Skip to main content
  • 2110 Accesses

Abstract

For much of the twentieth century there existed a general amorphous quality in the concept of schizophrenia. At various times, and in various places, this amorphous nature readily allowed schizophrenia conceptualisation to work in ways that seem antithetical to science. In various ways, schizophrenia conceptualisation permeated, and could be permeated by numerous cultural beliefs, values, imperatives, and attitudes that now disturb us. For to further their descriptions of madness, many in psychiatry and related professions, readily adopted society’s prejudices as ancillary symptoms or signs. And over time a slow accretion of miscreants took place within the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Kieran McNally

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McNally, K. (2016). Social Prejudice. In: A Critical History of Schizophrenia. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456816_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics