planning and Landscape Architecture, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick, Steven Windhager, Mark T. Simmons, Danielle Pieranunzi, and Allan Shearer. 2010. “The Salubrity of Sites.” Journal of Chinese Landscape Architecture 26 (6): 1318. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Task Force. 1999. Toward an Urban Renaissance. London: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Palazzo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Danilo Palazzo and Frederick Steiner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palazzo, D., Steiner, F. (2011). Options. In: Urban Ecological Design. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-226-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships