Skip to main content
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

Humans are not rational calculating machines. They suffer from a tremendous number of cognitive biases. For instance, they are not good at computing and distinguishing between probabilities; they overestimate the probability of recent or more salient events, and their degree of control over events; they are overconfident and overly optimistic; they search for and remember information that confirms their beliefs, and stick to their beliefs when presented disconfirming evidence. While humans may or may not consciously recognize their biases, psychoanalytic theory tells us that human behavior is also influenced strongly by unconscious fantasies. These fantasies and projections are among some of the deepest assumptions that humans have. In this chapter, we highlight the importance of constantly questioning our deepest assumptions about the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Keynes, John M., Essays in Biography in Collected Writings, Vol. 10, 1933, p. 447.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freud, Sigmund, “Formulations regarding the two principles of mental functioning;” The Standard Edition of The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12, Hogarth, London, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klein, Melanie, Love, Guilt and Reparation, and Other Works: 1921–1945, Karnac Books, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tuckett, David, and Tafller, Richard, “Phantastic objects and the financial market’s sense of reality: a psychoanalytic contribution to the understanding of stock market instability,” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2008, pp. 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, Michael J., Dimitrov, Orlin, and Rau, P. Raghavendra, “A Rose.com by any other name,”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2001, pp. 2371–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodnight, G. Thomas, and Green, Sandy, “Rhetoric, risk, and markets: the dot-com bubble;” Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 96, No. 2, 2010, pp. 115–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, Michael J., Khorana, Ajay, Osobov, Igor, Patel, Ajay, and Rau, P. Raghavendra “Managerial actions in response to a market downturn: valuation effects of name changes in the dot.com decline;” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005, pp. 319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stulz, Rene, “Hedge funds: past, present, and future;” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2007, pp. 175–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. See Llam, and R. McFall, “Portfolios of alternative assets: why not 100% hedge funds?” The Journal of Investing, Vol. 8 No. 4. 1999, pp. 87–97;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Modigliani, Leah, “Quantitative aspects of analyzing risk — are hedge funds worth it?” in Lake, Ronald, A. (Ed.), Evaluating and Implementing Hedge Fund Strategies, 2nd ed., Euromoney Institutional Investor, London, 1999, pp. 326–9;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schneeweis, Thomas, Karavas, Vassilios N., and Georgiev, Georgi, Alternative Investments in the Institutional Portfolio, Alternative Investment Management Association, London, 2000;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arman, Eshraghi, and Taffler, Richard, “Hedge funds and unconscious fantasy;” Accounting, Auditing e’r Accountability Journal, Vol. 5, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1244–65.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stulz, Rene, Malkiel, Burton G., and Saha, Atanu, “Hedge funds: risk and return,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6, 2005, pp. 80–8;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregoriou, Greg, Funds of Hedge Funds: Performance, Assessment, Diversification, and Statistical Properties, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2006;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin, John, and Xu, Jin, “How smart are the smart guys? A unique view from hedge fund stock holdings;” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2331–70;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dichev, Ilia D., and Yu, Gwen, “Higher risk, lower returns: what hedge fund investors really earn,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2011, pp. 248–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eshraghi and Taffler, “Hedge funds and unconscious fantasy”; Lowenstein, R., When Genius Failed: The Rise and Fall of Long-Term Capital Management, Random House, New York, NY, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Markopolos, Harry, No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller, Wiley, New York, NY, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Ian I. Mitroff and Can M. Alpaslan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitroff, I.I., Alpaslan, C.M. (2014). Economic Crises. In: The Crisis-Prone Society: A Brief Guide to Managing the Beliefs that Drive Risk in Business. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454836_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics