Skip to main content

Scalability of the Creative System in the Recording Studio

  • Chapter
The Creative System in Action

Abstract

The systems model of creativity includes three specific elements — domain, field and agent — that dynamically interact in an ongoing process of circular causality (Csikszentmihalyi 1988). The agent must draw from the domain during creative work in order to select a suitable arrangement of ingredients from this body of knowledge and symbol system. This selection of ingredients is then presented to the field, the social organization that recognizes, uses and alters the domain, for evaluation (Csikszentmihalyi 1997). In the context of commercial record production this process occurs when the completed record is released to the public and the field of record production (TV, radio, popular-music press, other musicians, engineers and producers, etc.) decides upon the record’s novelty and its relevant addition to the domain through a complex and non-linear process. However, during the production of a record, the scale of the systems model of creativity appears to be too large to be applicable to the participants inside the recording studio. For this reason, the generation of ideas, and the internal evaluative processes that occur on an individual basis, have been largely ignored in the literature in relation to a systems approach. Relatively few of the group processes too that occur during a collaborative situation, such as making a recording in the studio, have been explored using a systems framework (Sawyer 2000, 2003). Susan Kerrigan’s revised systems model (2013) provides a solution to this apparent difference in scale by suggesting that the domain and the field can be re-contextualized so that they apply to the specific context of the creative task. The interaction between the system’s elements can then be observed in action as a group of people collaborate on a creative product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bastick, T. (1982) Intuition: How We Think and Act (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (1994) Dimensions of Creativity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bon Jovi, J. and Sambora, R. (1987) ‘Wanted Dead or Alive’ [Audio CD], Mercury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988) ‘Society, Culture and Person: A Systems View of Creativity’, in R. Sternberg (ed.) The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (Cambridge University Press), pp. 325–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (New York: HarperCollins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2002) How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education (London: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2013) ‘Accommodating Creative Documentary Practice within a Revised Systems Model of Creativity’, Journal of Media Practice, 14(2), 111–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre K. C. (2011) ‘Rethinking the Creative Process: The Systems Model of Creativity Applied to Popular Songwriting’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 4, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2012) Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962) ‘The Associative Basis of the Creative Process’, Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1993) ‘Giftedness as Critical Creative Thought’, in N. Colangelo, S. Assouline and D. L. Ambroson (eds) Talent Development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, vol. 2 (Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press), pp. 239–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. and Okuda, S. M. (1991) ‘The Instructional Enhancement of the Ideational Originality and Flexibility Scores of Divergent Thinking Tests’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2000) ‘Improvisation and the Creative Process: Dewey, Collingwood and the Aesthetics of Spontaneity’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(2), 149–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2003) Group Creativity: Music, Theatre, Collaboration (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. ([1926] 1976) ‘Stages in the Creative Process’, in A. Rothenberg and C. Hausman (eds) The Creativity Question (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorski-Thomas, S. (2014) The Musicology of Record Production (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, A. (2001) The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records (London: University of California Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Paul Thompson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, P. (2016). Scalability of the Creative System in the Recording Studio. In: McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., Paton, E. (eds) The Creative System in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509468_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics