Abstract
Observed touch refers simply to the process of watching touch to an inanimate or animate object. In many situations, this is a purely visual event. For example, when watching inanimate objects or other people being touched.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Internal References
Alonso, J-M and Chen, Y (2009). Receptive field. Scholarpedia 4(1): 5393. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Receptive_field.
Braitenberg, V (2007). Brain. Scholarpedia 2(11): 2918. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Brain.
Llinas, R (2008). Neuron. Scholarpedia 3(8): 1490. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Neuron.
Ogawa, S and Sung, Y-W (2007). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Scholarpedia 2(10): 3105. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Functional_magnetic_resonance_imaging.
Penny, W D and Friston, KÂ J (2007). Functional imaging. Scholarpedia 2(5): 1478. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Functional_imaging.
Pikovsky, A and Rosenblum, M (2007). Synchronization. Scholarpedia 2(12): 1459. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Synchronization.
Ramachandran, V S and Brang, D (2008). Synesthesia. Scholarpedia 3(6): 3981. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Synaesthesia.
Rizzolatti, G and Fabbri-Destro, M (2008). Mirror neurons. Scholarpedia 3(1): 2055. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Mirror_neurons.
External References
Banissy, M and Ward, J (2007). Mirror touch synaesthesia is linked with empathy. Nature Neuroscience 10: 815–816.
Botvinick, M and Cohen, J (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391: 756.
Ehrsson, H H (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 317: 1048.
Goller, A I et al. (2013). Mirror-touch synaesthesia in the phantom limb of amputees. Cortex 49(1): 243–251.
Graziano, M S; Cooke, D F and Taylor, C S R (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290: 1782–1786.
Graziano, M S A (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 10418–10421.
Halligan, P W et al. (1996). When seeing is feeling: Acquired synaesthesia or phantom touch? Neurocase 2: 21–29.
Halligan, P W et al. (1997). Somatosensory assessment: Can seeing produce feeling? Journal of Neurology 244: 199–203.
Holle, H et al. (2013). Functional and structural brain correlates of mirror-touch synaesthesia. NeuroImage 83: 1041–1050.
Iriki, A et al. (2001). Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neuroscience Research 40: 163–173.
Iriki, A; Tanaka, M and Iwamura, Y (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport 7: 2325–2330.
Ishida, H et al. (2009). Shared Mapping of Own and Others’ Bodies in Visuotactile Bimodal Area of Monkey Parietal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(1): 83–96.
Kennett, S; Taylor-Clarke, M and Haggard, P (2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology 11: 1188–1191.
Keysers, C et al. (2010). Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 417–428.
Lenggenhager, B et al. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317: 1096–1099.
Maravita, A et al. (2002). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science 13: 350–355.
Pavani, F; Spence, C and Driver, J (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 11: 353–359.
Ramachandran, V S and Rogers-Ramachandran, D (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 377–386.
Ramachandran, V S; Rogers-Ramachandran, D and Cobb, S (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature 377: 489–490.
Ro, T et al. (2004). Visual enhancing of tactile perception in the posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 24–30.
Schaefer, M; Heinze, H-J and Rotte, M (2005). Viewing touch improves tactile sensory threshold. NeuroReport 16: 367–370.
Serino, A et al. (2007). Can vision of the body ameliorate impaired somatosensory function? Neuropsychologia 45: 1101–1107.
Serino, A et al. (2009). I Feel what You Feel if You Are Similar to Me. PLoS One 4(3): 7.
Serino, A; Pizzoferrato, F and Ladavas, E (2008). Viewing a face (especially one’s own face) being touched enhances tactile perception on the face. Psychological Science 19: 434–438.
Spence, C; Pavani, F and Driver, J (2004). Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 4: 148–169.
Tipper, S P et al. (1998). Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport 9: 1741–1744.
Tipper, S P et al. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research 139: 160–167.
Tsakiris, M and Haggard, P (2005). The Rubber Hand Illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31: 80–91.
Tsakiris, M et al. (2007). Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex 17: 2235–2244.
Ward, J (2008). The Frog who croaked blue: Synesthesia and the mixing of the senses. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Atlantis Press and the author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ward, J. (2016). Observed Touch. In: Prescott, T., Ahissar, E., Izhikevich, E. (eds) Scholarpedia of Touch. Scholarpedia. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-133-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-133-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-94-6239-132-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-6239-133-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)