Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engaging the Ethical Consumer and Investor

  • Chapter
Philanthropy in Transition

  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

The statistics laid out in chapter 2 illustrate the annual double-digit increases in dollars spent on ethical consumption and monies directed toward impact investing. Properly messaged and directed outreach will see these figures rise even higher. To date, social market enterprises and impact investing are understood by only a fraction of consumers. It is worth repeating that the issue here is not principled consumption (e.g., avoiding a certain food additive) or ethical investing (e.g., divestment from tobacco companies), but rather the proactive, forward-looking giving-through-buying and impact investing, both of which seek to shape the future through present actions. In both cases, the consumer willingly accepts a higher price (e.g., Fair Trades price premium) or a lower rate of return (e.g., an impact instrument with an environmental goal whose price history shows meager returns) in order to advance the social good. The distinction between avoidance of objectionable products and practices on one hand, and action embracing desired goods and services through outlays on the other is critical to appreciating the importance of each to a discussion of trends in philanthropy. Ethical consumption and ethical investing may be altruistic, but they are not philanthropic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W., and Cunningham, W. (1972). “The Socially Conscious Consumer.” Journal of Marketing 36, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, A., and Lyon, F. (2013). “Social Impact Measurement and Non-profit Organisations: Compliance, Resistance and Promotion.” Volunta: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations (April 30). DOI 10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C, Cloke, P., Clarke, N., and Malpass, A. (2005). “Consuming Ethics: Articulating the Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption.” Antipode 37, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackbaud Inc. (2012). The Blackbaud Index, Charleston, South Carolina: Blackbaud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, C. (1976). “The Self-Actualizing Socially Conscious Consumer.” Journal of Consumer Research 3, 107–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R., and Goodman, M. (2004). “Consuming Narratives: The Political Ecology of ‘Alternative’ Consumption.” Transactions 29, 344–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A. Hibbert, S., and Smith, A. (2007). “Why People Don’t Take Their Concerns About Fair Trade to the Supermarket: The Role of Neutralisation.” Journal of Business Ethics 74, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H., and Murray, J. (2002). “Drifting Away From Excessive Consumption: A New Social Movement Based on Identity Construction.” Advances in Consumer Research 29, 245–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2001). “Unpacking the Ethical Product.” Journal of Business Ethics 30, 361–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. (1999). “Playing by the Rules: Ethical Criteria at an Ethical Investment Fund.” Business Ethics: A European Review 8, 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ferran, F., and Grunert, K. (2007). “French Fair Trade Coffee Buyers’ Purchasing Motives: An Exploratory Study using Means-End Chain Analysis.” Food Quality and Preference 18, 218–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., and Rayp, G. (2005). “Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair Trade Coffee.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 363–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T., Auger, P., and Eckhardt, G. (2010), The Myth of the Ethical Consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, C. (2009). “The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption.” Journal of Business Ethics 84, 549–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.T. Jackson and Associates. (2012). Accelerating Impact: Achievements, Challenges and What’s Next in Building the Impact Investing Industry. Report prepared for the Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/images/fda23ba9-ab7e-4c83-9218-24fdd79289cc.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, B., Katsioloudes, M., and Weldon, R. (1998). “Nonprofit Organizations and the Internet.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S., and Rogers, G. (2007). “Understanding the LOHAS Consumer: The Rise of Ethical Consumerism.” LOHAS Online. Market Research update from The Natural Marketing Institute. Retrieved from http://www.lohas.com/Lohas-Consumer.

  • Gendron, C., Bisaillon, V., and Rance, A. (2008). “The Institutionalization of Fair Trade: More than Just a Degraded Form of Social Action.” Journal of Business Ethics 86, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goatman, A., and Lewis, B. (2007). “Charity E-volution? An Evaluation of the Attitudes of UK Charities Towards Website Adoption and Use.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Marketing 12, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, K., and Peattie, K. (2005). “In Search of the Golden Blend; Perspectives on the Marketing of Fair Trade Coffee.” Sustainable Development 13, 154–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grépin, K. (2012). “Efficiency Considerations of Donor Fatigue, Universal Access to ARTs and Health Systems.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 88, 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., and Van den Bergh, B. (2010). “Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackler, D., and Saxton, G. (2007). “The Strategic Use of Information Technology by Nonprofit Organizations: Increasing Capacity and Untapped Potential.” Public Administration Review 67, 474–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. (2002). “ePhilanthropy: Using the Internet to Build Support.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7, 353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. (2011). “Substitutes or Symbiosis? Assessingthe Relationship Between Religious and Secular Giving.” Social Forces 90, 157–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hira, A., and Ferrie, J. (2006). “Fair Trade: Three Key Challenges for Reaching the Mainstream.” Journal of Business Ethics 63, 107–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, R. (2012). “From Web Site Visitor to Online Contributor: Three Internet Fundraising Techniques for Nonprofits.” Social Work 57, 361–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoff, D., and Keolling, A. (2009). “The Potential of Web Sites as a Relationship Building Tool for Charitable Fundraising NPOs.” Public Relations Review 35, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). (2009). What Is Impact Assessment? Fargo, ND: IAIA. Available at https://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/What%20is%20IA_web.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T., Taylor, T., and Sadrudin, A. (1974). “Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?” Journal of Marketing 38, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnick, K, Krugman, D., and Cameron, G. (1996). “Compassion Fatigue: Communication and Burnout Toward Social Problems.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73, 687–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Berniker, E., Wyhe, G., and Johnston, K. (2005). “E-commerce Disruptive Innovations in Charity and Non-Profit Fund Raising.” Journal of Strategic E-Commerce 5, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekakis, E. (2013). Coffee Activism and the Politics of Fair Trade and Ethical Consumption in the Global North: Political Consumerism and Cultural Citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, A., Liou, C., and Shaw, K. (2004). “A Taste of Trade Justice: Marketing Global Responsibility via Fair Trade Coffee.” Globalizations 1, 223–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J., Barnett, C, and Soper, K. (2005). “Consumers: Agents of Change?” Soundings 31, 147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2009). Radical Consumption: Shopping For Change in Contemporary Culture. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Bober, M., and Helsper, E. (2005). “Active Participation or Just More Information? Young People’s Take-up of Opportunities to Act and Interact on the Internet.” Information, Commerce & Society 8, 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (2010). An Analysis of Ethical Consumption Participation and Motivation. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins. http://digitool.library.colostate.edu///exlibris/dtl/d3_l/apache_media/L2V4bGlicml-zL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS85NTk3Mg==.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, M., and Lotade, J. (2005). “Do Fair Trade and Eco-Labels in Coffee Wake up the Consumer Conscience?” Ecological Economics 53, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, W., and Davenport, E. (2005). “Has the Medium (Roast) Become the Message? The Ethics of Marketing Fair Trade in the Mainstream.” International Marketing Review 22, 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, A., Barnett, C., Clarke, N., and Cloke, P. (2007). “Problematizing Choice: Responsible Consumers, Skeptical Citizens.” In M. Bevir and F. Trentmann, eds., Governance, Consumers and Citizens, pp. 231–56. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachian, J., and Gardner, J. (2004). “A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investors.” Journal of Business Ethics 52, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism and Collective Action. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2001). “The Poverty of Morality.” Journal of Consumer Culture 1, 225–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, L., Keating, S., Bruwer, L, Murgolo-Poore, M., and de Bussy, N. (2001). “Charitable Contributions as Social Exchange or Agapic Action on the Internet: The Case of Hungersite.com.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 9, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puttick, R., and Ludlow, J. (2012). “Standards of Evidence for Impact Investing.” London: NESTA. Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/standards_of_evidence_for_impact_investing.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. (2007). “Fair Trade Bananas: Broadening the Movement and Market in the United States.” In D. Raynolds, L. Murray, and J. Wilkinson, eds., Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization. London and New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. (2009). “Mainstreaming Fair Trade Coffee: From Partnerships to Traceability” World Development 37, 1083–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C, and Ponomariov B. (2013). “The Effects of Associational Participation on Internet Charitable Donations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, N., and Colantonio, A. (2013). “Measuring Impact and Non-financial Returns in Impact Investing: A Critical Overview of Concepts and Practice.” Working Paper. London: School of Economics and Political Science. http://files.lsecities.net/files/2013/10/Measuring_Impact-full-length-Oct-20131.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (1996). “Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?” Business Horizons 39, 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., Sandler, D., and Shani, D. (1991). “Social Issues and Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 25, 221–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., West, D., and Jay, E. (2007). “The Relational Determinants of Nonprofit Web Sites Fundraising Effectiveness: An Exploratory Study.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 18, 141–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G., Neely, D., and Guo, C. (2011). “Web Disclosure and the Market for Charitable Contributions.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33, 127–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G.D., and Wang, L. (forthcoming).“The Social Network Effect: The Determinants of Giving Through Social Media.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitz, C. (2008). Demographic Characteristics of Ethical Consumers. Unpublished Masters thesis. Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/811/CaseySchnitz2008.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., and Clarke, I. (1999). “Belief Formation in Ethical Consumer Groups: An Exploratory Study.” Marketing Intelligence and Planning 17, 109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., and Newholm, T. (2002). “Voluntary Simplicity and the Ethics of Consumption.” Psychology and Marketing 19, 167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., and Thomson, J. (2005). “An Exploration of Values in Ethical Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Behavior 4, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag-Padilla, L., Staplefoote, L., and Morganti, K. (2012). “Financial Stability for Nonprofit Organizations—Review of the Literature.” Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR100/RR121/RAND_RR121.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (2004). “Rethinking the “Good Life”: The Consumer as Citizen.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 15, 111–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, K. (2012). “The Trouble with Impact Investing.” Stanford Social Innovation Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., and Micheletti, M. (2005). “Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a form of Political Participation.” International Political Science Review 26, 245–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, C. (1997). “The Problems of Translating Fair Trade Principles into Consumer Purchase Behaviour.” Marketing Intelligence and Planning 15, 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, J., and Leung, P. (2001). “Defining Ethical Investment and its Demography in Australia.” Australian Accounting Review 11, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H., Chatterjee, P., and Muha, D. (2004). “Nonprofit Websites: Prevalence, Usage and Commercial Activity.” Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 12, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, M., and Wiepking, P. (2012). “National Campaigns for Charitable Causes: A Literature Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42, 219–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. (2003). “International Principles for Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, N. (2010). “Online Fund Raising is Becoming an Important Source of Small Gifts for Nonprofit Managers.” Chronicle of Philanthropy 22, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, M. (2009). Fundraising When Money Is Tight: A Strategic and Practical Guide to Surviving Tough Times and Thriving in the Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. (2007). “Nonprofit Organizations’ Use of the Internet: A Content Analysis of Communication Trends on the Internet Sites of the Philanthropy 400.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 18, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (1975). “Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer.” The Journal of Consumer Research 2, 188–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., and Welford, R. (2002). Ethical Shopping: Where to Shop, What to Buy and What to Do to Make a Difference. London: Fusion Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark S. LeClair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2014 Mark S. LeClair

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeClair, M.S. (2014). Engaging the Ethical Consumer and Investor. In: Philanthropy in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394484_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation