Skip to main content
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a future scenario where the Internet develops into an autonomous ‘brain.’ That brain could emerge as one of four types: (1) a globe-spanning encyclopedia, an otherwise inert collection of all of the world’s information that responds to our queries, (2) a network of the ‘best brains,’ allowing us to query a topic or problem and solving it through a kind of collective human intelligence, 3) a system driven by algorithms acting upon mountains of data that feeds back ideas and suggestions to us, the system being designed to ‘nudge’ us into action, and (4) a fully conscious and autonomous intelligence, possibly in competition with the biological brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Nicholas Carr, ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid?’ The Atlantic, July/August 2008, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868/; The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains (New York: W.W. Norton, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carr discusses the vision of a global library, and also the legal and technical issues of building one, in ‘The Library of Utopia,’ MIT Technology Review, April 25, 2012, http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/427628/the-library-of-utopia/

  3. See also Peter Singer, ‘Whither the dream of the universal library?’ The Guardian, April 19, 2011, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/19/moral-imperative-create-universal-library On the long and problematic history of the idea of a Universal Library,

    Google Scholar 

  4. see Ken Hillis, Michael Petit and Kylie Jarrett, Google and the Culture of Search (New York: Routledge, 2013), 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.G. Wells, World Brain (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Doran and Co., 1938), 69–70. ‘A world Encyclopedia no longer presents itself to a modern imagination as a row of volumes printed and published once for all, but as a sort of mental clearing house for the mind, a depot where knowledge and ideas are received, sorted, summarized, digested, clarified and compared. It would be in continual correspondence with every competent discussion, every survey, every statistical bureau in the world. It would develop a directorate and a staff of men of its own type, specialized editors and summarists. They would be very important and distinguished men in the new world. This Encyclopedia organization need not be concentrated in one place; it might have the form of a network. It would centralize mentally but perhaps not physically. Quite possibly it might to a large extent be duplicated. It is its files and its conference rooms which would be the core of its being, the essential Encyclopedia. It would constitute the material beginning of a real World Brain.’

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vannevar Bush, ‘As We May Think,’ The Atlantic, July 1, 1945, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caroline S. Wagner, The New Invisible College: Science for Development (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008), 2. ‘Self-organizing networks that span the globe are the most notable feature of science today. These networks constitute an invisible college of researchers who collaborate not because they are told to but because they want to, who work together not because they share a laboratory or even a discipline but because they can offer each other complementary insight, knowledge, or skills.’

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael Nielsen, Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffrey Stibel, Wired for Thought: How the Brain is Shaping the Future of the Internet (Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2009), ii–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clive Thompson, ‘A Sense of Place,’ Wired, February 2013, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. On the idea of a kitchen with ‘ambient intelligence,’ see Donald Norman, The Design of Future Things (New York: Basic Books, 2007), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. On the implications of such networking for medicine and health care, see Eric Topol, The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care (New York: Basic Books, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albert-Laszlo Barabasi observes that, because we are able to capture more and more of the data that we collectively produce every day, we will very soon be able to uncover the underlying patterns in human behavior such that we will be able to predict (and control?) that behavior. See Bursts: The Hidden Pattern Behind Everything We Do (New York: Dutton, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brian David Johnson, ‘The Secret Life of Data in the Year 2020,’ The Futurist, July-August 2012, 21. ‘With the massive amount of sensors we have littering our lives and landscapes, we’ll have information spewing from everywhere. Our cars, our buildings, and even our bodies will expel an exhaust of data, information, and is and os at an incredible volume:

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffrey J. Selingo, College (Un) Bound: The Future of Higher Education and What It Means for Students (Boston: New Harvest, 2013), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al Gore, The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change (New York: Random House, 2013), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  18. In 2002, Ben Goertzel wrote that ‘The Internet as it is today is just a little baby. But it’s on the verge of a fundamental transition. Today it’s a distributed network of content and software, serving diverse people diverse functions. Soon enough it will be a self-organizing intelligent system, with its own high-level coherent patterns, serving not only as a mind but as a world inhabited by a diversity of digital life forms.’ (ix) See Creating Internet Intelligence: Wild Computing, Distributed Digital Consciousness, and the Emerging Global Brain (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Ray Kurzweil, How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed (New York: Viking, 2012), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ray Kurzweil, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (New York: Penguin, 2005), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. An interesting meditation on this idea is George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy In The Flesh: The Embodied Mind And Its Challenge To Western Thought (New York: Basic Books, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 David J. Staley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Staley, D.J. (2014). Query. In: Brain, Mind and Internet: A Deep History and Future. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460950_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics