Abstract
We turn now to practical aspects of the elicitation and analysis of stakeholder preferences and the application of the results to the learning network approach. We suggest that the techniques proposed in this chapter and the next can provide valuable insights into stakeholder preferences and their consequences that might otherwise be overlooked. The linking of preferences to potential consequences may help clarify the role of values in public participatory processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nelson, Robert H. 1999. “The Religion of Forestry: Scientific Management.” Journal of Forestry 97 (11): 4–8.
Pinchot, G. 1947. Breaking New Ground. Washington, DC: Island Press.
USDA Forest Service. 2001a. Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement. Sacramento: USDA Forest Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Island Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balint, P.J., Stewart, R.E., Desai, A., Walters, L.C. (2011). The Sierra Nevada Example: Survey of Stakeholders. In: Wicked Environmental Problems. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7_8
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-047-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)
