Skip to main content
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Political philosophers, almost without exception, opposed mass involvement in politics. Instead, they proposed that the art of ruling was a specialized, technical skill, which could be attained only by the few men who had the right combination of aristocratic lineage alongside proper education and training. In this chapter, a quick review is given of the basic ideas of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. It concludes that this trio, the most important thinkers at Athens, were staunch opponents of self-governance and political equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Larry Patriquin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patriquin, L. (2015). Elite Critics of Popular Rule. In: Economic Equality and Direct Democracy in Ancient Athens. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503480_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics