Abstract
New media seem to demand a theory of historical repetition. Discussions of new media have begun, with greater insistence in recent years, to refer to the emergence of cinema, to evoke a time when cinema was new media. This is particularly true of discussions of new media concerned with digital cinema, digital animation and video games. Sometimes commentators simply stress the incredible novelty of these new media, and offer more or less detailed descriptions and characterizations of them—in opposition to “old media” such as books or films. Usually, however, it is not enough to sing the newness of new media. For the insistence on newness in opposition to old media inevitably confronts a historical problem. After all, old media were once new. And sometimes old media are renewed—vinyl records can make a comeback, with a different take on their materiality, to be manipulated in specific ways, paused, scratched, skipped. Think of Christian Marclay in the mid 1980s, sanding, cracking, breaking, and repairing records to find new sounds. Thus, even when one wishes merely to enumerate or characterize what is new about new media, one runs into the problem of historical repetition—the problem of the “old new” and the “new new”—not to mention that of the renewed old and the obsolescent new.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Philip Rosen, Change Mummified: Cinema, Historicity, Theory ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001 ), 303–4.
Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985).
Lev Manovich, The Language of New Media ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001 ), 12.
Karl Marx, The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, Second Edition (New York: International Publishers, 1963 ), 15.
Noel Burch, Life to Those Shadows ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990 ), 162.
Miriam Bratu Hansen, “The Mass Production of the Senses: Classical Cinema as Vernacular Modernism;” in Reinventing Film Studies, edited by Christine Gledhill and Linda Williams (London: Arnold, 2000 ), 336.
Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994 ), 15.
Scott McQuire, Visions of Modernity: Representation, Memory, Time and Space in the Age of the Camera ( London: Sage Publications, 1998 ), 70.
Miriam Hansen, “Early Cinema, Late Cinema: Transformations of the Public Sphere,” Screen 34, no. 3 (Autumn 1993): 197–210.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2006 Steven T. Brown
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamarre, T. (2006). The First Time as Farce: Digital Animation and the Repetition of Cinema. In: Brown, S.T. (eds) Cinema Anime. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983084_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983084_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-60621-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8308-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)