Skip to main content

The Effects of Kosovo and the Danger of Decoupling

  • Chapter
Defending Europe
  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

After a period of certainty in the second half of the 1990s, the Atlantic Alliance is once again prey to self-questioning. Retrospectively, the shift occurred in the spring of 1999: upon approaching its fiftieth anniversary, the Alliance that had survived the Cold War and had established itself as the arbiter of European security, appeared to be stronger and more united than ever. Did not the “Allied Force” operation demonstrate just that? But this triumphalism was quickly transformed into skepticism as the “success” celebrated after the Kosovo Crisis gave way to a critical assessment that largely explains the subsequent revival of tension in transatlantic relations, accompanied by a forceful return of the European option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an interpretation of the post-Cold War evolution of the Alliance, see Frédéric Bozo, Where does the Atlantic Alliance Stand? The Improbable Partnership, Les Notes de l’IFRI, no. 6 bis, Paris, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the legal aspects, see Serge Sur, Le Recours à la force dans l’affaire du Kosovo et le droit international, Note d’IFRI, no. 22, Paris, September 2000,

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Catherine Guicherd, “International Law and the War in Kosovo,” Survival 41: 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For a critical analysis of the operation, see Ivo Daalder and Michael O’Hanlon, Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo (Washington: Brookings, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Guillaume Parmentier, “Redressing NATO’s Imbalances,” Survival 42: 2 (Summer 2000), pp. 96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. and Kori Schake, Evaluating NATO’s Efficiency in Crisis Management, Note d’IFRI, no. 21, Paris, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an attempt to interpret the post-Cold War failure at transatlantic rebalancing, see Frédéric Bozo, “The Transatlantic Relationship: Change or Continuity? A European Critique,” in S. Victor Papacosma, Sean Kay, and Mark Rubin, eds., NATO after Fifty Years (Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. On the changes in French policy during this period, see Frédéric Bozo, La France et l’Alliance atlantique depuis la fin de la guerre froide. Le modèle gaullien en question? (Paris: Cahiers du centre d’études d’histoire de la défense, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. These tendencies are well analyzed in Steven Everts, Unilateral America, Lightweight Europe? Managing Divergence in Transatlantic Foreign Policy, Working Paper, Center for European Reform, March 2001, www.cer.organization.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Joseph Fitchett, “U.S. and EU Ponder Defense Trade-Off,” International Herald Tribune, February 8, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. On this point see David C. Gompert, “America and Europe: Partnership, Division of Labor—or Worse?” Lecture to IFRI, March 8, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Such a scheme was outlined several years ago by David C. Gompert and F. Stephen Larrabee, in America and Europe: A Partnership for a New Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). At the time, the situation appeared unpropitious for its realization in that the Alliance, after the dénouement of the crisis in Bosnia, seemed seriously unbalanced; see Frédéric Bozo, Où en est l’Alliance atlantique? Op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  13. On this topic see the analysis by Gilles Andréani, Christoph Bertram, and Charles Grant, Europe’s Military Revolution (London: Center for European Reform, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. On this convergence, see Nicole Gnesotto, L’Europe et la puisssance (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. In William Cohen’s expression, International Herald Tribune, December 6, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bozo, F. (2003). The Effects of Kosovo and the Danger of Decoupling. In: Howorth, J., Keeler, J.T.S. (eds) Defending Europe. Europe in Transition: The NYU European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981363_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics