Skip to main content

Abstract

In undergraduate curriculum research and teaching are two inseparable domains. Following this, attempt has been made to identify six faculty members’ views of integrating research into teaching of undergraduate curriculum in the APEX (Universiti Sains Malaysia) status awarded research university using qualitative interviews. The findings obtained indicate that all the faculty members viewed that integration is imperative. However, extent of integration and challenges faced were viewed differently. The outcome of the study reflects on the university’s transformation plan to achieve the world-class status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altbach, P.G. 2011. “The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University.” In The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World Class Research Universities, ed. P.G. Altbach & J.Salmi. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. 11–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. 2013. “Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: the role of research universities in developing countries.” Studies in Higher Education, No. 38 (3): 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaratunga, D. and Senaratne, S. 2009. “Principles of integrating research into teaching in higher education: built environment perspective.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, No. 5: 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto, A. 2010. “Differentiation and Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning in the Knowledge Society: from the perspective of Japan, Keynote Address.” In The Changing Academic Profession in the International and Quantitative Perspectives: A Focus on Teaching and Learning Activities, RIHE International Seminar Reports, No. 15, Hiroshima University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elen, J., Ylanne, S.L., and Clement, M. 2007. “Faculty Development in Research-Intensive Universities: The role of academics’ conceptions on the relationship between research and teaching.” International Journal for Academic Development, No. 12(2): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, UK. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., and Marsh, H.W. 1996. “The relationship between research and teaching: A meta analysis.” Review of Educational Research, No. 66: 507–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. 2005. “Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning.” In Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, ed. R. Barnett. McGraw Hill: Open University Press. 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishak, I., Haron, H., and Marimuthu, M. 2013. USM and the APEX Journey Governance, Performance, Human Resources and Service Quality. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. 2004. A Guide to the Research Evidence on Teaching-Research Relationships. York, UK. Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., Breen, R., and Lindsay, R. 2003. Re-Shaping Higher Education: Linking Teaching and Research. London, UK. SEDA and Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloser, J.M., Brownell, E.S., Chiariello, N.R., and Fukami, T. 2011. “Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education.” Plos Biology, No. 9(11): 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Higher Education 2007. “National higher education strategic plan 2020.” Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.my/en/pelan-strategik-pengajian-tinggi-negara. Accessed September 21, 2013.

  • Prince, M.J., Felder, R.M., and Brent, R. 2007. “Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies.” Journal Of Engineering Education, No. 96(4): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, J.C., and Kehm, B.M. 2013. “World-class university in different systems and contexts.” In Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, eds. J.C. Shin & M.B. Kehm. Heidelberg: Springer. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J.C., and Cummings, W. 2010. “Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research.” Scientometrics, No. 85(2): 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirat, M. 2013. “Malaysia’s World-Class University Ambition: An Assessment.” In Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, eds. J.C. Shin and M.B. Kehm. Heidelberg: Springer. 205–223.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, Mageswary Karpudewan and Munir Shuib

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zain, A.N.M., Karpudewan, M., Shuib, M. (2015). Integrating Research into Teaching in the APEX University in Malaysia. In: Collins, C.S., Neubauer, D.E. (eds) Redefining Asia Pacific Higher Education in Contexts of Globalization: Private Markets and the Public Good. International and Development Education. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137559203_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics