Skip to main content

Making Critical Thinking Visible in Undergraduates’ Experiences of Scientific Research

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

Abstract

What does it look like when undergraduate students practice critical thinking in an authentic scientific research context? Do we provide such students with opportunities to show their critical thinking in action—or do we, for the most part, leave it hidden? And, if critical thinking can be made visible, how can we recognize and hence develop and assess it?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. 2005. “Academic Growth and Development—How Do University Academics Experience It?” Higher Education 50 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., and Hounsell, D. 2007. “Knowledge Practices: ‘Doing the Subject’ in Undergraduate Courses.” Curriculum Journal 18 (4): 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. 1997. “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C., and Prosser, M. 2004. “Generic Graduate Attributes: Citizens for an Uncertain Future.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. 1987. Developing Critical Thinkers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. S., Buckingham, L. I., Hynd, J. R., McMahon, C. A., Roggenkamp, M. G., and Stoodley, I. D. 2006. “Ways of Experiencing the Act of Learning to Program: A Phenomenographic Study of Introductory Programming Students at University.” Transforming IT Education: Promoting a Culture of Excellence, edited by Christine Bruce, George Mohay, Glenn Smith, Ian Stoodley, and Robyn Tweedale. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science. 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. 2006. “An ‘Infusion’ Approach to Critical Thinking: Moore on the Critical Thinking Debate.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (2): 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. 1992. “The Degree to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject Specific: Clarification and Needed Research.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal, edited by S. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press. 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. 2009. “Teaching for Understanding at University. Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking.” Imprint 11: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Concensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, E. S. 2010. A Critical Analysis of Richard Paul’s Substantive Trans-Disciplinary Conception of Critical Thinking, Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. 2007. “Multiplicities or Manna from Heaven? Critical Thinking and the Disciplinary Context.” Australian Journal of Education 5 (1): 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography—Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional science 10 (2): 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, V., and Hounsell, D. 2005. “The Development of Students’ Ways of Thinking and Practising in Three Final-Year Biology Courses.” Higher Education 49 (3): 255–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J. 1992. “Thoughts on Subject Specificity.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal, edited by S. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P. B. 1963. “Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud.” The Listener 70 (1798): 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. 2011. “Critical Thinking and Disciplinary Thinking: A Continuing Debate.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. 2005. “The State of Critical Thinking Today.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2005 (130): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithers, R. T., and Soden, R. 2000. “Critical Thinking in Education: A Review.” Educational Research 42 (3): 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, A.N., Howitt, S.M., Higgins, D.M., Roberts, P.J. (2015). Making Critical Thinking Visible in Undergraduates’ Experiences of Scientific Research. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics