Skip to main content
  • 183 Accesses

Abstract

Is the Internet making us stupid? There is a growing body of research that suggests that the Internet is rewiring the synaptic patterns of our brains, which for some is a cause for alarm. All symbolic technologies — not just the Internet — have rewired our brains, and thus the Internet is unremarkable in this way. In particular, the Internet appears to encourage associative and analogical — rather than linear and logical — thinking. The brain is indeed linear and logical, but the brain has also proven to be analogical and associative, capable of making connections between disparate objects and data points, and has long been doing so. The Internet has not dulled our minds but has instead unleashed this pre-existing, if undervalued, portion of our cognitive architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Nicholas Carr, ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid?’ The Atlantic, July/August 2008, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868/ See also Nicholas Carr, The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains (WW. Norton and Co., 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Katherine Hayles, How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), 10. ‘The proposition that humans coevolved with the development and transport of tools is not considered especially controversial among paleoanthropologists. For example, the view that bipedalism coevolved with tool manufacture and transport is widely accepted. Walking on two legs freed the hands, and the resulting facility with tools bestowed such strong adaptive advantage that the development of bipedalism was further accelerated.’

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambros Malafouris, How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013), 247.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stanislas Dehaene, Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention (New York: Viking, 2009), 302.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, ‘The Remaking of Reading: Data Mining and the Digital Humanities.’ NSF Symposium on Next Generation of Data Mining and Cyber-Enabled Discovery for Innovation, October 11, 2007, 1–2. http://www.csee.umbc.edu/-hillol/NGDMo7/abstracts/talks/MKirschenbaum.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. David Bolter, Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print, second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This is the observation of Horst Bredekamp, in The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art and Technology (Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 1995), esp. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barbara Maria Stafford, Visual Analogy: Consciousness as the Art of Connecting (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999), 169.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jason Palmer, ‘Brain works more like internet than “top down” company,’ BBC News, August 10, 2010, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10925841

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 David J. Staley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Staley, D.J. (2014). Reconfigure. In: Brain, Mind and Internet: A Deep History and Future. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460950_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics