Abstract
This chapter traces some of the difficulties associated with the definition of CFS/ME to a two-classification problem. Medical conditions are usually classified either as ‘psychiatric ’ or as ‘physical ’ although ome, such as CFS/ME, have been given both labels at different times. This duality of classifications is based on a mind-body dualism that is unhelpful. A ‘taxonomic ’ approach to CFS/ME has proved more useful than an approach based purely on the unique narratives of individuals. Confusions surrounding both psychiatric classification and conditions such as CFS/ME could be resolved by classifying all of these solely under the heading of neurology, since their symptoms ultimately originate from alterations in the functioning of the brain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
White, P. D., Rickards, H., & Zeman, A. Z. J. (2012) Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illness. British Medical Journal, May 24. 344: e3454
White, P. D., Rickards, H., & Zeman, A. Z. J. (2012) Classifying mental and neurological conditions together: authors’ reply to letters. British Medical Journal, July 23. 345: e4906
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision. Volume 2 (2010). World Health Organisation.
Plato. Republic IV. 433a
Descartes, R. (1647) The Passions of the Soul. Translated by Stephen Voss 1989. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Descartes, R. (2008/1637) A Discourse on the Method. Translated by Ian Maclean (2008). Oxford University Press.
Freud, S. (1921) Jenseits des Lustprinzips (Beyond the Pleasure Principle). Internationaler Psychoanalytyscher Verlag GMBH.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders.
American Psychiatric Association Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5 http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/changes%20from%20dsm-iv-tr%20to%20dsm-5.pdf
Bogousslavsky, J., & Moulin, T. (2009) From Alienism to the birth of modern psychiatry: A neurological story? European Neurology, 62: 257–263.
Bullmore, E., Fletcher, P., & Jones, P. B. (2009) Why Psychiatry can’t afford to be Neurophobic. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194: 293–295.
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 9: 357–381.
Haber, S. N. (2003) The primate basal ganglia: Parallel and integrative networks. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 26: 317–330.
Lakhan, S. E., Vieira, K., & Hamlat, E. (2010) Biomarkers in psychiatry: Drawbacks and potential for misuse. Archives of Internal Medicine, 3: 1.
Zandi, M., Irani, S., Lang, B. et al. (2011) Disease-relevant auto-antibodies in first episode schizophrenia. Journal of Neurology, 258: 686–688.
Ehrenreich, H., & Nave, K.-A. (2014) Phenotype-based genetic association studies (PGAS) Towards Understanding the contribution of common genetic variants to schizophrenia sub-types. Genes, 5(1): 97–105.
Heim, C., Wagner, D., Maloney, E. et al. (2006) Early adverse experience and risk for chronic fatigue syndrome. JAMA Psychiatry, 63: 1258–1266.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Hugh Rickards
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rickards, H. (2015). Diagnostically Speaking: How should CFS/ME Be Classified — and Does it Matter?. In: Ward, C.D. (eds) Meanings of ME: Interpersonal and Social Dimensions of Chronic Fatigue. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467324_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467324_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69129-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46732-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)