Abstract
Rafflesia is a genus of plants that is among the largest parasitic flowers in the world; the number of species of the plant is disputed but most likely is between fifteen and twenty. They are only found in Sumatra, Java, the Malay Peninsula and southern Philippines. The plant is not only unique due to its size, but also its parasitic nature and appearance. The only visible part of the plant is the flower; there are no stems, roots or leaves. The Rafflesia is connected to its host, the Tetrastigma (a genus of the grape family) vine, via fine microscopic threads. In addition, it is a slow growing plant. Tissue threads of the Rafflesia will spread in the vine for up to eighteen months before a bud appears. This bud then takes up to nine months to bloom.1 Since coming to the attention of European scholars/explorers in the late eighteenth century, the collection — or even sighting — of the flower has come to be the goal of a number of scientific expeditions, which is reflected in it depiction in local literature, botanical gardens, natural history museums and scientific classification pamphlets. The origin of much of this fascination contains many interconnecting threads, much like the microscopic ones that connect the Rafflesia to its host. It involves the network of ideas and understandings that the English East India Company (EIC) promoted throughout the world through it personnel, trade and related scientific societies that were related to the natural world and its classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
K. M. Salleh (1991), Raffl esia: Magnificent Flower of Sabah. Kota Kinabalu: Borneo Publishing Company, pp. 6–7, 22.
L. Y. Andaya (1993), The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
B. W. Andaya (2011), ‘Gathering “Knowledge” in the Bay of Bengal: The Letters of John Adolphus Pope, 1785–1788’, Paper presented at Penang and the Indian Ocean Conference, p. 7. The letter Pope wrote about betel can be found in
A. Bulley (1992), Free Mariner: John Adolphus Pope in the East Indies, 1786–1821. Putney: British Association of Cemeteries in South Asia, p. 105.
Isaac Henry Burkill — one of the most influential botanists of twentieth-century Southeast Asia — described the unique characteristics of the Rafflesia, and its ability to impress observers, as ‘an object so strange, fancy attributes strange virtues’. I. H. Burkill (1966), A Dictionary of Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula, Vol. II. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, p. 1894.
C. G. G. J. van Steenis et al. (1954), ‘Louise Auguste Deschamps: A Prominent but Ill-Fated Early Explorer of the Flora of Java, 1793–1798’, Bulletin of the British Museum (N. H.), Historical Series I: 51–68.
M. R. Dove and C. Carpenter (2005), ‘The “Poison Tree” and the Changing Vision of the Indo-Malay Realm: Seventeenth to Twentieth Centuries’, in R. Wadley (ed.), Histories of the Borneo Environment: Economic, Political and Social Dimensions of Change and Continuity. Leiden: KITLV, pp. 183–210.
E. M. Beekman (1993), The Poison Tree: Selected Writings of Rumphius on the Natural History of the Indies. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–40.
P. Findlen (2005), ‘Sites of Anatomy, Botany, and Natural History’, in K. Park and L. Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 280–2.
L. Koerner (1999), Linnaeus: Nature and Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 33–55;
A. B. Shteir (1996), Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora’s Daughters and Botany in England, 1760 to 1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 11–32.
J. Gascione (1998), Science in the Service of Empire: Joseph Banks, the British State and the Uses of Science in the Age of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–23.
J. Gascoigne (1995), Joseph Banks and the English Enlightenment: Useful Knowledge and Polite Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I would like to thank Robert Cribb for discussing these ideas with me.
D. McKay (1996), ‘Agents of Empire: The Banksian Collectors and Evaluation of New Lands’, in D. P. Miller and P. H. Reill (eds.), Visions of Empire: Voyages, Botany and Representations of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 39. These developments were mirrored in the Netherlands Indies with the founding of the Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten van Wetenschappen (Batavian Society of Arts and Sciences);
P. Boomgaard (2006), ‘The Making and Unmaking of Tropical Science: Dutch Research on Indonesia, 1600–2000’, Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 162(2–3): 195–6.
R. Drayton (2000), Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 126–7; Findlen, ‘Natural History’, pp. 444–6.
W. Marsden (1986), The History of Sumatra, with an Introduction by John Bastin. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1986; Marsden, A Brief Memoir, pp. 53–4, 139.
T. Horsfield (1990), The Natural History Researches of Dr Thomas Horsfield (1773–1859): First American Naturalist of Indonesia, with a Memoir by John Bastin. Singapore: Oxford University Press, p. 3.
J. Bastin (1973), ‘Dr Joseph Arnold and the Discovery of the Rafflesia Arnoldi in West Sumatra in 1818’, Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 6: 325.
D. J. Mabberley (1985), Jupiter Botanicus: Robert Brown of the British Museum. Braunschweig: J. Cramer, p. 219; Bastin, ‘Dr Joseph Arnold’, p. 310.
T. Hannigan (2012), Raffles and the British Invasion of Java. Singapore: Monsoon.
H. O. Forbes (1885), A Naturalist’s Wanderings in the Eastern Archipelago. A Narrative of Travel and Explorations from 1878 to 1883. New York: Harper and Brothers, p. 28.
S. H. Koorders (1918), Botanisch Overzicht der Rafflesiaceae van Nederlandsch-Indië. Batavia: G. Kolff.
Brown had originally placed it in the Aristolochiaceae family. The Rafflesia is so unique it is also the name of its own family, Rafflesiceae. T. J. Barkman, S. H. Lim, Kamarudin Mat Salleh and J. Nais (2004), ‘Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Reveal Photosynthetic Relatives of Rafflesia, the World’s Largest Flower’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(3): 787–92.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Timothy P. Barnard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnard, T.P. (2015). The Rafflesia in the Natural and Imperial Imagination of the East India Company in Southeast Asia. In: Damodaran, V., Winterbottom, A., Lester, A. (eds) The East India Company and the Natural World. Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49109-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42727-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)