Skip to main content

Current commentary: The arc of civil liberation36

  • Chapter
Sacred Science?
  • 738 Accesses

Abstract

This book has offered differing perspectives on the concepts of science and religion, and the intertwining of their roles in modern societies. In the following I wish to take a closer look at three transformative political-symbolic experiences. They are Barack Obama, Tahrir Square, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. These cases serve as examples of how the sacred and profane is placed back into the idea of the secular, and show how they remain at the core of modern life. Our modern society is often perceived as rational, and traditional society as religious. Science, rationality and individual autonomy are given as characteristics of the ethos of modernity, juxtaposed as radically different from what they call traditional society. That is, we only believe what we see before our eyes - a kind of empirical sensibility - whereas traditional society was filled with mysteries. However, people still need broad, metaphysical beliefs and narratives, not necessarily in a super-natural world, but beliefs that are not proven empirically. No matter how sophisticated we are, no matter how much we say that we see ambiguity, we understand it, we can tolerate ambivalence, none the less I believe that certain core convictions are important in social organization. We still need sweeping social passions, symbols, the role of rituals and sentiments in contemporary and so-called secular society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text is based on a Public Lecture given at Tulane University, 26 January 2012. The author thanks Diane Gramms for her suggestions.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g. the complaint by columnist Nicholas Kristof, New York Times, October 1, 2011.

Bibliography

  • Alexander, J.C. 2010. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt. An essay in Cultural Power. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alim, S.H. 2011. What If We Occupied Language? The Opinionator (online). In The New York Times. December 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. 2012. With Bulers and marble Baths, Hospitals Vie for the Affluent Ill. In The New York Times. January 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (in press). The New Arab Revolutions that Shook the World. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, A. 2011. The “Haves” and the “Have-Nots". In The New York Times. October 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoff, N.D. 2011. The Bankers and the Revolutionaries. In The New York Times. October 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelter, B. 2011. Camps Are Cleared, but “99 Percent” Still Occupies the Lexicon. In The New York Times. December 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Alexander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexander, J.C. (2012). Current commentary: The arc of civil liberation36 . In: Øyen, S.A., Lund-Olsen, T., Vaage, N.S. (eds) Sacred Science?. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-752-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics