Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Culture and Religion in International Relations ((CRIR))

Abstract

There have always been people of good will belonging to different faith communities—or none, who in the past have devised peace plans, promoted interfaith dialogue, and in a variety of ways worked for a world without war. A variety of religious groups or religious traditions, Buddhists as well as Quakers and Mennonites, for example, have been committed to peace and conflict resolution as an integral part of their religious tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michael Joseph Smith, “Liberalism and International Reform,” in Terry Nardin and David R. Mapel (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 201–224.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Scott Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation (Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duane Ruth-Heffelbower, The Anabaptists Are Back: Making Peace in a Dangerous World (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mary Kaldor, New & Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Paul Lederach, Building Peace: Sustaining Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jean-Marie Guechenno, “The Impact of Globalization on Strategy,” in Chester A. Crocker, Fen Hampson, and Paula Aall (eds.), Turbulent Peace: The Challenge of Managing International Conflict (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 2001), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Berridge, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adam Watson, Diplomacy: the Dialogue Between States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. David R. Smock (ed.), Interfaith Dialogue and Peacebuilding (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raymond Cohen, Negotiating Across Cultures: International Communication in an Interdependent World (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1991, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph Monville, “Transnationalism and the Role of Track-Two Diplomacy,” in W. Scott Thompson and Kenneth M. Jensen (eds.), Approaches to Peace: An Intellectual Map (Washingtion, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1991), 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Louise Diamond and John McDonald, Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace (West Hartford, CN: Kumarian Press, 3rd edition, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), 280.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. E. H. Carr and Michael Cox (eds.), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2001, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholas J. Wheeler, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David P. Barach, “Religious Inspiration,” in David P. Barach (ed.), Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 199–222;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham, and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999), 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Avruch, P. Black, and J. Scimecca, Conflict Resolution: Cross Cultural Perspectives (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Ross, The Cultures of Conflict: Interpretations and Interests in Comparative Perspective (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. David P. Barash, Introduction to Peace Studies (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paul Salem, “In Theory: A Critique of Western Conflict Resolution From a Non-Western Perspective,” Negotiation Journal, 9, 4 (1993): 361–369;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paul Salem (ed.), Conflict Resolution in the Arab World: Selected Essays (New York: American University of Beruit, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abdul A. Said, Nathan C. Funk, and Ayse S. Kadayifici, Peace and Conflict Resolution in Islam: Precept and Practice (Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. W. Zartman (ed.), Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflict Medicine (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ray Takeyh, “Faith-Based Initiatives: Can Islam Bring Democracy to the Middle East?” Foreign Policy, November/December, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. David R. Smock (ed.), Perspectives on Pacifism: Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Views on Nonviolence and International Conflict (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Douglas Johnston (ed.), Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martin Wight, edited by Gabriele Wight and Brian Porter, International Theory: The Three Traditions (London: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ronald H. Stone, “Introduction,” in Paul Tillich, Theology of Peace, edited and introduced by Ronald H. Stone (Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Douglas Johnston and Cynthia Sampson (eds.), Religion, The Missing Dimension of Statecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Robert Cox, “Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations,” Millennium, 10, 2 (1981): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohammed Abu-Nimer, “The Miracles of Transformation Through Interfaith Dialogue: Are You a Believer?” in David R. Smock (ed.), Interfaith Dialogue and Peacebuilding, 15–32; Marc Gopin, “Conflict Resolution as a Religious Experience: Contemporary Mennonite Peacemaking,” in Marc Gopin, Between Eden and Armageddon: The Future of World Religions, Violence, and Peacemaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brian Cox and Daniel Philpott, “CFIA Task Force Report— Council on Faith & International Affairs,” The Brandywine Review of Faith & International Affairs, 1, 2 (2003): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Max Weber, “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), 267–301.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brian Cox and Daniel Philpott, “CFIATask Force Report: Faith-based Diplomacy,” in The Bradywine Review of Faith & International Affairs, 1, 2 (2003): 31–40; Douglas Johnston and Brian Cox, “Faith-Based Diplomacy and Preventative Engagement,” in Douglas Johnston (ed.), Faith-Based Diplomacy, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brian Cox, “Kashmir Project: Faith-based Reconciliation,” September 12, 2003, Bhurban, Pakistan, Pearl Continental Hotel (photocopy);

    Google Scholar 

  37. Andrew Rigby Justice and Reconciliation: After the Violence (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  38. John W. de Gruchy Reconciliation: Restoring Justice (Minneapolis, MN: Angsburg Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Scott Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation (Oxford: Rowan Littlefield, 2000), 167–204.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Desmond Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness (London: Rider, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  41. Donald W. Shriver, An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995),

    Google Scholar 

  42. Michael Battle, Reconciliation: The Ubuntu Theology of Desmond Tutu (New York: Pilgrim Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  43. George Irani, “Rituals of Reconciliation: Arabic-Islamic Perspectives,” Mind and Human Interaction: Windows Between History, Culture, Politics, and Psychoanalysis, 11, 4 (2000): 226–245; Faith-Based NGOs and International Peacebuilding, special report (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute for Peace, October 22, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marc Gopin, Holy War, Holy Peace: How Religion Can Bring Peace to the Middle East (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Lyn S. Graybill, Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Miracle or Model? (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  46. Charles Villa-Vincencio and Wilhelm Verwoerd (eds.), Looking Back, Reaching Forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (London: Zed Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Robert Kaplan, Balkan Ghosts (New York: Vintage, 1994), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mitchell Cohn, “Rooted Cosmopolitanism,” in Nicholaus Mills (ed.), Legacy of Dissent: 40 Tears of Writing from Dissent Magazine (New York: Touchstone Books, 1994), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roland H. Hainton, Christian Attitudes Toward War and Peace (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1960), 17–32;

    Google Scholar 

  50. Terry Nardin (ed.), The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  51. David Barash, “Negative Peace,” in David Barash (ed.), Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  52. David Barash, “Positive Peace,” in David Barash (ed.), Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Connie Peck and David A. Hamburg, Sustainable Peace (Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  54. Richard Smoke, Paths to Peace: Exploring the Feasibility of Sustainable Peace (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boutros Boutro-Ghali, An Agenda for Peace: Preventative Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping (New York: United Nations, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  56. John Paul Lederach, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Faith-Based NGOs and International Peacebuilding, special report, U.S. Institute for Peace, Washington, DC, October 22, 2001; Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  58. N. Dower, “Development, Violence and Peace: A Conceptual Exploration,” The European Journal of Development Research, 11, 2 (1999): 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Scott M. Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, S.M. (2005). Soulcraft as Statecraft? Diplomacy, Conflict Resolution, and Peacebuilding. In: The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973993_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics