Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Framing Risk and Uncertainty in Social Science Articles on Climate Change, 1995–2012

  • Chapter
Communicating Risk

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

Abstract

The issue of climate change is intimately linked to notions of risk and uncertainty, concepts that pose challenges to climate science, climate change communication, and science-society interactions. While a large majority of climate scientists are increasingly certain about the causes of climate change and the risks posed by its impacts (see IPCC, 2013 and 2014), public perception of climate change is still largely framed by uncertainty, especially regarding impacts (Poortinga et al., 2011). Social scientists and communication researchers have begun to advocate moving from a framing of climate change in terms of uncertainty to one that focuses on risk (Painter, 2013; Silverman, 2013) and they hope that this shift in framing may generate greater public support for climate mitigation policies.

This research has been funded by the ORA-NWO grant number 464-10-077 and by ESRC ORA grant number RES-360-25-0068. (Climate Change as a Complex Social Issue).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baer, P. (2005). Anchors Away: Why it’s Time for the IPCC to Get Rid of the 1.5–4.5º Range and Replace it with an Evaluation of PDFs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UC Berkely).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1986). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1995). Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, L., Bosch, P., Canziani, O., Chen, Z., Christ, R., Davidson, O. and Yohe, G. (2007). IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blüdhorn, I. (2007). Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation. Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, 2, 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzen, W., Bergh, J. and Bouwer, L. (2010). Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: A global perspective and an assessment for the Netherlands. Natural Hazards, Vol. 52, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzen, W.J. and Jeroen, C.J.M. van den Bergh (2012). Monetary valuation of insurance against flood risk under climate change. International Economic Review, Vol. 53, 3, 1005–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budescu, D.V., Broomell, S.B. and Por, H. (2009). Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychological Science, Vol. 20, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, D. (2014, May 19th). Taming the floods, Dutch-style. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/19/floods-dutch-britain-netherlands

  • Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jaeger, J. and Mitchell, R.B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Procedures of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 100, 14, 8086–8091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Committee (2008). The Climate Change Act and UK regulations. Retrieved from http://www.theccc.org.uk/tackling-climate-change/the-legal-landscape/global-action-on-climate-change/

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2010). Flood Management Act. Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S. (2011). High impact, low probability? An empirical analysis of risk in the economics of climate change. Climatic Change, Vol. 108, 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S. and Fankhauser, S. (2010). Environmental prices, uncertainty, and learning. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, 2, 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillerment, M.L. and Tol, R. (2008) Decision making under catastrophic risk and learning: the case of the possible collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Climatic Change, Vol. 91, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.W., Lempert, R.J., Keller, K., Hackbarth, A., Mijere, C. and McInerney, D.J. (2012). Robust climate policies under uncertainty: a comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Analysis, Vol. 10, 1657–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why we Disagree about Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013). Summary for policymakers, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Stocker, T.F, Plattner, G.-K, Tignor, M. and Allen, S.K. et al. (Eds.) Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGI_AR5_SPM_brochure.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S.N., Landstrom, C. and Whatmore, S. (2011). Imagining flood futures: Risk assessment and management in practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A., Vol. 369, 1942, 1784–1806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., Franca Doria, M., Hayes, K. and Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 15, 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D. (1990). Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxim, L. and van der Sluijs, J.P. (2011) Quality in environmental science for policy: Assessing uncertainty as a component of policy analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 14, 482–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1991). Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, B. (2010). ‘Climategate’: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, Vol. 19, 419–442. doi: 10.3197/096327110X531543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202009/Nisbet-full.html

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, G. (2000). Reviewing the uncertainties in climate change science. Area, Vol. 32, 4, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming — Global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 18, 4, 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2013). Climate Change in the Media: Reporting risk and Uncertainty. London: I.B Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N. and Fischoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 1, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N. (2012). Climate change risk perception and communication: Addressing a critical moment? Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, 6, 951–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S. and Pidgeon, N. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 21, 3, 1015–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlinski, J.J. (2000). The psychology of global climate change. University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 1, 299–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2011). A comment to Ragnar Lofstedt: Risks versus hazards. European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 2, 3, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, H. (2010). Green Gone Wrong. Dispatches from the Front Lines of Eco-Capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar, H., Mees, H., Wardekker, A., van der Sluijs, J and Driessen, P. (2012) Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: Stimuli and barriers, Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 12, 777–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. and Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecological Economics, Vol. 109, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, H. (2013, October 4th). Amidst Uncertainty, Perceiving risk. (Web log comment) Retrieved from http://www.solvingforpattern.org/2013/10/18/amidst-uncertainty-perceiving-risk/

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefan, S. (2008) Approaching the tipping point — Climate risks, faith and political action. European Journal of Science and Theology, Vol.4, 2, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. and Zinn, J.O., Eds. (2006). Risk in Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J. (2003). Introduction, in Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventative Public Policy. Tickner, J. (Ed). (pp. xiii–xvii). Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, J. (2013). Applying science to communicate science, ARS Technica http://arstechnica.com/staff/2013/08/applying-science-to-communicate-science/. Accessed 2nd March 2015.

  • Veraart, J. A. and Bakker, M. (2009). Climateproofing The Netherlands, in Climate Change Adaptation in the Water Sector. F. Ludwig, B. Kabat, H. van Schaik, and M. van der Valk (Eds.) (pp. 110–122). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 21, 690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. and Jasanoff, F. (1998). Science and decision making, in Human Choices and Climate Change vol. 1. The Societal Framework. Rayner, S. and Malone, E. (Eds.) (pp. 1–112) Ohio: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christopher Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iina Hellsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brigitte Nerlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, Australia

    Jonathan Crichton (Senior Lecturer) (Senior Lecturer)

  2. Macquarie University, Australia

    Christopher N. Candlin (Professor) & Arthur S. Firkins (Researcher) (Professor) &  (Researcher)

Copyright information

© 2016 Christopher Shaw, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaw, C., Hellsten, I., Nerlich, B. (2016). Framing Risk and Uncertainty in Social Science Articles on Climate Change, 1995–2012. In: Crichton, J., Candlin, C.N., Firkins, A.S. (eds) Communicating Risk. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_13

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55659-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47878-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation