Skip to main content

Abstract

The innovative concept of ‘agrobiodiversity’ has emerged in the past 10-15 years at the intersection of biodiversity and agriculture, in an interdisciplinary context that involves various areas of knowledge (agronomy, anthropology, ecology, botany, genetics, conservation biology, etc.). It reflects the dynamic and complex relations among human societies, cultivated plants and domestic animals and the ecosystems in which they interact. Agrobiodiversity is directly associated with food security, health, social equity, hunger alleviation, environmental sustainability and rural sustainable development. In the same way as wild biodiversity, agrobiodiversity has been considered in danger and in great need to be safeguarded through new legal instruments, at the international and national levels. After describing the rationales behind agrobiodiversity, this chapter highlights the various new legal tools applying to agrobiodiversity, which tend to adopt a more systemic view of the agroecosystem as whole, instead of focusing only on specific objects. These new legal instruments consider, for the first time, farmers´rights, agricultural systems as part of cultural heritage and the role of protected areas in promoting agrobiodiversity. The safeguarding of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems is also discussed. There is a rich innovation process going on amongst lawmakers over the last two decades which aims to protect and valorise local and traditional agricultural systems and the rich agrobiodiversity that they encompass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aleman, J., Thomet, M., Bazile, D. and Pham, J.-L., 2010. Central role of nodal farmers in seed exchanges for biodiversity dynamics example of ‘Curadoras’ for the quinoa conservation in mapuche communities in south Chile. In: Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food – ISDA 2010, Montpellier, France. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00530950/fr/.

  • Bioversity International, 2010. Agriculture, agricultural biodiversity and sustainability. 14th meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C., Demeulenaere, E., Thomas, F., Joly, P.B., Allaire, G. and Goldringer, I., 2006. Innover autrement? La recherche face à l’avènement d’un nouveau régime de production et de régulation des savoirs en génétique végétale. In: Gasselin, P. and Clèment, O. (eds.) Quelles variétés et semences pour des agricultures paysannes durables? Les Dossiers de L’Environnement de l’INRA, 30, pp. 29-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, T., Eloy Pereira, L. and Emperaire, L., 2010. Role des dynamiques spatio-temporelles dans la conservation de l’agrobiodiversite des systemes agricoles amerindiens du bas rio Negro (Amazonas, Bresil). In: Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food – ISDA 2010, Montpellier, France. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00512235/fr.

  • Cromwell, E., Cooper, D. and Mulvany, P., 2003. Defining agricultural biodiversity. In: Conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity: a sourcebook, vol. 1. Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP) and Users’ Perspective with Agricultural Research and Development (UPWARD), Manila, Phillipines, pp. 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emperaire, L., Velthem, L.H.V. and Oliveira, A.G., 2008. Patrimônio cultural imaterial e sistema agrícola: o manejo da diversidade agrícola no médio Rio Negro (AM). Presented at the 26th Meeting of the Brazilian Anthropology Association, held between 1-4 June 2008, Porto Seguro, Bahia, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emperaire, L., Almeida, M., Carneiro Da Cunha, M. and Eloy, L., 2010. Innover, transmettre. La diversité agricole en Amazonie brésilienne. In: Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food – ISDA 2010, Montpellier, France. Avaialable at; http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00512260.

  • FAO, 1996. Rome declaration on world food security and world food summit plan of action. World Food Summit, November 13-17, 1996. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2010. Second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/core-themes/theme/seeds-pgr/sow/en.

  • GTZ (German Technical Cooperation), 2006. Agrobiodiversity – the key to food security. Sector project ‘People, Food and Biodiversity’ (Division 45). GTZ, Eschborn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocde, H., Carlos Rosas, J. and Araya, R., 2010. Co-desarrollo de variedades entre agricultores, científicos y profesionales, biodiversidad y otras cosas. In: Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food – ISDA 2010, Montpellier, France. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00531488/fr/.

  • Louwaars, N., 2007. Seeds of confusion: the impact of policies on seed systems. PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozawa, C., Malingan, M., Plantilla, A. and Ong, J., 2008. ‘Evolving culture, evolving landscapes: the Philippine rice terraces’, in Amend, T., Brown, J., Kothari, A., Philipps, A. and Solton, S. (eds.) Protected Landscapes and Agrobiodiversity Values (Values of Protected Landscapes and Seascapes, a series published by the Protected Landscapes Task Force of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas), IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A., 2005. Landscape as a meeting ground: category V protected landscapes/seascapes and world heritage cultural landscapes. In: Brown, J., Mitchell, N. and Beresford, M. (eds.) The Protected Landscape Approach: Linking Nature, Culture and Community. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 19-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, M., 2005. World heritage cultural landscapes: a global perspective. In: Brown, J., Mitchell, N. and Beresford, M. (eds.) The Protected Landscape Approach: Linking Nature, Culture and Community. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 37-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santilli, J., 2005. Socioambientalismo e novos direitos: proteção jurídica à diversidade biológica e cultural. Editora Peiropolis, ISA/IEB, São Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santilli, J., 2012. Agrobiodiversity and the law: regulating genetic resources, food security and cultural diversity. Earthscan, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C., 1986. As plantas cultivadas na América do Sul tropical. In: Ribeiro, B. (ed.) Suma Etnológica Brasileira: Etnobiologia, 3rd ed. Vozes, FINEP, Petrópolis, Brazil, pp. 59-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. and Varaprasad, K.S., 2008. Criteria for identification and assessment of agrobiodivesity heritage sites: evolving sustainable agriculture. Current Science, 94(9), 1131-1138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Santilli .

Editor information

E. Coudel H. Devautour C. T. Soulard G. Faure B. Hubert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santilli, J. (2013). Agrobiodiversity: towards inovating legal systems. In: Coudel, E., Devautour, H., Soulard, C.T., Faure, G., Hubert, B. (eds) Renewing innovation systems in agriculture and food. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-768-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics