Abstract
Even though the book looks at three specific countries (Botswana, Ethiopia and South Africa), one departs from a generalised idea of the ‘African state’. The purpose of framing the debate around a generalisation has to do with a usual methodological approach to the study of African politics, which departs from generalisations towards specific countries or issue areas. According to leading Africa scholar Jean-François Bayart, this should not imperil the research ‘since geographical proximity has none the less brought about a relative commonality of historical destiny, of which the colonial interlude is only of secondary importance’ (Bayart, 2009: 34). As the same author further claims, ‘[this] allows us to construct a scientific object, to circumscribe a political area in a comparative perspective, even to talk of an “African” civilisation in the sense intended by Braudel as a reality of “great, inexhaustible length”’ (Bayart, 2009).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Ricardo Pereira
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pereira, R. (2014). International Developments of States in Africa. In: Recipient States in Global Health Politics. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442970_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442970_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49524-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44297-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)