Skip to main content

A History of Philanthropy in the United States

  • Chapter
Philanthropy in Transition
  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

The United States remains the most philanthropic nation in the world, even with the expansion of its domestic welfare state in the past half-century. In the postwar period, Europe, in particular, has pursued an assertive role for the state in its social policies, and the continents charitable giving has been diminished. All available statistics show that, compared with the citizens of other industrialized countries, Americans are more generous, both in terms of money donated and volunteer hours worked. Indeed, one could say that the conception of charity in the United States is unique, derived as it is from singular historical and religious events and expressed in an insistence that government largesse and giving by individuals remain two prongs of social policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, M. (2002). “Socially Responsible Fund Boom: Maybe.” American 167, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albinger, H., and Freeman, S. (2000). “Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations.” Journal of Business Ethics 28, 243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., and Hatfield, J. (1985). “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability.” The Academy of Management Journal 28, 446–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., and Salomon, R. (2006). “Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 27, 1101–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E., and Haire, M. (1975). “A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility.” California Management Review 18, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., and Millington, A. (2005). “Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Business Ethics 61, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., and Pavelin, S. (2006). “Is Philanthropy Strategic? An Analysis of the Management of Charitable Giving in Large UK Companies.” Business Ethics 15, 234–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., and Logsdon, J. (1996). “How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off.” Long Range Planning 29, 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Patten, D., and Roberts, R. (2008). “Corporate Charitable Contributions: A Corporate Social Performance or Legitimacy Strategy?” Journal of Business Ethics 82, 131–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P., and Wood, R. (1984). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 27, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, C. P. (1987). Corporate Philanthropy: Attitudes of Institutional Shareholders, Individual Shareholders, and Corporate Philanthropy Executives. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. (2003). “Social Investing: Mainstream or Backwater.” Journal of Business Ethics 43, 247–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P., Mohr, L., and Webb, D. (2000). “Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do They Mix?” Journal of Retailing 76, 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entine, J. (2003). “The Myth of Social Investing.” Organization and Environment 20, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profits.” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 32–33, 122, 124, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1989). “Corporate Contributions to Charity: Nothing More than a Marketing Strategy.” In E. Magat, ed., Philanthropic Giving: Studies in Varieties and Goalsl, pp. 246–60. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., and Mahon, J. (1997). “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research.” Business and Society 36, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerard, J., and Stone, B. (2002). “Social Screening Does not Harm Performance.” Pensions and Investments 30, 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1989). “Business Giving and Social Investment in the United States.” In R. Magat, ed., Philanthropic Giving: Studies in Varieties and Goals, pp. 221–45. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClair, M., and Gordon, K. (2000). “Corporate Support for Artistic and Cultural Activities: What Determines the Distribution of Corporate Giving.” Journal of Cultural Economics 24, 225–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2000). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification.” Strategic Management Journal 21, 603–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. (2008). “Does the Market Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from the Response to the 2004 Tsunami Relief Effort.” Journal of Business Ethics 81, 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and Kramer, M. (2002). “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy.” Harvard Business Review 80, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1950). “The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems.” UN document no. E/CN.12/89/Rev.1. Reprinted 1962 in Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., Stutts, M., and Patterson, L. (1991). “Tactical Considerations for the Effective Use of Cause Related Marketing,” Journal of Applied Business Research, 7, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., Patterson, L., and Stutts, M. (1992). “Consumer Perceptions of Organizations that Use Cause-Related Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20, 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiia, D., Carroll, A., and Buchholtz, A. (2003). “Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity Begins at Home.” Business and Society 42, 169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, G, and Trahan, R. (2007). “Rethinking the New Corporate Philanthropy.” Business Horizons 50, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D. (1997). “The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund.” Review of Financial Economics 6, 137–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B., Morris, S., and Bartkus, B. (2004). “Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance.” Business and Society 43, 135–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soskis, B. (2010). “The Pre- and Early History of American Corporate Philanthropy.” Working paper no. 3. Minneapolis: Center for Ethical Business Cultures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B., and Taylor, G. (1987). “A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.” Akron Business and Economic Review 18, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D., and Greening, D. (1997). “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees,” Academy of Management Journal 40, 658–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Choi, J., and Li, J. (2008). “Too Little or Too Much? Untangling the Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance,” Organizational Science 19, 143–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. (1992). “Tax and Government Policy Implications for Corporate Foundation Giving.” Working paper no. 37. Duke University: Center for the Study of Philanthropy and Voluntarism, Institute of Policy Science and Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D., and Mohr, L. (1998). “A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 17, 226–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, T. (2005). “Fair Trade Marketing: An Alternative System for Globalization and Development.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Mark S. LeClair

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeClair, M.S. (2014). A History of Philanthropy in the United States. In: Philanthropy in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394484_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics