Skip to main content

Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate

  • Chapter
Corpora and Discourse Studies

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics ((PADLL))

Abstract

In this chapter we examine discourses on the social media site Twitter around people who receive government support (commonly referred to as benefits), in the UK. Between 2008–2009 and 2011–2012, the UK experienced recession, and after coming to power in 2010 the Conservative-led coalition government embarked on a program of fiscal austerity that included cuts to some benefits. Baker (forthcoming) analysed the discourse around benefits in Britain’s most widely-read newspaper The Sun (a conservative tabloid), comparing the years 2002 and 2012. In 2012, the discourse around benefits was less sympathetic towards many types of benefit recipients, with the newspaper notably focusing on two constructions: benefits cheats and benefits culture, which respectively resulted in negative stories at the level of both the individual and the wider society. The newspaper painted a compelling picture of a benefits system created by the previous government that was both too soft and open to abuse and thus in need of reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism ( London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, Laurence. (2011) AntConc (Version 3.2.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available at: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (forthcoming) ‘Making the needy look greedy: Using corpus methods to examine The Sun’s discourse around benefits’, in J. Rahilly and V. Vander (eds.) Crossing Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in Language Studies (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bossy, J. (2002) ‘Moral arithmetic: Seven sins into Ten Commandments’, in E. Leites (ed.) Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 214–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism ( London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brezina, V., McEnery, T. and Wattam, S. (2015) ‘Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocational networks’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., Bourhis, A. and Jacob, R. (2005) ‘The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (2): 145–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge ( London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane, E. A. (2014) ‘Beyond antifandom: Cheerleading textual hate and new media ethics’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (2): 175–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (2013) The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. Second Edition ( New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, D. (2005) Framing Class: Media Representations of Wealth and Poverty in America ( Rowmand & Littlefield: Lanham MD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboreiro, G., Sarmento, L., Teixeira, J. and Oliveira, E. (2010) ‘Tokenizing microblogging messages using a text classification approach’, in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. Toronto: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (1896) The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind ( New York: The Macmillan Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M. K. (2005) ‘Poverty, charity, and coercion in Elizabethan England’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 35 (3): 457–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968) ‘The Matthew effect in science’, Science, 159 (3810): 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1982) What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse ( New York: Academic).

    Google Scholar 

  • OUP Dictionary Team (2009) RT This: OUP Dictionary Team Monitors Twitterer’s Tweets. Available at: http://blog.oup.com/2009/06/oxford-twitter/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R., Yoon, H.-S. and Hirschl, T. A. (2003) ‘American poverty as a structural failing: Evidence and arguments’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30 (4): 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder, C. and Yanenko, O. (2010) ‘Spatio-temporal proximity and social distance: A confirmation framework for social reporting’, in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks. San Jose, CA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, C. (2012) Making Sense of Public Opinion: American Discourses About Immigration and Social Problems ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitter Inc (2014) Prospectus. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312513390321/d5 64001 ds 1. htm#toc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna, M. (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media ( London: Bloomsbury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T. and Bichard, S. L. (2010) ‘The revolution will be networked’, Social Science Computer Review, 28 (1): 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Paul Baker and Tony McEnery

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, P., McEnery, T. (2015). Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate. In: Baker, P., McEnery, T. (eds) Corpora and Discourse Studies. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics