Abstract
In this chapter we examine discourses on the social media site Twitter around people who receive government support (commonly referred to as benefits), in the UK. Between 2008–2009 and 2011–2012, the UK experienced recession, and after coming to power in 2010 the Conservative-led coalition government embarked on a program of fiscal austerity that included cuts to some benefits. Baker (forthcoming) analysed the discourse around benefits in Britain’s most widely-read newspaper The Sun (a conservative tabloid), comparing the years 2002 and 2012. In 2012, the discourse around benefits was less sympathetic towards many types of benefit recipients, with the newspaper notably focusing on two constructions: benefits cheats and benefits culture, which respectively resulted in negative stories at the level of both the individual and the wider society. The newspaper painted a compelling picture of a benefits system created by the previous government that was both too soft and open to abuse and thus in need of reform.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism ( London: Verso).
Anthony, Laurence. (2011) AntConc (Version 3.2.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available at: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/.
Baker, P. (forthcoming) ‘Making the needy look greedy: Using corpus methods to examine The Sun’s discourse around benefits’, in J. Rahilly and V. Vander (eds.) Crossing Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in Language Studies (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Bossy, J. (2002) ‘Moral arithmetic: Seven sins into Ten Commandments’, in E. Leites (ed.) Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 214–23.
Burr, V. (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism ( London: Routledge).
Brezina, V., McEnery, T. and Wattam, S. (2015) ‘Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocational networks’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2).
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A. and Jacob, R. (2005) ‘The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (2): 145–66.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge ( London: Tavistock).
Jane, E. A. (2014) ‘Beyond antifandom: Cheerleading textual hate and new media ethics’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (2): 175–90.
Katz, M. B. (2013) The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. Second Edition ( New York: Oxford University Press).
Kendall, D. (2005) Framing Class: Media Representations of Wealth and Poverty in America ( Rowmand & Littlefield: Lanham MD).
Laboreiro, G., Sarmento, L., Teixeira, J. and Oliveira, E. (2010) ‘Tokenizing microblogging messages using a text classification approach’, in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. Toronto: ACM.
Le Bon, G. (1896) The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind ( New York: The Macmillan Co.).
McIntosh, M. K. (2005) ‘Poverty, charity, and coercion in Elizabethan England’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 35 (3): 457–79.
Merton, R. K. (1968) ‘The Matthew effect in science’, Science, 159 (3810): 56–63.
Nystrand, M. (1982) What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse ( New York: Academic).
OUP Dictionary Team (2009) RT This: OUP Dictionary Team Monitors Twitterer’s Tweets. Available at: http://blog.oup.com/2009/06/oxford-twitter/
Rank, M. R., Yoon, H.-S. and Hirschl, T. A. (2003) ‘American poverty as a structural failing: Evidence and arguments’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30 (4): 3–29.
Schlieder, C. and Yanenko, O. (2010) ‘Spatio-temporal proximity and social distance: A confirmation framework for social reporting’, in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks. San Jose, CA: ACM.
Strauss, C. (2012) Making Sense of Public Opinion: American Discourses About Immigration and Social Problems ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Twitter Inc (2014) Prospectus. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312513390321/d5 64001 ds 1. htm#toc.
Zappavigna, M. (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media ( London: Bloomsbury).
Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T. and Bichard, S. L. (2010) ‘The revolution will be networked’, Social Science Computer Review, 28 (1): 75–92.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Paul Baker and Tony McEnery
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, P., McEnery, T. (2015). Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate. In: Baker, P., McEnery, T. (eds) Corpora and Discourse Studies. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55729-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43173-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)