Skip to main content

Abstract

Critical thinking is one of the central aims of education, and many schools and universities have courses specifically devoted to critical thinking. Ennis (1989) defines critical thinking as “reasonable reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do.” There are of course many other definitions of critical thinking, but most of them emphasize the importance of rationality, clarity, analysis, and independence of thought. In a typical university course on critical thinking, students might study logic, argument analysis, basic scientific methodology, fallacies, and other related topics. They learn how to distinguish between good and bad reasoning, and use this knowledge to improve their own thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arum, R., and Roksa, J. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G., Kim K.A., Nofsinger J. R., and Rui, O. M. 2007. “Trading Performance, Disposition Effect, Overconfidence, Representativeness Bias, and Experience of Emerging Market Investors.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (4): 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L. 1991. The School as a Home for the Mind. Palatine, IL: Skylight Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., and McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised Neo Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory NEO-FFI) Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. (revised edition). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A. P., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., and van Baaren, R. B. 2006. “On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-without-Attention Effect.” Science 311: 1005–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, S. J., Matyja, A. M., and Huber, J. L. 2007. “Which Factors Best Account for Academic Success: Those Which College Students Can Control or Those They Cannot?” Journal of Research in Personality 42 (4): 872–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., and Kelly, D. R. 2007. “Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (6): 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. 1986. “Motivational Processes Affecting Learning.” American Psychologist 41 (10): 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., and Elliott, E. S. 1983. “Achievement Motivation.” In Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 14, Socialization, Personality, and Social Development, edited by E. M. Hetherington, (fourth edition). New York: Wiley. 643–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. 1989. “Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research.” Educational Researcher 18 (3): 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., and Lehmann, A. C. 1996. “Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints.” Annual Review of Psychology 47: 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. 2003. “In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10): 454–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, E. C., and Klein, H. J. 2011. “Personality Predictors of Behavioral Self-Regulation: Linking Behavioral Self-Regulation to Five-Factor Model Factors, Facets, and a Compound Trait.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 19 (2): 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. 1981. “Ambiguity and Bias in the Self-Concept.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. 1976. “Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving.” In The Nature of Intelligence, edited by L. B. Resnick. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., and Gross, J. J. 2008. “The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation: Reappraisal and Suppression of Negative Emotion.” Biological Psychiatry 63 (6): 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. 1998. “Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.” American Psychologist 53 (4): 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, R. A. 2012. “Assessing the Long-Term Impact of a Metacognitive Approach to Creative Skill Development.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 (3): 489–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., and Lepper, M. 2000. “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. P., and Harkins, S. G. 2010. “Evaluation Is Necessary to Produce Stereotype Threat Performance Effects.” Social Influence 5 (2): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., and Huie, F. 2008. “Self-Regulation and Ability Predictors of Academic Success during College: A Predictive Validity Study.” Journal of Advanced Academics 20 (1): 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., and Dunning, D. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. 1989. Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., and Whittaker, W. 1977. “Managerial Myopia: Self-Serving Biases in Organizational Planning.” Journal of Applied Psychology 62: 194–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., and Ross, L. 2004. “The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (9): 1175–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochhead, J., and Whimbey, A. 1980. Problem Solving and Comprehension. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magno, C. 2010. “The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Developing Critical Thinking.” Metacognition Learning 5 (2): 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, K. 2011. The Willpower Instinct: How Self-Control Works, Why It Matters, and What You Can Do to Get More of It. New York: Avery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, C. C. 1926. The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses, Genetic Studies of Genius. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., and Caspi, A. 2011. “A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 108 (7): 2693–2698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R., Willsen, J., and Binker, A. J. A. 1993. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. (revised third edition). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. 1993. “Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 39 (1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., Shiv, B., and Rangel, A. 2008. “Marketing Actions Can Modulate Neural Representations of Experienced Pleasantness.” Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America 105 (3): 1050–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. 1945. How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E. 2008. “How We See Ourselves and How We See Others.” Science 320: 1177–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., and Hill, P. L. 2012. “What Is Conscientiousness and How Can It Be Assessed?” Developmental Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1990. Decision Traps: The Ten Barriers to Decision-Making and How to Overcome Them. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F. 2008. “On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability.” Journal of Persoanlity and Social Psychology 94 (4): 672–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. 1981. “Are We Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers?” Acta Psychologica 43: 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., and Stanovich, K. E. 2011. “The Cognitive Reflection Test as a Predictor of Performance on Heuristics-and-Biases Tasks.” Memory and Cognition 39: 1275–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. 2002. The Manifesto: A Guide to Developing a Creative Career. Westport, CT: Ablex Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., and Kennedy, G., J. 2011. “Teaching Learning Strategies to Increase Success of First-Term College Students.” Journal of Experimental Education 79: 478–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, E. L., and Cohen, G. L. 2007. ““I Think It, Therefore It’s True”: Effects of Self Perceived Objectivity on Hiring Discrimination.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (2): 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor. 2012. “Number of Jobs, Labor Market Experience, and Earnings Growth: Results from a Longitudinal Survey” [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/nlsoy.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. D. 1980. “Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., and Uzzi, B. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates J. F., Lee J. W., Shinotsuka H., Patalano A. L., and Sieck, W. R. 1998. “Cross-Cultural Variations in Probability Judgment Accuracy: Beyond General Knowledge Overconfidence?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74 (2): 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. W. 1975. A Technique for Producing Ideas. Chicago, IL: Crain Commmunication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., and Schunk, D. H. 2008. “Motivation: An Essential Dimension of Self-Regulated Learning.” In Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmermaned. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lau, J.Y.F. (2015). Metacognitive Education: Going beyond Critical Thinking. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics